confirmation-final-qa
Skill14 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create confirmation summary and final quality checks.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- rubric-scoringSkill
- required-fields-progressSkill
- category-subcategory-resolverSkill
- html-report-generationSkill
- dataverse-mcp-saveSkill
- file-usecase-extractionSkill
- usecase-strengthening-gapsSkill
- prorated-refund-calculatorSkill
- points-reconciliationSkill
- slip-pdf-generatorSkill
- membership-card-pngSkill
- legal-compliance-reviewSkill
- internal-consistency-reviewSkill
- generating-podcast-scriptSkill
- spreadsheet-data-analysis-reportingSkill
- polished-report-builderSkill
- newsletter-style-email-composerSkill
- loading-dock-selectorSkill
- dock-assignment-pass-pdfSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create the user-facing confirmation summary and block unsafe or incomplete submission.
- Distinctive: line 12
Use after scoring is complete and before any Dataverse write.
- Distinctive: line 46
Ask: Ready to record the findings?
- Distinctive: line 52
If Edit, ask only which fields to change and re-confirm after edits.
- Distinctive: line 53
If Cancel, end politely without saving.
- Distinctive: line 54
If Submit, validate before save.
- Distinctive: line 55
Do not expose table names, columns, schemas, GUIDs, or duplicate-check logic.
- Distinctive: line 56
Do not reveal CAD Intake Quality.
- Distinctive: line 57
Do not expose internal rubric codes or factor IDs such as I1, I2, I5, C1, or similar.
- Distinctive: line 58
Use plain factor names only in confirmation tables.
- Distinctive: line 59
Use "Use case area" and "Specific use case type" as the user-facing labels for category and subcategory.
- Distinctive: line 60
If this is a provisional assessment, clearly label it as provisional and show the unresolved gaps before asking for Submit.
- Distinctive: line 61
Use compact tables for confirmation summaries where helpful.
- Distinctive: line 82
All missing values are clearly marked NOT ENOUGH INFO.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
name: confirmation-final-qa description: Create confirmation summary and final quality checks. ---# Confirmation and Final QA Skill
Purpose
Create the user-facing confirmation summary and block unsafe or incomplete submission.
When to use
Use after scoring is complete and before any Dataverse write.
Inputs
- Working object. - Assessment output. - User intent: Submit, Edit, Cancel, or unknown.
Confirmation summary must include
- Customer Name - Idea Title - Use Case Category - Use Case Subcategory - Summary - Problem / Need - Proposed Solution - Expected Benefits - Target Audience - Personas Impacted - Potential Risks - Sample Prompts, Agent Questions, and Example Answers - Impact Assessment table: Factor | Score | Rationale - Complexity Assessment table: Factor | Score | Rationale - Reach Score - Agentic Fit - Impact Average - Complexity Average - Weak spots / validation notes - Missing or NOT ENOUGH INFO areas - Recommended questions to complete the assessment
Rules
- Ask: Ready to record the findings? - Suggested replies: 1. Submit 2. Edit 3. Cancel - Tell the user they can reply with the number or the option text. - If Edit, ask only which fields to change and re-confirm after edits. - If Cancel, end politely without saving. - If Submit, validate before save. - Do not expose table names, columns, schemas, GUIDs, or duplicate-check logic. - Do not reveal CAD Intake Quality. - Do not expose internal rubric codes or factor IDs such as I1, I2, I5, C1, or similar. - Use plain factor names only in confirmation tables. - Use "Use case area" and "Specific use case type" as the user-facing labels for category and subcategory. - If this is a provisional assessment, clearly label it as provisional and show the unresolved gaps before asking for Submit. - Use compact tables for confirmation summaries where helpful. - Required field confirmation can use columns: Field | Value | Confidence / note. - Include sample prompts, agent questions, and example answers in the confirmation summary. If missing in provisional mode, show it as a gap and recommended follow-up. - Impact and Complexity assessments must use columns: Factor | Score | Rationale. - Provisional gaps can use columns: Area | Status | What is missing | Recommended follow-up.
Blocking validation
Block submission if:
- Any required field is missing. - Category/subcategory is NOT ENOUGH INFO. - Any factor is NOT ENOUGH INFO in Guided Completion or Full Assessment mode. - Reach Score is missing or outside the allowed range. - Averages are missing or inconsistent. - User did not explicitly choose Submit. - Dataverse save requirements cannot represent NOT ENOUGH INFO values in provisional mode.
Allow submission in Provisional Assessment mode only if:
- The user explicitly chose Run provisional assessment. - All missing values are clearly marked NOT ENOUGH INFO. - The report will include the missing evidence summary and recommended questions. - Dataverse can store unresolved fields without invalid placeholder scores.
Output contract
{
"confirmationSummary": "",
"readyToSubmit": false,
"blockingIssues": [],
"editPrompt": "",
"cancelMessage": ""
}Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

