agentleFS
moogahmoogah/claude_skills/process-improvement/SKILL.md

process-improvement

Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Identify and propose improvements to the research and orchestrate skills and their roles, along quality, speed and cost, at the scope each is true for (a cycle, a change, a repository, a workspace, the whole process); run the open after-measures first; write a proposals file of a few rows the user decides on; apply the accepted rows where their scope lives, never installing or pushing. Use when the user invokes `/process-improvement`, asks to review or improve the process, to read the cycles a home has run, to run the after-measures, or to triage process notes; in an orchestrator home (`.claude/orchestrator/config.yaml`) or in the skills workspace (`home.org` with its homes table and `refinements.org`). Skip during a running cycle (the PM digest carries a cycle's signals), for a defect in the product's code (the change's record takes it), and for designing a new role or step (a research effort or a refinement session does that).

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.