seoblog-humanize
Skill0 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Rewrite an existing SEO Blog draft by id or slug to remove AI writing tells without changing its facts, links or images, or list drafts when no target is supplied.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- blog-imagesSkill
- blog-publishSkill
- humanizeSkill
- seoblog-publishSkill
- seoblog-setupSkill
- seo-blogSkill
- seoblog-statusSkill
- seo-researchSkill
- seo-writingSkill
- social-articleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read runtime instructions before running scripts.
- Very specific: line 10
Use the humanize skill to do the rewrite and the blog-publish skill for the cms.mjs mechanics.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use the user's request as the arguments.
- Very specific: line 26
Run the blog preflight (doctor.mjs --workflow blog --site <id> --text-only).
- Very specific: line 33
Read the site's voiceSamples, directions and toneGuide from config.json, then run the humanize skill's full process (mark, draft, check, …
- Very specific: line 38
Write the patch to the session scratch directory as JSON holding only the fields that changed (body, title, metaDescription, excerpt), …
- Distinctive: line 41
If nothing needed changing, say so and skip the update.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Humanize an existing blog draft
Read runtime instructions before running scripts.
Use the humanize skill to do the rewrite and the
blog-publish skill for the cms.mjs mechanics.
Use the user's request as the arguments.
Arguments may name a draft by slug or id, optionally with a site
(--site <id>); otherwise use defaultSite. Running this command with a target
IS the rewrite instruction: do it immediately, without asking for
confirmation. If arguments are empty, list current drafts
(cms.mjs list --status draft --exclude-assets) with their titles and
live-URLs-to-be, then stop; the user re-runs with a slug or id. Drafts with
slug sc-assets-* are SocialCue image holders: never list or rewrite them;
if one is named as the target, refuse and say why.
Steps:
- Run the blog preflight (
doctor.mjs --workflow blog --site <id> --text-only). - Resolve the target. An id is used as is. A slug is matched against
cms.mjs list --site <id> --exclude-assets(any status; a published article may be humanized too, and it stays published). - Fetch the full article with
cms.mjs get --site <id> --id N.getexists for the articles-api adapter only; for wordpress or shopify, say that the adapter has no single-article read yet and stop. - Read the site's
voiceSamples,directionsandtoneGuidefrom config.json, then run the humanize skill's full process (mark, draft, check, final) onbody,title,metaDescriptionandexcerpt. Leave<img>tags, links, code and the tag list untouched. Never ask the user anything; if a sentence needs a detail you do not have, simplify it. - Write the patch to the session scratch directory as JSON holding only the
fields that changed (
body,title,metaDescription,excerpt), neverstatus, and apply it withcms.mjs update --site <id> --id N --file patch.json. If nothing needed changing, say so and skip the update. - Report: the article's title and live URL, the humanize report line
(
humanize: N tells fixed (strongest: …)), and the single strongest before/after pair in 3 to 5 lines. Do not update the state file; the article record already exists and its status has not changed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

