agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/sre-agent/labs/zava-learning/sre-config/agent-config/skills/performance-investigation/SKILL.md

performance-investigation

Skill187 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use for Zava Learning incidents where the platform is reachable but a compute tier is degraded — elevated 5xx from the APIs, slow quiz responses, exceptions, an API with no healthy instances, or a back-office batch job failing on the reporting-worker VM (e.g. nightly grade exports). Diagnoses from Application Insights / Log Analytics / Syslog and remediates the application or worker tier.

9 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use security-review.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SentrySkill

    security-review

    Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check Container App revision health and replica counts — an API with zero replicas serves no requests and surfaces as quiz launch / 502 …

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    If the symptom is the nightly grade-export job failing (no quiz/portal impact — this is a back-office batch job on a dedicated VM …

    line 37
  3. Very specific:

    Read the quiz service's console logs (ContainerAppConsoleLogs_CL for the failing quiz-* app / assessment-api) for the request shape: a slow …

    line 56
  4. Very specific:

    Slow quiz loading (query lane, db zava_query): check the question_bank indexes — SELECT indexname FROM pg_indexes WHERE …

    line 69
  5. Very specific:

    Errors under load (pool lane, db zava): check the connecting role's connection limit — SELECT rolname,rolconnlimit FROM pg_roles WHERE …

    line 74
  6. Very specific:

    If the root cause is in application source, the app code lives under src/ in @@REPO@@.

    line 101

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Zava Learning — Application Incident Runbook

Resource Group: @@RG@@. Services (Container Apps): learner-portal, course-api, assessment-api. Quiz launch path: portal -> assessment-api -> course-api.

Confirm the network/edge is healthy first (App Gateway backend healthy, NSG clean) so you don't misattribute an app fault. Then:

  1. Query App Insights failures/exceptions filtered by the failing cloud_RoleName.
  2. Check Container App revision health and replica counts — an API with zero replicas serves no requests and surfaces as quiz launch / 502 failures with a clean network path. A revision can hit zero replicas two ways: scaled to zero, OR the active revision was deactivated (an inactive revision runs zero replicas). az containerapp revision list shows only ACTIVE revisions, so a deactivated lane looks like it has "no revisions" — list with --all and inspect properties.active / properties.latestRevisionName. The latent cause is often a scale floor of zero in IaC (appLaneMinReplicas: 0); the durable fix restores a non-zero minimum.
  3. Inspect recent revisions/config changes.
  4. For LATENCY regressions (slow quiz responses / the latency alert) on a clean network path: pull assessment-api request durations from Log Analytics console logs (each request logs ms=<duration>), find the step-change in latency and align it to the most recent assessment-api revision/image deployment, then inspect src/assessment-api/server.js for expensive synchronous work added on the request path (e.g. a synchronous KDF/crypto call). This is a code regression — mitigate live by rolling back to the prior revision, then fix durably with a code PR.

Reporting-worker grade-export failures

If the symptom is the nightly grade-export job failing (no quiz/portal impact — this is a back-office batch job on a dedicated VM vm-zava-reporting-*):

  1. Query Log Analytics Syslog for ProcessName == "zava-export" — the worker logs a heartbeat on success and a FAILED line plus the raw OS error (export write error: ...) on failure. Read the raw error to identify the failure mode.
  2. Correlate with disk telemetry: the Perf table carries Logical Disk % Used Space and Free Megabytes for the worker. A data volume (/data) at ~100% used / near-zero free is the signal that the export writes are failing for lack of space.
  3. Confirm on the VM with a read command (az vm run-command invoke ... --scripts "df -h /data").
  4. Mitigate live: free space on the worker's data disk (remove the accumulated backlog file under /data/exports) via az vm run-command. Re-check that the next export run logs a success heartbeat.
  5. Durable fix: the worker's export retention/rotation lives in src/reporting-worker/cloud-init.yaml — a PR that enforces retention (or grows the data disk in infra/modules/vm.bicep) is the lasting fix.

Database-backed quiz lanes (slow loading / errors under load / auth failures)

The quiz lanes read PostgreSQL on the request path, so a DB fault produces app-shaped symptoms on a clean edge + healthy replicas. Do NOT stop at "the DB looks slow" and report root cause unknown — identify WHICH database surface — log-first, confirm from the lane's error detail, then optionally verify in the database:

  1. Read the quiz service's console logs (ContainerAppConsoleLogs_CL for the failing quiz-* app / assessment-api) for the request shape: a slow ms=<duration> on /quiz/* → index/latency; a burst of status=500 on /quiz/* (and any pool error: lines) → a backend DB failure.
  2. Get the EXACT backend error straight from the lane — the service returns the underlying Postgres error in the response detail field (it is NOT written to the logs): curl the lane's /health (returns 503 {"status":"degraded","detail":"<pg error>"} when the DB path is broken) or /quiz/<courseId> (500 {"error":"...","detail":"<pg error>"}). The detail names the cause directly — e.g. password authentication failed (28P01) → bad DB secret; too many connections / remaining connection slots / connection-limit → pool exhaustion; a slow-but-200 /quiz with climbing ms= → missing index. This needs no DB credentials and is the primary confirmation.
  3. Optionally confirm against the database itself with a read-only query (connection recipe in the knowledge base — server/login from az postgres flexible-server list, admin password from Key Vault db-password, then az postgres flexible-server execute --querytext "<SQL>"):
    • Slow quiz loading (query lane, db zava_query): check the question_bank indexes — SELECT indexname FROM pg_indexes WHERE tablename='question_bank'; and SELECT relname,seq_scan,idx_scan FROM pg_stat_user_tables WHERE relname='question_bank';. A missing index on question_bank with seq-scans climbing is the root cause; the durable fix is to (re)build it (REINDEX/CREATE INDEX) — delivered as a PR.
    • Errors under load (pool lane, db zava): check the connecting role's connection limit — SELECT rolname,rolconnlimit FROM pg_roles WHERE rolname='app_pool'; and live connections in pg_stat_activity. A rolconnlimit of 1 (or far below the pool size) is the root cause; restore a sane limit (ALTER ROLE app_pool CONNECTION LIMIT <n>).
    • Authentication errors (secret lane): the lane's Key Vault DB secret (db-password-secretlane) was rotated to an invalid value — confirm the auth-failure log signature; the fix is to restore a valid value INTO db-password-secretlane (copy it from the baseline db-password secret with az keyvault secret set) and then force the lane to re-read it by creating a NEW revision (az containerapp update --set-env-vars FORCE_ROTATE=<timestamp>). A plain az containerapp revision restart is NOT enough — Container Apps resolve Key Vault secret references at revision-creation time, so a restart reuses the cached (still-invalid) value; only a new revision re-reads the secret. Then re-check the lane returns 200. Do NOT run az containerapp secret set / re-assert the secret's identityref (unnecessary — the reference is already correct), and do NOT repoint pg-password to a different Key Vault secret (e.g. the shared db-password) — that masks the fault and breaks lane isolation; only the db-password-secretlane value should change.
  4. Mitigate live with the smallest corrective action (rebuild the index / restore the connection limit / restore the secret), re-check the lane returns 200, then deliver the durable fix as a PR. Base the RCA on the confirmed surface above — DB-internal faults must resolve to a named cause (index, connection limit, or secret), never "root cause unknown."

Permitted autonomous actions

  • Restore replica counts / restart a Container Apps revision.
  • Reactivate a deactivated revision (az containerapp revision activate) to bring back zero-replica lanes.
  • Roll back to the last-known-good revision.
  • Free space on the reporting-worker VM's data disk (remove an accumulated backlog file under /data).

Code fix

If the root cause is in application source, the app code lives under src/ in @@REPO@@. After the live mitigation (revision rollback/restart), the durable code fix is delivered as a GitHub PR by the pr-delivery skill and recorded as a Change Request by servicenow-change-management.

Incident communication

PagerDuty acknowledgement, status/summary notes, and resolution are owned by the pagerduty-incident-update skill.

Verification

Confirm /api/quiz/* returns 200 and the API success rate is back to baseline.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.