parallel-agent-inbox
Skill1 starsChanged 26 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub
Runs many coding-agent threads as an inbox: fires problems, isolates work, and only attends when done or blocked. Use when juggling parallel agent tasks, derisking merges, or keeping work going after the laptop closes. Also use when threads pile up, agents collide on the same checkout, or review waits dominate throughput.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-research-assistantSkill
- answer-sheetSkill
- app-graphicsSkill
- app-landing-pageSkill
- app-screenshotsSkill
- break-uiSkill
- consumer-app-from-behaviorSkill
- cross-language-safetySkill
- dart-tool-scriptsSkill
- decision-sweepSkill
- engineering-diarySkill
- figma-review-loopSkill
- flutter-app-size-auditSkill
- flutter-async-at-the-edgeSkill
- flutter-async-cubit-safetySkill
- flutter-bloc-clean-architectureSkill
- flutter-clean-architecture-tddSkill
- flutter-cubit-smart-cachingSkill
- flutter-error-logging-conventionsSkill
- flutter-observability-instrumentationSkill
- flutter-paywall-and-review-timingSkill
- flutter-precommit-cleanupSkill
- flutter-router-decisionSkill
- flutter-runtime-safetySkill
- flutter-shorebird-otaSkill
- flutter-stream-architectureSkill
- flutter-strict-analysisSkill
- flutter-web-first-paintSkill
- forced-pivot-15-daySkill
- gplay-consoleSkill
- ios-distribution-feature-flagsSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- launch-watchSkill
- locale-expert-reviewSkill
- market-pulseSkill
- mobile-ui-referenceSkill
- moscow-prioritizationSkill
- orchestrate-agentic-engineeringSkill
- paywall-conversion-flowSkill
- paywall-transparencySkill
- proactive-crash-repair-loopSkill
- promise-auditSkill
- pr-preview-shippingSkill
- ship-first-dollar-appSkill
- slim-ios-simulator-fleetSkill
- spec-sql-harnessSkill
- store-launch-mastermindSkill
- sync-contextSkill
- task-blitzSkill
- techdebtSkill
- vendor-decisionSkill
- web-interface-reviewSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
26 rules. About 0 are common, 26 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈26
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 11
Keep many coding-agent threads in flight without becoming the bottleneck.
- Distinctive: line 12
Treat each thread as a task in an inbox: send a problem with enough context to finish, isolate the checkout, ignore it while it works, and …
- Distinctive: line 23
Use the project's existing agent host, CI, and git workflow.
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not require a specific IDE brand.
- Distinctive: line 31
Prefer one stable network path for subscription-backed coding tools when the provider is sensitive to datacenter IPs.
- Distinctive: line 37
When a bug, feature, or question appears:
- Distinctive: line 41
Ask whether a simple approach already exists before prescribing files and diffs.
- Distinctive: line 42
If the agent solves it, spend human time reviewing.
- Distinctive: line 43
If it fails, that failure is the signal to think harder yourself.
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not wait until you have designed the solution before involving the agent.
- Distinctive: line 52
Run the relevant checks.
- Distinctive: line 58
Add only the tools and repo context required for that outcome.
- Distinctive: line 62
Default each active thread to its own worktree or otherwise isolated checkout and branch.
- Distinctive: line 63
Do not put two writers on the same dirty tree.
- Distinctive: line 64
If git or worktree collisions appear, let the agent recover unless it is stuck after a clear retry.
- Distinctive: line 73
After a decision (merge, follow-up, drop), clear the thread from the active inbox (settle/archive).
- Distinctive: line 81
Use exploratory or "silly" prompts only when quota would otherwise expire unused and the work cannot harm production.
- Distinctive: line 82
Keep secrets, customer data, and production credentials out of prompts unless the user explicitly authorizes that path.
- Distinctive: line 86
Before handing a task to a cloud-hosted agent, list every host the task must reach and check the sandbox allows each one.
- Distinctive: line 93
Keep signing secrets on the CI runner, never in a cloud agent sandbox.
- Distinctive: line 97
Do not stack or share accounts to evade provider terms, and do not turn coding subs into a public API.
- Distinctive: line 98
Do not auto-merge or auto-deploy without stated checks and human policy for production.
- Distinctive: line 99
Do not babysit a healthy working thread.
- Distinctive: line 100
Do not start aggressive parallel shipping if revert is slow or CI is untrusted.
- Distinctive: line 101
Do not prescribe a single vendor's UI.
- Distinctive: line 118
Read that file when provenance matters.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Parallel Agent Inbox
Keep many coding-agent threads in flight without becoming the bottleneck. Treat each thread as a task in an inbox: send a problem with enough context to finish, isolate the checkout, ignore it while it works, and only return when it is done or blocked.
Scope and handoffs
This skill covers day-to-day parallel coding throughput: prompting, isolation, review timing, and remote always-on runners.
Hand off where another skill goes deeper:
- Multi-agent product/architecture orchestration:
orchestrate-agentic-engineering. - Scheduled crash triage into fix PRs:
proactive-crash-repair-loop.
Use the project's existing agent host, CI, and git workflow. Do not require a specific IDE brand.
1. Set the operating constraints
Before spinning threads:
- Confirm auth is meant for developer coding agents, not for serving end-user inference.
- Prefer one stable network path for subscription-backed coding tools when the provider is sensitive to datacenter IPs.
- Have an always-on worker available (home Linux box or equivalent) so threads survive closing the laptop.
- Confirm revert is cheap: a bad merge must be undoable in seconds, or slow down until it is.
2. Intake problems, not patches
When a bug, feature, or question appears:
- Open a new thread immediately.
- Describe the problem, evidence, and success condition.
- Ask whether a simple approach already exists before prescribing files and diffs.
- If the agent solves it, spend human time reviewing.
- If it fails, that failure is the signal to think harder yourself.
Do not wait until you have designed the solution before involving the agent.
3. Make the next visit merge-ready
Pack the first prompt so the next time you open the thread you can decide, not drip more chores:
- Implement or investigate.
- Run the relevant checks.
- Open or update the PR.
- Attach preview/env access when needed.
- Babysit CI/review comments until green or clearly blocked.
- State merge conditions if the host may merge without you.
Add only the tools and repo context required for that outcome.
4. Isolate parallel work
Default each active thread to its own worktree or otherwise isolated checkout and branch. Do not put two writers on the same dirty tree. If git or worktree collisions appear, let the agent recover unless it is stuck after a clear retry.
5. Run the inbox loop
Human attention rules:
- Fire the thread and leave. Do not watch streaming tokens.
- Attend only to done or needs-input items.
- Working threads stay out of focus.
- After a decision (merge, follow-up, drop), clear the thread from the active inbox (settle/archive).
- Aim to end the day with only running work or an empty inbox.
Across machines, route new threads onto always-on workers when the local device will sleep or leave the network.
6. Spend tokens where they buy attention back
Bias spend toward verification, reproduction, PR triage, and unexplained diffs from teammates. Use exploratory or "silly" prompts only when quota would otherwise expire unused and the work cannot harm production. Keep secrets, customer data, and production credentials out of prompts unless the user explicitly authorizes that path.
Cloud sandbox limits
Before handing a task to a cloud-hosted agent, list every host the task must reach and check the sandbox allows each one.
Claude Code on the web (docs read 2026-10-13): api.github.com is allowed and REST through gh api works for attached repos, but GraphQL (gh pr, gh issue) and other repos return 403, and the proxy rejects pushes of anything but a branch, such as a tag.
Repo .mcp.json servers and connectors load there, while user-scope claude mcp add servers do not.
Codex cloud blocks internet access in the agent phase by default and can be set to limited or unrestricted access per environment, while setup scripts always run with internet access (the page is labeled Codex Cloud Legacy and now lives under https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/environments/cloud-environment).
Cursor cloud agents do not run Tailscale in their default networking mode.
A Tailscale auth-key join needs egress to *.tailscale.com, and ephemeral keys are single use.
A phone can show Online in tailscale status and answer pings while refusing every TCP connection. Fix it by reconnecting the phone to Wi-Fi, toggle Tailscale and keep the target app in the foreground.
Keep signing secrets on the CI runner, never in a cloud agent sandbox.
Guardrails
- Do not stack or share accounts to evade provider terms, and do not turn coding subs into a public API.
- Do not auto-merge or auto-deploy without stated checks and human policy for production.
- Do not babysit a healthy working thread.
- Do not start aggressive parallel shipping if revert is slow or CI is untrusted.
- Do not prescribe a single vendor's UI; require inbox semantics, isolation, and remote runners as capabilities.
Output contract
Return:
- Current inbox snapshot: running, needs-input, done.
- New threads filed, each with problem statement and merge-ready success condition.
- Isolation choice per thread (worktree/branch/machine).
- Verification and revert posture before more concurrency.
- Decisions taken on done items (merge, follow-up, drop) and inbox leftovers.
- Any blocked items that need human thought because the agent failed.
Source notes
Workflow distilled from Theo - t3.gg's YouTube video “If you have a Claude sub, watch this” (2026-10-02).
See references/video-notes.md for source extraction, limits, and adaptation choices.
Read that file when provenance matters.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

