dependency-vulnerability-audit
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit project dependencies and lockfiles for known CVEs, malicious packages, and supply chain security vulnerabilities.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-and-inclusive-designSkill
- animateSkill
- api-contracts-and-backward-compatSkill
- appsec-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- concurrency-and-race-conditionsSkill
- database-and-migrations-architectSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- graphifySkill
- headroomSkill
- impeccableSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- observability-and-structured-loggingSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- refactoring-legacy-codeSkill
- root-cause-analysis-and-postmortemSkill
- secret-scanningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- threat-modelingSkill
- accessibility-and-inclusive-designSkill
- animateSkill
- api-contracts-and-backward-compatSkill
- appsec-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- concurrency-and-race-conditionsSkill
- database-and-migrations-architectSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- graphifySkill
- headroomSkill
- impeccableSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- observability-and-structured-loggingSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- refactoring-legacy-codeSkill
- root-cause-analysis-and-postmortemSkill
- secret-scanningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- threat-modelingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Lockfile Verification: Always commit and enforce lockfiles (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, poetry.lock, Cargo.lock) to guarantee …
- Very specific: line 12
Automated Scanning: Run npm audit, pip-audit, or cargo audit as a mandatory pre-flight gate.
- Distinctive: line 14
Typosquatting & Malicious Packages: Verify package author and download volume before introducing new dependencies.
- Distinctive: line 18
If no patch exists: Assess whether the vulnerable function is actually reachable in your code path.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency Security & Supply Chain Audit (Trail of Bits Standard)
Third-party dependencies represent the largest attack surface in modern applications:
1. Audit Strategy
- Lockfile Verification: Always commit and enforce lockfiles (
package-lock.json,pnpm-lock.yaml,poetry.lock,Cargo.lock) to guarantee deterministic reproducible builds. - Automated Scanning: Run
npm audit,pip-audit, orcargo auditas a mandatory pre-flight gate. - Direct vs Transitive Dependencies: Pin exact versions or tightly constrained ranges; periodically audit transitive dependency trees.
- Typosquatting & Malicious Packages: Verify package author and download volume before introducing new dependencies.
2. Remediation Guidelines
- For Critical or High CVEs: Update to patched versions immediately.
- If no patch exists: Assess whether the vulnerable function is actually reachable in your code path; wrap with safe validation or replace the package with native platform features (Ponytail principle).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

