gstack-retro
Skill2 starsChanged 23 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Weekly engineering retrospective. (gstack)
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- robertkarl/rkstackedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- sagnikmitra/skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 8, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- robertkarl/rkstack★ 024% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- sagnikmitra/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- caveman-commitSkill
- caveman-reviewSkill
- cavemanSkill
- gstack-autoplanSkill
- gstack-carefulSkill
- gstack-csoSkill
- gstack-design-reviewSkill
- gstack-freezeSkill
- gstack-guardSkill
- gstack-investigateSkill
- gstack-office-hoursSkill
- gstack-plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- gstack-plan-design-reviewSkill
- gstack-plan-devex-reviewSkill
- gstack-plan-eng-reviewSkill
- gstack-qaSkill
- gstack-reviewSkill
- gstack-shipSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-superpowersSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
- tandem-db-safetySkill
- tandem-harnessSkill
- tandem-reviewSkill
- tandem-worktree-etiquetteSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
41 rules. About 0 are common, 25 are distinctive, and 16 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈25
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
16
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective".
- Distinctive: line 28
If the URL contains "github.com" → platform is GitHub
- Distinctive: line 29
If the URL contains "gitlab" → platform is GitLab
- Very specific: line 48
If that fails: git rev-parse --verify origin/main 2>/dev/null → use main
- Distinctive: line 51
If all fail, fall back to main.
- Very specific: line 64
When the user types /retro, run this skill.
- Very specific: line 83
Argument validation: If the argument doesn't match a number followed by d, h, or w, the word compare (optionally followed by a window), or …
- Distinctive: line 110
When the most productive hours are and what drives them
- Distinctive: line 119
Commit type mix and what it reveals
- Distinctive: line 125
Test LOC ratio trend
- Very specific: line 133
If prior retro exists and has test_health: show delta "Test count: {last} → {now} (+{delta})"
- Distinctive: line 134
If test ratio < 20%: flag as growth area — "100% test coverage is the goal.
- Distinctive: line 137
Check review JSONL logs for plan completion data from /ship runs this period:
- Distinctive: line 145
If plan completion data exists within the retro time window:
- Distinctive: line 157
If no plan data exists, skip this section silently.
- Very specific: line 191
AI collaboration note: If many commits have Co-Authored-By AI trailers (e.g., Claude, Copilot), note the AI-assisted commit percentage as a …
- Very specific: line 212
When the user runs /retro global (or /retro global 14d), follow this flow instead of the repo-scoped Steps 1-14.
- Very specific: line 231
If no binary is found, tell the user: "Discovery script not found.
- Very specific: line 238
Read the stderr output from /tmp/gstack-discover-stderr for diagnostic info.
- Very specific: line 240
If total_sessions is 0, say: "No AI coding sessions found in the last <window>.
- Distinctive: line 314
Use the user identity from git config user.name to filter all per-repo git data.
- Distinctive: line 350
Only show repos where the user has commits.
- Very specific: line 352
Never truncate repo names: Use the full repo name (e.g., analyze_transcripts not analyze_trans).
- Distinctive: line 364
Do NOT include team members, project totals, or context switching data here.
- Very specific: line 366
Personal streak: Use the user's own commits across all repos (filtered by --author) to compute a personal streak, separate from the team …
- Distinctive: line 404
If the user is the only contributor, say "Solo project — all commits are yours." If the user has 0 commits in a repo (team project they …
- Distinctive: line 405
If the user has 0 commits in a repo (team project they didn't touch this period), say "No commits this period — [N] AI sessions only." and …
- Distinctive: line 448
If a matching prior retro exists, load it with the Read tool.
- Distinctive: line 450
If no prior global retros exist, append: "First global retro recorded — run again next week to see trends."
- Very specific: line 466
Use the Write tool to save JSON to ~/.gstack/retros/global-${today}-${next}.json:
- Very specific: line 501
When the user runs /retro compare (or /retro compare 14d):
- Distinctive: line 506
Write a brief narrative highlighting the biggest improvements and regressions
- Distinctive: line 517
Never compare teammates against each other negatively.
- Distinctive: line 518
Keep total output around 3000-4500 words (slightly longer to accommodate team sections)
- Distinctive: line 519
Use markdown tables and code blocks for data, prose for narrative
- Very specific: line 524
ALL narrative output goes directly to the user in the conversation.
- Very specific: line 525
Use origin/<default> for all git queries (not local main which may be stale)
- Distinctive: line 527
If the window has zero commits, say so and suggest a different window
- Distinctive: line 529
Treat merge commits as PR boundaries
- Distinctive: line 530
Do not read CLAUDE.md or other docs — this skill is self-contained
- Very specific: line 532
Global mode: Does NOT require being inside a git repo.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tandem vendoring note. Vendored from gstack (MIT, (c) Garry Tan, https://github.com/garrytan/gstack @ a3259400). The upstream Claude-Code-specific boilerplate (telemetry, session tracking, update checks, plan-mode hooks, learnings/brain sync) was removed; the workflow itself is unchanged. Paths below are relative to this skill's directory; sibling skills live at
../<id>/(ids are prefixedgstack-).$GSTACK_ROOTis an optional upstream gstack install (default~/.claude/skills/gstack) needed only for optional helpers such as thebrowsebinary; skip any step that needs it when it is absent. "Ask the user" means a plain chat question when no structured question tool exists.
When to invoke this skill
Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint.
Step 0: Detect platform and base branch
First, detect the git hosting platform from the remote URL:
git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null- If the URL contains "github.com" → platform is GitHub
- If the URL contains "gitlab" → platform is GitLab
- Otherwise, check CLI availability:
gh auth status 2>/dev/nullsucceeds → platform is GitHub (covers GitHub Enterprise)glab auth status 2>/dev/nullsucceeds → platform is GitLab (covers self-hosted)- Neither → unknown (use git-native commands only)
Determine which branch this PR/MR targets, or the repo's default branch if no PR/MR exists. Use the result as "the base branch" in all subsequent steps.
If GitHub:
gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName— if succeeds, use itgh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name— if succeeds, use it
If GitLab:
glab mr view -F json 2>/dev/nulland extract thetarget_branchfield — if succeeds, use itglab repo view -F json 2>/dev/nulland extract thedefault_branchfield — if succeeds, use it
Git-native fallback (if unknown platform, or CLI commands fail):
git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'- If that fails:
git rev-parse --verify origin/main 2>/dev/null→ usemain - If that fails:
git rev-parse --verify origin/master 2>/dev/null→ usemaster
If all fail, fall back to main.
Print the detected base branch name. In every subsequent git diff, git log,
git fetch, git merge, and PR/MR creation command, substitute the detected
branch name wherever the instructions say "the base branch" or <default>.
/retro — Weekly Engineering Retrospective
Generates a comprehensive engineering retrospective analyzing commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics. Team-aware: identifies the user running the command, then analyzes every contributor with per-person praise and growth opportunities. Designed for a senior IC/CTO-level builder using Claude Code as a force multiplier.
User-invocable
When the user types /retro, run this skill.
Arguments
/retro— default: last 7 days/retro 24h— last 24 hours/retro 14d— last 14 days/retro 30d— last 30 days/retro compare— compare current window vs prior same-length window/retro compare 14d— compare with explicit window/retro global— cross-project retro across all AI coding tools (7d default)/retro global 14d— cross-project retro with explicit window
Instructions
Parse the argument to determine the time window. Default to 7 days if no argument given. All times should be reported in the user's local timezone (use the system default — do NOT set TZ).
Midnight-aligned windows: For day (d) and week (w) units, compute an absolute start date at local midnight, not a relative string. For example, if today is 2026-03-18 and the window is 7 days: the start date is 2026-03-11. Use --since="2026-03-11T00:00:00" for git log queries — the explicit T00:00:00 suffix ensures git starts from midnight. Without it, git uses the current wall-clock time (e.g., --since="2026-03-11" at 11pm means 11pm, not midnight). For week units, multiply by 7 to get days (e.g., 2w = 14 days back). For hour (h) units, use --since="N hours ago" since midnight alignment does not apply to sub-day windows.
Argument validation: If the argument doesn't match a number followed by d, h, or w, the word compare (optionally followed by a window), or the word global (optionally followed by a window), show this usage and stop:
Usage: /retro [window | compare | global]
/retro — last 7 days (default)
/retro 24h — last 24 hours
/retro 14d — last 14 days
/retro 30d — last 30 days
/retro compare — compare this period vs prior period
/retro compare 14d — compare with explicit window
/retro global — cross-project retro across all AI tools (7d default)
/retro global 14d — cross-project retro with explicit windowIf the first argument is global: Skip the normal repo-scoped retro (Steps 1-14). Instead, follow the Global Retrospective flow at the end of this document. The optional second argument is the time window (default 7d). This mode does NOT require being inside a git repo.
Engineering Retro: [date range]
Summary Table
(from Step 2)
Trends vs Last Retro
(from Step 11, loaded before save — skip if first retro)
Time & Session Patterns
(from Steps 3-4)
Narrative interpreting what the team-wide patterns mean:
- When the most productive hours are and what drives them
- Whether sessions are getting longer or shorter over time
- Estimated hours per day of active coding (team aggregate)
- Notable patterns: do team members code at the same time or in shifts?
Shipping Velocity
(from Steps 5-7)
Narrative covering:
- Commit type mix and what it reveals
- PR size distribution and what it reveals about shipping cadence
- Fix-chain detection (sequences of fix commits on the same subsystem)
- Version bump discipline
Code Quality Signals
- Test LOC ratio trend
- Hotspot analysis (are the same files churning?)
- Greptile signal ratio and trend (if history exists): "Greptile: X% signal (Y valid catches, Z false positives)"
Test Health
- Total test files: N (from command 10)
- Tests added this period: M (from command 12 — test files changed)
- Regression test commits: list
test(qa):andtest(design):andtest: coveragecommits from command 11 - If prior retro exists and has
test_health: show delta "Test count: {last} → {now} (+{delta})" - If test ratio < 20%: flag as growth area — "100% test coverage is the goal. Tests make vibe coding safe."
Plan Completion
Check review JSONL logs for plan completion data from /ship runs this period:
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true # zsh compat
eval "$($GSTACK_ROOT/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)"
cat ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-reviews.jsonl 2>/dev/null | grep '"skill":"ship"' | grep '"plan_items_total"' || echo "NO_PLAN_DATA"If plan completion data exists within the retro time window:
- Count branches shipped with plans (entries that have
plan_items_total> 0) - Compute average completion: sum of
plan_items_done/ sum ofplan_items_total - Identify most-skipped item category if data supports it
Output:
Plan Completion This Period:
{N} branches shipped with plans
Average completion: {X}% ({done}/{total} items)If no plan data exists, skip this section silently.
Focus & Highlights
(from Step 8)
- Focus score with interpretation
- Ship of the week callout
Your Week (personal deep-dive)
(from Step 9, for the current user only)
This is the section the user cares most about. Include:
- Their personal commit count, LOC, test ratio
- Their session patterns and peak hours
- Their focus areas
- Their biggest ship
- What you did well (2-3 specific things anchored in commits)
- Where to level up (1-2 specific, actionable suggestions)
Team Breakdown
(from Step 9, for each teammate — skip if solo repo)
For each teammate (sorted by commits descending), write a section:
[Name]
- What they shipped: 2-3 sentences on their contributions, areas of focus, and commit patterns
- Praise: 1-2 specific things they did well, anchored in actual commits. Be genuine — what would you actually say in a 1:1? Examples:
- "Cleaned up the entire auth module in 3 small, reviewable PRs — textbook decomposition"
- "Added integration tests for every new endpoint, not just happy paths"
- "Fixed the N+1 query that was causing 2s load times on the dashboard"
- Opportunity for growth: 1 specific, constructive suggestion. Frame as investment, not criticism. Examples:
- "Test coverage on the payment module is at 8% — worth investing in before the next feature lands on top of it"
- "Most commits land in a single burst — spacing work across the day could reduce context-switching fatigue"
- "All commits land between 1-4am — sustainable pace matters for code quality long-term"
AI collaboration note: If many commits have Co-Authored-By AI trailers (e.g., Claude, Copilot), note the AI-assisted commit percentage as a team metric. Frame it neutrally — "N% of commits were AI-assisted" — without judgment.
Top 3 Team Wins
Identify the 3 highest-impact things shipped in the window across the whole team. For each:
- What it was
- Who shipped it
- Why it matters (product/architecture impact)
3 Things to Improve
Specific, actionable, anchored in actual commits. Mix personal and team-level suggestions. Phrase as "to get even better, the team could..."
3 Habits for Next Week
Small, practical, realistic. Each must be something that takes <5 minutes to adopt. At least one should be team-oriented (e.g., "review each other's PRs same-day").
Week-over-Week Trends
(if applicable, from Step 10)
Global Retrospective Mode
When the user runs /retro global (or /retro global 14d), follow this flow instead of the repo-scoped Steps 1-14. This mode works from any directory — it does NOT require being inside a git repo.
Global Step 1: Compute time window
Same midnight-aligned logic as the regular retro. Default 7d. The second argument after global is the window (e.g., 14d, 30d, 24h).
Global Step 2: Run discovery
Locate and run the discovery script using this fallback chain:
DISCOVER_BIN=""
[ -x $GSTACK_ROOT/bin/gstack-global-discover ] && DISCOVER_BIN=$GSTACK_ROOT/bin/gstack-global-discover
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && [ -x $GSTACK_ROOT/bin/gstack-global-discover ] && DISCOVER_BIN=$GSTACK_ROOT/bin/gstack-global-discover
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && which gstack-global-discover >/dev/null 2>&1 && DISCOVER_BIN=$(which gstack-global-discover)
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && [ -f bin/gstack-global-discover.ts ] && DISCOVER_BIN="bun run bin/gstack-global-discover.ts"
echo "DISCOVER_BIN: $DISCOVER_BIN"If no binary is found, tell the user: "Discovery script not found. Run bun run build in the gstack directory to compile it." and stop.
Run the discovery:
$DISCOVER_BIN --since "<window>" --format json 2>/tmp/gstack-discover-stderrRead the stderr output from /tmp/gstack-discover-stderr for diagnostic info. Parse the JSON output from stdout.
If total_sessions is 0, say: "No AI coding sessions found in the last <window>. Try a longer window: /retro global 30d" and stop.
Global Step 3: Run git log on each discovered repo
For each repo in the discovery JSON's repos array, find the first valid path in paths[] (directory exists with .git/). If no valid path exists, skip the repo and note it.
For local-only repos (where remote starts with local:): skip git fetch and use the local default branch. Use git log HEAD instead of git log origin/$DEFAULT.
For repos with remotes:
git -C <path> fetch origin --quiet 2>/dev/nullDetect the default branch for each repo: first try git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD, then check common branch names (main, master), then fall back to git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD. Use the detected branch as <default> in the commands below.
# Commits with stats
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%H|%aN|%ai|%s" --shortstat
# Commit timestamps for session detection, streak, and context switching
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%at|%aN|%ai|%s" | sort -n
# Per-author commit counts
git -C <path> shortlog origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" -sn --no-merges
# PR/MR numbers from commit messages (GitHub #NNN, GitLab !NNN)
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%s" | grep -oE '[#!][0-9]+' | sort -t'#' -k1 | uniqFor repos that fail (deleted paths, network errors): skip and note "N repos could not be reached."
Global Step 4: Compute global shipping streak
For each repo, get commit dates (capped at 365 days):
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="365 days ago" --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -uUnion all dates across all repos. Count backward from today — how many consecutive days have at least one commit to ANY repo? If the streak hits 365 days, display as "365+ days".
Global Step 5: Compute context switching metric
From the commit timestamps gathered in Step 3, group by date. For each date, count how many distinct repos had commits that day. Report:
- Average repos/day
- Maximum repos/day
- Which days were focused (1 repo) vs. fragmented (3+ repos)
Global Step 6: Per-tool productivity patterns
From the discovery JSON, analyze tool usage patterns:
- Which AI tool is used for which repos (exclusive vs. shared)
- Session count per tool
- Behavioral patterns (e.g., "Codex used exclusively for myapp, Claude Code for everything else")
Global Step 7: Aggregate and generate narrative
Structure the output with the shareable personal card first, then the full team/project breakdown below. The personal card is designed to be screenshot-friendly — everything someone would want to share on X/Twitter in one clean block.
Tweetable summary (first line, before everything else):
Week of Mar 14: 5 projects, 138 commits, 250k LOC across 5 repos | 48 AI sessions | Streak: 52d 🔥🚀 Your Week: [user name] — [date range]
This section is the shareable personal card. It contains ONLY the current user's stats — no team data, no project breakdowns. Designed to screenshot and post.
Use the user identity from git config user.name to filter all per-repo git data.
Aggregate across all repos to compute personal totals.
Render as a single visually clean block. Left border only — no right border (LLMs can't align right borders reliably). Pad repo names to the longest name so columns align cleanly. Never truncate project names.
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
║ [USER NAME] — Week of [date]
╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
║
║ [N] commits across [M] projects
║ +[X]k LOC added · [Y]k LOC deleted · [Z]k net
║ [N] AI coding sessions (CC: X, Codex: Y, Gemini: Z)
║ [N]-day shipping streak 🔥
║
║ PROJECTS
║ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
║ [repo_name_full] [N] commits +[X]k LOC [solo/team]
║ [repo_name_full] [N] commits +[X]k LOC [solo/team]
║ [repo_name_full] [N] commits +[X]k LOC [solo/team]
║
║ SHIP OF THE WEEK
║ [PR title] — [LOC] lines across [N] files
║
║ TOP WORK
║ • [1-line description of biggest theme]
║ • [1-line description of second theme]
║ • [1-line description of third theme]
║
║ Powered by gstack
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Rules for the personal card:
- Only show repos where the user has commits. Skip repos with 0 commits.
- Sort repos by user's commit count descending.
- Never truncate repo names. Use the full repo name (e.g.,
analyze_transcriptsnotanalyze_trans). Pad the name column to the longest repo name so all columns align. If names are long, widen the box — the box width adapts to content. - For LOC, use "k" formatting for thousands (e.g., "+64.0k" not "+64010").
- Role: "solo" if user is the only contributor, "team" if others contributed.
- Ship of the Week: the user's single highest-LOC PR across ALL repos.
- Top Work: 3 bullet points summarizing the user's major themes, inferred from commit messages. Not individual commits — synthesize into themes. E.g., "Built /retro global — cross-project retrospective with AI session discovery" not "feat: gstack-global-discover" + "feat: /retro global template".
- The card must be self-contained. Someone seeing ONLY this block should understand the user's week without any surrounding context.
- Do NOT include team members, project totals, or context switching data here.
Personal streak: Use the user's own commits across all repos (filtered by
--author) to compute a personal streak, separate from the team streak.
Global Engineering Retro: [date range]
Everything below is the full analysis — team data, project breakdowns, patterns. This is the "deep dive" that follows the shareable card.
All Projects Overview
| Metric | Value |
| Projects active | N |
| Total commits (all repos, all contributors) | N |
| Total LOC | +N / -N |
| AI coding sessions | N (CC: X, Codex: Y, Gemini: Z) |
| Active days | N |
| Global shipping streak (any contributor, any repo) | N consecutive days |
| Context switches/day | N avg (max: M) |
Per-Project Breakdown
For each repo (sorted by commits descending):
- Repo name (with % of total commits)
- Commits, LOC, PRs merged, top contributor
- Key work (inferred from commit messages)
- AI sessions by tool
Your Contributions (sub-section within each project):
For each project, add a "Your contributions" block showing the current user's
personal stats within that repo. Use the user identity from git config user.name
to filter. Include:
- Your commits / total commits (with %)
- Your LOC (+insertions / -deletions)
- Your key work (inferred from YOUR commit messages only)
- Your commit type mix (feat/fix/refactor/chore/docs breakdown)
- Your biggest ship in this repo (highest-LOC commit or PR)
If the user is the only contributor, say "Solo project — all commits are yours." If the user has 0 commits in a repo (team project they didn't touch this period), say "No commits this period — [N] AI sessions only." and skip the breakdown.
Format:
**Your contributions:** 47/244 commits (19%), +4.2k/-0.3k LOC
Key work: Writer Chat, email blocking, security hardening
Biggest ship: PR #605 — Writer Chat eats the admin bar (2,457 ins, 46 files)
Mix: feat(3) fix(2) chore(1)Cross-Project Patterns
- Time allocation across projects (% breakdown, use YOUR commits not total)
- Peak productivity hours aggregated across all repos
- Focused vs. fragmented days
- Context switching trends
Tool Usage Analysis
Per-tool breakdown with behavioral patterns:
- Claude Code: N sessions across M repos — patterns observed
- Codex: N sessions across M repos — patterns observed
- Gemini: N sessions across M repos — patterns observed
Ship of the Week (Global)
Highest-impact PR across ALL projects. Identify by LOC and commit messages.
3 Cross-Project Insights
What the global view reveals that no single-repo retro could show.
3 Habits for Next Week
Considering the full cross-project picture.
Global Step 8: Load history & compare
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true # zsh compat
ls -t ~/.gstack/retros/global-*.json 2>/dev/null | head -5Only compare against a prior retro with the same window value (e.g., 7d vs 7d). If the most recent prior retro has a different window, skip comparison and note: "Prior global retro used a different window — skipping comparison."
If a matching prior retro exists, load it with the Read tool. Show a Trends vs Last Global Retro table with deltas for key metrics: total commits, LOC, sessions, streak, context switches/day.
If no prior global retros exist, append: "First global retro recorded — run again next week to see trends."
Global Step 9: Save snapshot
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/retrosDetermine the next sequence number for today:
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true # zsh compat
today=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
existing=$(ls ~/.gstack/retros/global-${today}-*.json 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
next=$((existing + 1))Use the Write tool to save JSON to ~/.gstack/retros/global-${today}-${next}.json:
{
"type": "global",
"date": "2026-03-21",
"window": "7d",
"projects": [
{
"name": "gstack",
"remote": "<detected from git remote get-url origin, normalized to HTTPS>",
"commits": 47,
"insertions": 3200,
"deletions": 800,
"sessions": { "claude_code": 15, "codex": 3, "gemini": 0 }
}
],
"totals": {
"commits": 182,
"insertions": 15300,
"deletions": 4200,
"projects": 5,
"active_days": 6,
"sessions": { "claude_code": 48, "codex": 8, "gemini": 3 },
"global_streak_days": 52,
"avg_context_switches_per_day": 2.1
},
"tweetable": "Week of Mar 14: 5 projects, 182 commits, 15.3k LOC | CC: 48, Codex: 8, Gemini: 3 | Focus: gstack (58%) | Streak: 52d"
}Compare Mode
When the user runs /retro compare (or /retro compare 14d):
- Compute metrics for the current window (default 7d) using the midnight-aligned start date (same logic as the main retro — e.g., if today is 2026-03-18 and window is 7d, use
--since="2026-03-11T00:00:00") - Compute metrics for the immediately prior same-length window using both
--sinceand--untilwith midnight-aligned dates to avoid overlap (e.g., for a 7d window starting 2026-03-11: prior window is--since="2026-03-04T00:00:00" --until="2026-03-11T00:00:00") - Show a side-by-side comparison table with deltas and arrows
- Write a brief narrative highlighting the biggest improvements and regressions
- Save only the current-window snapshot to
.context/retros/(same as a normal retro run); do not persist the prior-window metrics.
Tone
- Encouraging but candid, no coddling
- Specific and concrete — always anchor in actual commits/code
- Skip generic praise ("great job!") — say exactly what was good and why
- Frame improvements as leveling up, not criticism
- Praise should feel like something you'd actually say in a 1:1 — specific, earned, genuine
- Growth suggestions should feel like investment advice — "this is worth your time because..." not "you failed at..."
- Never compare teammates against each other negatively. Each person's section stands on its own.
- Keep total output around 3000-4500 words (slightly longer to accommodate team sections)
- Use markdown tables and code blocks for data, prose for narrative
- Output directly to the conversation — do NOT write to filesystem (except the
.context/retros/JSON snapshot)
Important Rules
- ALL narrative output goes directly to the user in the conversation. The ONLY file written is the
.context/retros/JSON snapshot. - Use
origin/<default>for all git queries (not local main which may be stale) - Display all timestamps in the user's local timezone (do not override
TZ) - If the window has zero commits, say so and suggest a different window
- Round LOC/hour to nearest 50
- Treat merge commits as PR boundaries
- Do not read CLAUDE.md or other docs — this skill is self-contained
- On first run (no prior retros), skip comparison sections gracefully
- Global mode: Does NOT require being inside a git repo. Saves snapshots to
~/.gstack/retros/(not.context/retros/). Gracefully skip AI tools that aren't installed. Only compare against prior global retros with the same window value. If streak hits 365d cap, display as "365+ days".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

