agent-system-partners / global
CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Applies to every development request (platforms, systems, integrations, sites, scripts) that is more than a trivial single-file edit. Copy work and pure research follow their own pipelines but inherit the "no calendar" rule. Routing defaults for the estimate table: Fable for architecture, hard bugs, final review; Opus for implementation volume; Sonnet for subagents and mechanical work. Always offer at least two rows (all-Fable vs. split routing) and mark the recommended one. The user decides the routing at GO. Note: these…
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- copywriting-frameworksSkill
- design-mdSkill
- format-carouselSkill
- format-hooksSkill
- format-linkedinSkill
- format-reelsSkill
- funnel-designSkill
- humanizationSkill
- launch-playbooksSkill
- offer-designSkill
- pipeline-brandSkill
- pipeline-campaignSkill
- pipeline-contentSkill
- pipeline-copySkill
- pipeline-landing-pageSkill
- pipeline-luxoSkill
- pipeline-refino-uiSkill
- pipeline-sistemaSkill
- scroll-worldSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Before writing code, produce a plan and stop for the user's GO.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- agent-system:planning-doctrine:start -->Global operating rules (all folders, all sessions)
Planning Doctrine — Single Round (2026-09-08)
Applies to every development request (platforms, systems, integrations, sites, scripts) that is more than a trivial single-file edit. Copy work and pure research follow their own pipelines but inherit the "no calendar" rule.
1. Plan first, wait for GO
Before writing code, produce a plan and stop for the user's GO. Trivial edits (one file, unambiguous, reversible) skip the plan.
2. Never plan in time
A plan NEVER contains days, weeks, hours, sprints, "round 1/2/3" as time, or phase durations. Work that takes minutes must not be dressed as a calendar. An external client deadline may appear once, as a constraint (a fact), never as a schedule for the work. Phases (A, B, C…) express dependency order only.
3. Plan structure (mandatory, 5 blocks) — template: ~/.claude/templates/plano-rodada.md
- Objective + what already exists — one sentence, then a reuse table (what exists / what is missing).
- Executable scope now — EVERYTHING that can be built with the information and access available, ordered by dependency. If the whole request is executable, the plan says "GO total". Nothing is deferred for lack of time, only for a real barrier.
- Barrier — split in two: what blocks testing (what the human/client must do to validate) and what blocks continuing (missing information, access, decision). Every item becomes an explicit request. Decisions that are the user's to make are listed with a recommendation.
- Done criteria + self-tests — what the agent verifies alone before reporting (build, unit/E2E tests, diff read-through, screenshot).
- Usage estimate — table "How to execute" (rows = model routing options, columns = API-equiv cost, % Fable weekly, % general weekly), the recommended row marked, then one line of optimizations (which model at which step, subagents or not, minimal scope, reuse). Run
claude-usage --estimate <usd>to convert cost into % and to print the current window state ("costs ~X% Fable · today at Y%, pace Z%").
4. Build to the barrier
After GO, execute the entire executable scope without stopping to ask, except for destructive or irreversible actions (production deploy, bulk sends, data deletion, campaign activation). Then run a review pass: check every plan item against what was built (tests, build, E2E, reading the diff). Any divergence becomes a report item, never silence.
5. Report structure (mandatory, 5 blocks) — template: ~/.claude/templates/report-rodada.md
- Done vs planned — table: item → state → evidence.
- Test script for the human/client — step by step, with expected results.
- Requests for the next planning round — information, access, decisions.
- Actual vs estimated usage — for calibration; note the model routing that was used.
- Next barrier — what the next round will need.
6. Usage reference (calibrated 2026-09-02, Claude Max 20x)
Weekly caps ≈ $3,300 general / $1,770 Fable (API-equiv). Fable runs ≈ $65–110/h. Reference classes:
| Class | API-equiv | % Fable weekly | % general weekly |
| Small edit (1–2 files) | $5–15 | <1% | <0.5% |
| Feature in one project (UI + API + test) | $40–70 | 2–4% | 1–2% |
| Multi-phase round (migration + UI + integration + tests) | $120–250 | 7–14% | 4–8% |
| New system from zero | >$300 | >17% | >9% |
Routing defaults for the estimate table: Fable for architecture, hard bugs, final review; Opus for implementation volume; Sonnet for subagents and mechanical work. Always offer at least two rows (all-Fable vs. split routing) and mark the recommended one. The user decides the routing at GO.
Note: these weekly caps are calibrated for a Claude Max 20x plan. Each partner must recalibrate the
CAP_ALL,CAP_FABLEandCAP_5Hconstants inclaude-usagefor their own plan before trusting the percentages.
7. Enforcement
A global PostToolUse hook (~/.claude/hooks/plan-no-time-lint.cjs) warns when a plan file (PLANO-*.md, *-plano*.md, brain/ops/plans/*.md) contains calendar patterns. Warning only — fix the plan when it fires.
Related: Agent System director doctrine at <repo>/.claude/agents/director.md.
<!-- agent-system:planning-doctrine:end -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

