agentleFS
miguelclavelmiguelclavel/ux-research-skills/skills/stakeholder-interviews/SKILL.md

stakeholder-interviews

Skill1 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Plan and synthesise stakeholder interviews to surface goals, constraints, assumptions and disagreements before design starts. Use when someone is starting a project, joining a new team, needs alignment, or wants to map business goals, risks and assumptions.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Don't treat a stakeholder's assumption about users as a finding.

    line 36

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stakeholder interviews

Most projects fail on misalignment, not on design. Talk to the people who can kill, fund or ship the work, one by one, before anything is designed.

Who

Product, engineering, data, marketing, sales or support, legal or compliance, and whoever owns the budget. In regulated products, always compliance.

Questions to cover

  1. What does success look like for you, and how would we measure it?
  2. What has been tried before, and why didn't it work?
  3. What constraints are fixed (technical, legal, brand, timeline) and which are negotiable?
  4. What do you believe about our users that we haven't proven?
  5. What worries you most about this project?
  6. Who else should I talk to?

Synthesis

  • Goals each stakeholder named, and where they conflict.
  • Constraints, labelled fixed or negotiable, with who said so.
  • Assumptions map: each belief about users, rated by how important it is and how much evidence exists. High importance plus low evidence is what research should test first.
  • Risks and who owns them.

Output

A one page alignment summary to share back with everyone, plus the assumptions map. Disagreements are named plainly, without attributing blame.

Don't

  • Don't treat a stakeholder's assumption about users as a finding.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.