verification-before-completion
Skill8 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive five-level validation checklist that every agent must pass before declaring any task or work package complete.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DJtx001/ai-coding-playbooktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ai-assistant-KIRA/antigravity-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-ci
문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-interfaces
API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +4 more from jh941213
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- pedronauck/skills★ 649same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- context/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-designSkill
- backendSkill
- cavemanSkill
- commitSkill
- evaluator-optimizerSkill
- frontend-design-systemSkill
- interactive-live-testingSkill
- module-planningSkill
- multi-agent-orchestrationSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- prSkill
- ralph-loopSkill
- review-boardSkill
- reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- verificationSkill
- work-recordingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Before marking any work package as COMPLETE
- Distinctive: line 14
Before committing code changes
- Distinctive: line 15
Before reporting success to a supervisor or orchestrator agent
- Distinctive: line 16
Before moving to the next task
- Distinctive: line 139
When reporting to a supervisor agent:
- Distinctive: line 162
If any verification level fails:
- Distinctive: line 227
Run full verification for every change
- Distinctive: line 230
Update tests when behavior changes
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verification Before Completion Skill
Never mark a task as complete without thorough verification. This skill ensures quality gates are passed before any agent reports success upward. The commands below assume a TypeScript/Node monorepo with Vitest or Jest; the discipline is stack-agnostic and every level maps cleanly onto any compiled language or test runner.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill:
- Before marking any work package as COMPLETE
- Before committing code changes
- Before reporting success to a supervisor or orchestrator agent
- Before moving to the next task
The Verification Protocol
Level 1: Compilation Verification
# TypeScript compilation
npx tsc --noEmit
# Schema tool generation (if the data model changed)
# [CUSTOMIZE: replace with your ORM or codegen command, e.g. prisma generate, drizzle-kit generate, graphql-codegen]
<your-schema-tool> generate
# Service-specific build
npm run build --workspace=apps/<service-name>Pass Criteria:
- Zero TypeScript errors (or zero compiler errors in your language)
- Zero schema-generation errors
- Build completes successfully
Level 2: Static Analysis
# Linting
npm run lint
# Type coverage (if configured)
npm run type-coveragePass Criteria:
- No new linting errors introduced
- Type coverage maintained or improved
Level 3: Unit Tests
# Run unit tests for affected files
npm test -- --testPathPattern="<affected_file>"
# Run full service tests
npm test -- --projects=<service-name>Pass Criteria:
- All existing tests pass
- New tests added for new functionality
- No test regressions
Level 4: Integration Verification
# Start service locally
npm run start:dev --workspace=apps/<service-name>
# Health check
curl http://localhost:<PORT>/healthPass Criteria:
- Service starts without errors
- Health check returns 200 OK
- No runtime errors in logs
Level 5: Functional Verification
For specific changes, verify the actual functionality:
## Functional Test Checklist
### Change: [description of change]
- [ ] Primary functionality works
- [ ] Edge cases handled
- [ ] Error scenarios handled
- [ ] Related functionality not brokenVerification Matrix
| Change Type | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 |
| Schema change | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Service code | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Utility function | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - | - |
| Type definition | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | - |
| Comment/docs | ✓ | - | - | - | - |
Pre-Commit Checklist
Before running /commit:
## Pre-Commit Verification
### Code Quality
- [ ] No TODO/FIXME added without a tracked ticket
- [ ] No console.log in production code
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] No commented-out code blocks
### TypeScript
- [ ] `npx tsc --noEmit` passes
- [ ] No `any` types introduced
- [ ] All new functions have return types
### Tests
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] New tests for new code
- [ ] No test files skipped
### Documentation
- [ ] Work record updated
- [ ] API changes documented
- [ ] Breaking changes notedVerification Report Format
When reporting to a supervisor agent:
{
"workPackage": "WP-XX",
"status": "VERIFIED | FAILED",
"levels": {
"L1_compilation": "PASS",
"L2_static": "PASS",
"L3_unit": "PASS",
"L4_integration": "PASS",
"L5_functional": "PASS"
},
"issues": [],
"filesModified": ["path/to/file.ts"],
"testsRun": 15,
"testsPassed": 15,
"coverageChange": "+2%"
}Failure Handling
If any verification level fails:
## Verification Failure Report
### Level Failed: L3 - Unit Tests
### Error Details
[test output]
### Analysis
[What caused the failure]
### Next Steps
- [ ] Fix the issue
- [ ] Re-run verification from L1
- [ ] Do not proceed until all levels passIntegration with Multi-Agent System
The tester agent uses this skill for every work package:
supervisor -> tester: "Verify WP-03 completion"
tester -> [runs all verification levels]
tester -> supervisor: {
"workPackage": "WP-03",
"status": "VERIFIED",
"levels": { ... },
"recommendation": "PROCEED | FIX_REQUIRED"
}Quick Verification Commands
# Full verification suite (if a verify script is configured)
npm run verify
# Or manually:
# [CUSTOMIZE: replace the schema-tool line with your own codegen command]
<your-schema-tool> generate && \
npx tsc --noEmit && \
npm run lint && \
npm test
# For a specific service:
cd apps/<service-name> && \
npx tsc --noEmit && \
npm testAnti-Patterns
DON'T:
- Skip verification "because the change is small"
- Ignore failing tests
- Suppress linting errors
- Mark as complete before verification
- Assume it works without testing
DO:
- Run full verification for every change
- Fix failures before proceeding
- Document verification results
- Update tests when behavior changes
- Report honest status
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

