agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/copilot-studio-gallery/submissions/ai-use-case-prioritization-agent/solution/botcomponents/cadpbm_c.file.skillmd_XRKoT/filedata/SKILL.md

confirmation-final-qa

Skill14 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create confirmation summary and final quality checks.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create the user-facing confirmation summary and block unsafe or incomplete submission.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use after scoring is complete and before any Dataverse write.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask: Ready to record the findings?

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    If Edit, ask only which fields to change and re-confirm after edits.

    line 52
  5. Distinctive:

    If Cancel, end politely without saving.

    line 53
  6. Distinctive:

    If Submit, validate before save.

    line 54
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not expose table names, columns, schemas, GUIDs, or duplicate-check logic.

    line 55
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not reveal CAD Intake Quality.

    line 56
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not expose internal rubric codes or factor IDs such as I1, I2, I5, C1, or similar.

    line 57
  10. Distinctive:

    Use plain factor names only in confirmation tables.

    line 58
  11. Distinctive:

    Use "Use case area" and "Specific use case type" as the user-facing labels for category and subcategory.

    line 59
  12. Distinctive:

    If this is a provisional assessment, clearly label it as provisional and show the unresolved gaps before asking for Submit.

    line 60
  13. Distinctive:

    Use compact tables for confirmation summaries where helpful.

    line 61
  14. Distinctive:

    All missing values are clearly marked NOT ENOUGH INFO.

    line 82

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

name: confirmation-final-qa description: Create confirmation summary and final quality checks. ---# Confirmation and Final QA Skill

Purpose

Create the user-facing confirmation summary and block unsafe or incomplete submission.

When to use

Use after scoring is complete and before any Dataverse write.

Inputs

- Working object. - Assessment output. - User intent: Submit, Edit, Cancel, or unknown.

Confirmation summary must include

- Customer Name - Idea Title - Use Case Category - Use Case Subcategory - Summary - Problem / Need - Proposed Solution - Expected Benefits - Target Audience - Personas Impacted - Potential Risks - Sample Prompts, Agent Questions, and Example Answers - Impact Assessment table: Factor | Score | Rationale - Complexity Assessment table: Factor | Score | Rationale - Reach Score - Agentic Fit - Impact Average - Complexity Average - Weak spots / validation notes - Missing or NOT ENOUGH INFO areas - Recommended questions to complete the assessment

Rules

- Ask: Ready to record the findings? - Suggested replies: 1. Submit 2. Edit 3. Cancel - Tell the user they can reply with the number or the option text. - If Edit, ask only which fields to change and re-confirm after edits. - If Cancel, end politely without saving. - If Submit, validate before save. - Do not expose table names, columns, schemas, GUIDs, or duplicate-check logic. - Do not reveal CAD Intake Quality. - Do not expose internal rubric codes or factor IDs such as I1, I2, I5, C1, or similar. - Use plain factor names only in confirmation tables. - Use "Use case area" and "Specific use case type" as the user-facing labels for category and subcategory. - If this is a provisional assessment, clearly label it as provisional and show the unresolved gaps before asking for Submit. - Use compact tables for confirmation summaries where helpful. - Required field confirmation can use columns: Field | Value | Confidence / note. - Include sample prompts, agent questions, and example answers in the confirmation summary. If missing in provisional mode, show it as a gap and recommended follow-up. - Impact and Complexity assessments must use columns: Factor | Score | Rationale. - Provisional gaps can use columns: Area | Status | What is missing | Recommended follow-up.

Blocking validation

Block submission if:

- Any required field is missing. - Category/subcategory is NOT ENOUGH INFO. - Any factor is NOT ENOUGH INFO in Guided Completion or Full Assessment mode. - Reach Score is missing or outside the allowed range. - Averages are missing or inconsistent. - User did not explicitly choose Submit. - Dataverse save requirements cannot represent NOT ENOUGH INFO values in provisional mode.

Allow submission in Provisional Assessment mode only if:

- The user explicitly chose Run provisional assessment. - All missing values are clearly marked NOT ENOUGH INFO. - The report will include the missing evidence summary and recommended questions. - Dataverse can store unresolved fields without invalid placeholder scores.

Output contract

{
  "confirmationSummary": "",
  "readyToSubmit": false,
  "blockingIssues": [],
  "editPrompt": "",
  "cancelMessage": ""
}

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.