refactoring-legacy-code
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when refactoring complex, untyped, tightly-coupled legacy code or migrating monolithic modules safely without breaking existing behavior.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-and-inclusive-designSkill
- animateSkill
- api-contracts-and-backward-compatSkill
- appsec-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- concurrency-and-race-conditionsSkill
- database-and-migrations-architectSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- graphifySkill
- headroomSkill
- impeccableSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- observability-and-structured-loggingSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- refactoring-legacy-codeSkill
- root-cause-analysis-and-postmortemSkill
- secret-scanningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- threat-modelingSkill
- accessibility-and-inclusive-designSkill
- animateSkill
- api-contracts-and-backward-compatSkill
- appsec-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- concurrency-and-race-conditionsSkill
- database-and-migrations-architectSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- graphifySkill
- headroomSkill
- impeccableSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- observability-and-structured-loggingSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- root-cause-analysis-and-postmortemSkill
- secret-scanningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- threat-modelingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Never perform a ground-up rewrite.
- Distinctive: line 11
Before changing ANY logic, wrap the legacy module in automated snapshot tests using real production-like inputs.
- Distinctive: line 19
Write the new implementation alongside the legacy implementation.
- Distinctive: line 25
Verify that all characterization tests and unit tests remain green.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Legacy Code Refactoring (Strangler Fig)
Never perform a ground-up rewrite. Safely decouple and modernize legacy systems step by step:
1. Characterization Testing (Golden Master)
- Before changing ANY logic, wrap the legacy module in automated snapshot tests using real production-like inputs.
- Record existing outputs (including known quirks/bugs) as the baseline standard of truth.
2. Identify the Seam & Define Clean Interface
- Identify the clean boundary where legacy code receives input and returns output.
- Define a type-safe interface or TypeScript contract representing the modern desired API.
3. Strangler Fig Migration Pattern
- Write the new implementation alongside the legacy implementation.
- Route a small slice of traffic or callers through the new implementation.
- Compare outputs in shadow mode or feature flags if the domain logic is critical (billing, auth).
4. Prune Dead Legacy Branches
- Once 100% of callers utilize the new implementation, safely delete the legacy file.
- Verify that all characterization tests and unit tests remain green.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

