reviewer-data
Skill0 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review data and content files the app reads: JSON (tuning and balance values, word lists, content, fixtures, asset manifests), CSV, and plain-text lists such as blocklists. Use when reviewing changes to these files, or when the user types /reviewer-data. Catches invalid syntax, schema and type drift, silent duplicate keys, renamed ids that orphan saved progress, keys that no longer match the code, hand edits to generated files, out-of-range values, offensive or mistranslated content, and missing attribution. Part of the reviewer bundle.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-scaffoldingSkill
- comment-hygieneSkill
- microfrontendsSkill
- reviewer-cloudflareSkill
- reviewer-docsSkill
- reviewer-godotSkill
- reviewer-pythonSkill
- reviewer-readabilitySkill
- reviewer-shellSkill
- reviewer-toolingSkill
- reviewer-unitySkill
- reviewer-webSkill
- reviewerSkill
- startup-scriptSkill
- typed-blocksSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Check that it parses: python3 -m json.tool <file> >/dev/null or jq empty <file>.
- Very specific: line 26
Every record has the fields its reader requires, with consistent types.
- Distinctive: line 30
No duplicate ids or rows.
- Distinctive: line 52
No secrets or personal data.
- Very specific: line 73
Use the reviewer format: [severity] path:line — problem, then failure: (the concrete input, state or platform → wrong result) and fix: (the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Data reviewer
Scope: JSON the app or its tools read (tuning.json, data/*.json, fixtures, asset manifests), *.csv, and line-based lists. package.json and other tooling JSON go to reviewer-tooling.
Before reviewing
- Find who reads each changed file (grep for its name) and who writes it (a generator script or hand edits).
- Check that it parses:
python3 -m json.tool <file> >/dev/nullorjq empty <file>. For CSV, usepython3 -cwith thecsvmodule and check that the column count is the same on every row.
Checklist
Syntax and encoding
- JSON has no trailing commas or comments, unless the reader accepts JSONC.
- CSV quotes fields that contain commas, quotes or newlines, and keeps one header row.
- UTF-8 without a BOM unless the reader expects one. LF line endings.
Schema and types
- Every record has the fields its reader requires, with consistent types.
"10"is not10. - Some loaders return every JSON number as a float (Godot's
JSON). Integer comparisons and dictionary keys then need normalizing, so flag code-side assumptions. - Enum-like values come from the set the code handles.
- JSON objects silently keep the last of two duplicate keys. Find duplicates with a parser that rejects them (
json.load(f, object_pairs_hook=…)). - No duplicate ids or rows.
Compatibility
- Ids that saved progress, user data or other files reference are never renamed or reused. Removed items stay tolerated by the loader.
- A key renamed in the data but not in the code (or the reverse) silently falls back to the default. Grep both sides.
- Version fields that must increase (
versionCode, schema versions) do increase.
Values
- Numbers are in a sane range, with a clear unit. Check a changed balance value against how the code uses it: a divisor of 0, a negative cost, a cap below its floor.
- URLs and paths in config resolve.
Generated files
- Files a pipeline generates are regenerated, not hand-edited. Hand edits vanish on the next run. Corrections belong in the pipeline's override file.
- The diff size fits the change, and the metadata (build date, source versions) moved with it.
Content
- User-facing strings: spelling, translations, articles and plurals for language content, and no offensive or blocklisted words.
- Third-party data keeps its attribution and licence terms (CC BY-SA needs credit and share-alike) in the place the project records it.
- No secrets or personal data.
Reviewability
- Rows and keys stay in a stable order, so diffs show real changes.
- Very large files: check the size the bundle or repo can take.
Readability
Apply reviewer-readability to the same files (names, structure, dead code, and whether comments are true, needed and well-shaped), plus:
- Field names follow one case convention across the file and the code that reads it.
- JSON has no comments, so the meaning and unit of each tuning value must be clear from its name or documented where the code reads it. A rationale or
notecolumn in CSV override files is filled in.
Not findings
- Formatting differences that a stable generator produces.
- Key order in JSON that nothing depends on.
Report
Use the reviewer format: [severity] path:line — problem, then failure: (the concrete input, state or platform → wrong result) and fix: (the smallest change). Most severe first. Prove each finding before reporting it, and say No findings with what you checked when there are none.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

