techdebt
Skill1 starsChanged 26 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub
Scans the current project for duplicate code, dead code, TODOs, unused imports and inconsistent patterns. It writes a prioritized report to `tasks/techdebt.md`. Use at session end or when the user says techdebt, tech debt, cleanup, dead code or duplicated code.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jh941213/my-cc-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jh941213/ADLC-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- LucasCooperBey/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- DoubleML/doubleml-for-pytheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- jh941213/my-claude-code-assettheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- DataDog/dd-trace-javatheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use docs-ci, docs-interfaces and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
jh941213Skilldocs-ci
문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-interfaces
API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.
Also in 3 projects that use this
RachaelQuiselSkillclient-docs
Client documentation. Use when a build needs documentation updates or missing project documents need to be identified.
Also in 3 projects that use this
planailabsSkilldocs-architecture
Layout, build pipeline, and structural gotchas for this dual-Astro repo. Read before changing structure, routing, or adding content. Operational/dev-server questions → dev-build skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
yu-iskwSkilltest-and-fix
Run unit tests and automatically fix code failures, regression bugs, or test mismatches. Use when tests are failing, after implementing new features, or to repair "broken" tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
llama-farmSkillcommit-push-pr
Commit changes, push to GitHub, and open a PR. Includes quality checks (security, patterns, simplification). Use --quick to skip checks.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +4 more from jh941213
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- DoubleML/doubleml-for-py★ 798same name
- DataDog/dd-trace-java★ 739same name
- chenzhen7/akari★ 232same name
- jh941213/ADLC-harness★ 125same name
- jh941213/my-cc-harness★ 125same name
- jh941213/my-claude-code-asset★ 125same name
- aromanarguello/roman-skills★ 18same name
- rayketcham-lab/qn-claude-web★ 2same name
- almax000/claude-skills★ 1same name
- LucasCooperBey/claude-skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-research-assistantSkill
- answer-sheetSkill
- app-graphicsSkill
- app-landing-pageSkill
- app-screenshotsSkill
- break-uiSkill
- consumer-app-from-behaviorSkill
- cross-language-safetySkill
- dart-tool-scriptsSkill
- decision-sweepSkill
- engineering-diarySkill
- figma-review-loopSkill
- flutter-app-size-auditSkill
- flutter-async-at-the-edgeSkill
- flutter-async-cubit-safetySkill
- flutter-bloc-clean-architectureSkill
- flutter-clean-architecture-tddSkill
- flutter-cubit-smart-cachingSkill
- flutter-error-logging-conventionsSkill
- flutter-observability-instrumentationSkill
- flutter-paywall-and-review-timingSkill
- flutter-precommit-cleanupSkill
- flutter-router-decisionSkill
- flutter-runtime-safetySkill
- flutter-shorebird-otaSkill
- flutter-stream-architectureSkill
- flutter-strict-analysisSkill
- flutter-web-first-paintSkill
- forced-pivot-15-daySkill
- gplay-consoleSkill
- ios-distribution-feature-flagsSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- launch-watchSkill
- locale-expert-reviewSkill
- market-pulseSkill
- mobile-ui-referenceSkill
- moscow-prioritizationSkill
- orchestrate-agentic-engineeringSkill
- parallel-agent-inboxSkill
- paywall-conversion-flowSkill
- paywall-transparencySkill
- proactive-crash-repair-loopSkill
- promise-auditSkill
- pr-preview-shippingSkill
- ship-first-dollar-appSkill
- slim-ios-simulator-fleetSkill
- spec-sql-harnessSkill
- store-launch-mastermindSkill
- sync-contextSkill
- task-blitzSkill
- vendor-decisionSkill
- web-interface-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
If inside a git repo: audit that project root
- Very specific: line 18
If not in a project: audit recently modified files.
- Distinctive: line 23
Use subagents to scan in parallel:
- Very specific: line 78
When several findings share one cause, group them under one proposed fix, written above the findings it solves, each finding with its …
- Distinctive: line 79
Keep this grouped list as a decision log in the report, so a long session can resume after compaction without rereading the code.
- Distinctive: line 83
After writing the report, ask:
- Distinctive: line 87
If yes: fix critical items first, then offer high-priority items.
- Distinctive: line 91
Do NOT refactor working code unless it's clearly duplicated or dead
- Distinctive: line 92
Do NOT add TODOs — the report itself is the record
- Distinctive: line 93
Run this at the end of every development session
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tech Debt Audit
The idea comes from tip 4 in Boris Cherny's Claude Code team tips: a /techdebt command run at the end of every session.
You have been invoked to perform a tech debt audit of the current project.
Process
1. Identify Scope
- If inside a git repo: audit that project root
- If not in a project: audit recently modified files; write to
~/.claude/tasks/techdebt-global.md - Output file:
tasks/techdebt.md(relative to project root)
2. Scan for Issues
Use subagents to scan in parallel:
Agent A — Duplication
- Find functions/methods with near-identical logic
- Find copy-pasted blocks (10+ lines repeated 2+ times)
- Find duplicate type definitions or constants
Agent B — Dead Code
- Exported symbols never imported elsewhere
- Functions defined but never called
- Variables assigned but never read
- Commented-out code blocks older than obvious debugging
Agent C — Hygiene
- TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX comments — list each with file:line
- Unused imports/dependencies
- Inconsistent naming patterns (camelCase vs snake_case in same file)
- Magic numbers/strings that should be constants
3. Prioritize Findings
| Priority | Criteria | Action |
| Critical | Dead code, duplicate logic causing bugs | Remove immediately |
| High | Duplicate functions, unused exports | Refactor this session |
| Low | TODOs, style inconsistencies, magic values | Note for later |
4. Write Report
Create tasks/techdebt.md with:
# Tech Debt Report — [DATE]
## Critical (remove now)
- [file:line] description
## High (refactor soon)
- [file:line] description
## Low (note for later)
- [file:line] description
## Stats
- Files scanned: N
- Issues found: N critical, N high, N low- When several findings share one cause, group them under one proposed fix, written above the findings it solves, each finding with its
file:line. - Keep this grouped list as a decision log in the report, so a long session can resume after compaction without rereading the code.
5. Offer to Fix
After writing the report, ask:
"I found N critical and N high-priority issues. Should I fix the critical ones now?"
If yes: fix critical items first, then offer high-priority items.
Notes
- Do NOT refactor working code unless it's clearly duplicated or dead
- Do NOT add TODOs — the report itself is the record
- Run this at the end of every development session
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

