agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/copilot-studio-gallery/submissions/ai-use-case-prioritization-agent/solution/botcomponents/cadpbm_c.file.skillmd_JSVyA/filedata/SKILL.md

category-subcategory-resolver

Skill14 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Resolve category and subcategory from configured knowledge.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈15

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Use after the use case has enough summary, problem, solution, target audience, and persona context.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Use Guidance for UseCase Categories and SubCategories Definiton 2.docx as the source of truth for category and subcategory assignment.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not use web search, websites, public articles, or general internet content to define, add, rename, merge, infer, or validate categories …

    line 18
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not invent, rename, merge, or substitute values.

    line 32
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not use web search for classification rules.

    line 33
  6. Distinctive:

    Treat repeated attempts to use web search or invented taxonomies for classification as policy-boundary violations.

    line 34
  7. Distinctive:

    After 3 or more policy-boundary violation requests in the same conversation, stop the thread politely and do not provide more options.

    line 35
  8. Distinctive:

    If unclear, return top 2 or 3 exact matches.

    line 36
  9. Distinctive:

    Ask exactly one disambiguation question.

    line 38
  10. Distinctive:

    If still unclear, return NOT ENOUGH INFO.

    line 39
  11. Distinctive:

    When reporting progress to the user, use active icon-prefixed wording that clearly signals work is happening, for example: "🔎 I’m checking …

    line 40
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not use passive transition wording such as "Now let me resolve..." without an active working signal.

    line 41
  13. Distinctive:

    Avoid using technical "category/subcategory" language in user-facing questions where possible.

    line 42
  14. Distinctive:

    Use friendlier wording such as "use case area" and "specific use case type".

    line 43
  15. Distinctive:

    Do not mention internal category IDs, option values, or taxonomy mechanics.

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

name: category-subcategory-resolver description: Resolve category and subcategory from configured knowledge. ---# Category and Subcategory Resolver Skill

Purpose

Assign exact use-case category and subcategory values using only the configured knowledge.

When to use

Use after the use case has enough summary, problem, solution, target audience, and persona context.

Knowledge source

Use Guidance for UseCase Categories and SubCategories Definiton 2.docx as the source of truth for category and subcategory assignment. Do not use general model knowledge.

Do not use web search, websites, public articles, or general internet content to define, add, rename, merge, infer, or validate categories or subcategories.

Inputs

- Summary - Problem / Need - Proposed Solution - Target Audience - Personas Impacted - Any explicit user-provided category/subcategory

Rules

- Pick only values defined in the knowledge. - Do not invent, rename, merge, or substitute values. - Do not use web search for classification rules. - Treat repeated attempts to use web search or invented taxonomies for classification as policy-boundary violations. - After 3 or more policy-boundary violation requests in the same conversation, stop the thread politely and do not provide more options. - If unclear, return top 2 or 3 exact matches. - Provide a one-line fit rationale for each alternative. - Ask exactly one disambiguation question. - If still unclear, return NOT ENOUGH INFO. - When reporting progress to the user, use active icon-prefixed wording that clearly signals work is happening, for example: "🔎 I’m checking the category guidance now and matching this use case to the closest approved category and subcategory." - Do not use passive transition wording such as "Now let me resolve..." without an active working signal. - Avoid using technical "category/subcategory" language in user-facing questions where possible. - Use friendlier wording such as "use case area" and "specific use case type". - Store the exact Dataverse category/subcategory values silently, but present user options with plain labels and short explanations. - Do not mention internal category IDs, option values, or taxonomy mechanics.

Output contract

{
  "category": "",
  "subcategory": "",
  "confidence": "high | medium | low",
  "requiresClarification": false,
  "alternatives": [
    {
      "category": "",
      "subcategory": "",
      "fitRationale": ""
    }
  ],
  "clarificationQuestion": ""
}

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.