agentleFS
mm-webermm-weber/loremaester/skills/chronik/SKILL.md

chronik

Skill20 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the GM asks to update, extend, or fix the Campaign Chronicle (Campaign_Chronicle.md) from PlayerNotes. Triggers on requests to add a session to the chronicle, summarize player notes into the campaign record, or fix missing details in existing chronicle entries. The core discipline is preserving precise information exchange details — who told whom what, what was withheld, what intelligence each party gained.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Update the Campaign Chronicle from PlayerNotes with strict information-exchange precision.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    If the Chronicle entry doesn't answer that question, it's incomplete.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Write the entry following the established Chronicle format:

    line 56
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep entries factual and precise — the Chronicle is not prose, it's a record

    line 60
  5. Distinctive:

    Before presenting the draft, verify against the PlayerNotes:

    line 64
  6. Distinctive:

    Commit with a descriptive message: if the vault is git-tracked

    line 79
  7. Distinctive:

    When fixing an existing Chronicle entry (not writing a new one):

    line 91
  8. Very specific:

    Read the current entry with vault_read_section on the Chronicle (or a Read of only its lines), not the whole Chronicle

    line 92
  9. Distinctive:

    Read the corresponding PlayerNotes

    line 93

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Campaign Chronicle Update Assistant

Update the Campaign Chronicle from PlayerNotes with strict information-exchange precision. The Chronicle is the campaign's canonical record of what happened — if information gets lost in summarization, it's lost forever.

The Cardinal Rule

For every NPC interaction in the Chronicle, a reader must be able to answer: "What exactly does each party know after this conversation that they didn't know before?"

If the Chronicle entry doesn't answer that question, it's incomplete.

Source of Truth Hierarchy

Per the vault's CLAUDE.md:

  1. PlayerNotes = what HAPPENED (player actions, canon)
  2. In-game calendar / dates = when events occurred (canon)
  3. Session prep files = what was PLANNED (context, may or may not be canon depending on player actions)

The Chronicle synthesizes all three, but PlayerNotes always win on what occurred.

Workflow

Phase 1: Read and Identify

  1. Read the PlayerNotes for the target session(s) whole. They are the source of truth and rarely have sections to pick from, so they are the read ladder's exception.
  2. Read the session prep through the read ladder: list the files in Sessions/Session N/, call vault_read_note on each (a small file comes back whole, a large one as an outline), then vault_read_section for the parts the player notes touch. The prep holds GM context about NPC motivations, hidden agendas, and what information NPCs were trying to extract.
  3. Check every NPC the player notes mention: vault_mentions(note="NPC Name", paths=["Sessions/Session N"]) for what that session's prep says about them, and vault_read_note(note="NPC Name") for who they are. Pay attention to faction, relationships, and any campaign-connection sections; read those with vault_read_section when the note is large.
  4. Check in-game dates — if the vault tracks dates (e.g. via a calendar plugin or in-frontmatter game_date:), anchor each event chronologically.

Phase 2: Extract Information Exchange Events

For EVERY scene where a PC talks to an NPC, build this matrix:

Scene: [PC] meets [NPC] at [Location]
├── What PC SHARED (explicitly stated in PlayerNotes)
│   └── List each piece of information with the exact phrasing from the notes
├── What PC WITHHELD or REFUSED to share
│   └── Note what was asked for and refused, with the reason if given
├── What NPC GAINED (cross-ref with Session prep — did the NPC learn something they were specifically after?)
│   └── Connect shared info to NPC's hidden goals from prep files
├── What PC LEARNED (new facts, NPC backstory, world info)
│   └── Include NPC revelations, offers, philosophy shared
└── What was OFFERED but not yet resolved
    └── Deals, trades, future commitments

Critical: PlayerNotes are written colloquially with typos and phonetic spellings. Cross-reference NPC and location names against existing vault notes to get canonical spellings.

Phase 3: Draft the Chronicle Entry

Write the entry following the established Chronicle format:

  • ### ~[Date] [Month] — [Event Title] headings
  • Bullet points with [[wikilinks]] to all NPCs, locations, factions
  • Bold section markers for information exchange: use **What [PC] shared:**, **What [NPC] learned:**, **What [PC] did NOT share:** when a scene involves significant information exchange
  • Keep entries factual and precise — the Chronicle is not prose, it's a record

Phase 4: Cross-Reference Check

Before presenting the draft, verify against the PlayerNotes:

  • Every NPC interaction has its information exchange captured
  • Every deal/offer/refusal is recorded with both sides
  • No intelligence gained by NPCs is omitted (cross-ref with Session prep hidden goals)
  • No new facts learned by PCs are omitted
  • In-game dates are consistent with any vault-tracked calendar
  • All entity names use canonical vault spellings with correct [[wikilinks]]
  • Metadata from PlayerNotes (XP, skill training, downtime activities) is translated into narrative facts where relevant (e.g., "5 XP for [[PC One]]" becomes training/downtime activities)

Phase 5: Present and Write

  1. Show the draft to the GM with the information exchange matrix for review
  2. Apply edits based on GM feedback
  3. Write to PC/Campaign_Chronicle.md in the correct chronological position
  4. Commit with a descriptive message if the vault is git-tracked

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Flattening conversations into "they met and talked" — the whole point of this skill is to prevent this
  2. Missing what NPCs learned — PlayerNotes only show the player's POV. Cross-reference Session prep to understand what the NPC was fishing for and whether they got it
  3. Conflating "offered" with "accepted" — if a deal was offered but refused, both the offer AND the refusal must be in the Chronicle
  4. Losing the reason for refusals — "[[PC One]] refused" is incomplete. "[[PC One]] refused because [[PC Two]] argued the information was more valuable" is precise
  5. Ignoring accidental information leaks — if a PC mentioned something in passing that an NPC reacted to (per player notes), that's intelligence the NPC gained, even if the PC didn't intend to share it

Updating Existing Entries

When fixing an existing Chronicle entry (not writing a new one):

  1. Read the current entry with vault_read_section on the Chronicle (or a Read of only its lines), not the whole Chronicle
  2. Read the corresponding PlayerNotes
  3. Build the information exchange matrix
  4. Identify what's missing from the current entry
  5. Rewrite only the affected section, preserving surrounding entries. Edit works after a partial Read, so read only the lines you change.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.