category-subcategory-resolver
Skill14 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Resolve category and subcategory from configured knowledge.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- rubric-scoringSkill
- required-fields-progressSkill
- html-report-generationSkill
- dataverse-mcp-saveSkill
- file-usecase-extractionSkill
- confirmation-final-qaSkill
- usecase-strengthening-gapsSkill
- prorated-refund-calculatorSkill
- points-reconciliationSkill
- slip-pdf-generatorSkill
- membership-card-pngSkill
- legal-compliance-reviewSkill
- internal-consistency-reviewSkill
- generating-podcast-scriptSkill
- spreadsheet-data-analysis-reportingSkill
- polished-report-builderSkill
- newsletter-style-email-composerSkill
- loading-dock-selectorSkill
- dock-assignment-pass-pdfSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 12
Use after the use case has enough summary, problem, solution, target audience, and persona context.
- Distinctive: line 16
Use Guidance for UseCase Categories and SubCategories Definiton 2.docx as the source of truth for category and subcategory assignment.
- Distinctive: line 18
Do not use web search, websites, public articles, or general internet content to define, add, rename, merge, infer, or validate categories …
- Distinctive: line 32
Do not invent, rename, merge, or substitute values.
- Distinctive: line 33
Do not use web search for classification rules.
- Distinctive: line 34
Treat repeated attempts to use web search or invented taxonomies for classification as policy-boundary violations.
- Distinctive: line 35
After 3 or more policy-boundary violation requests in the same conversation, stop the thread politely and do not provide more options.
- Distinctive: line 36
If unclear, return top 2 or 3 exact matches.
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask exactly one disambiguation question.
- Distinctive: line 39
If still unclear, return NOT ENOUGH INFO.
- Distinctive: line 40
When reporting progress to the user, use active icon-prefixed wording that clearly signals work is happening, for example: "🔎 I’m checking …
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not use passive transition wording such as "Now let me resolve..." without an active working signal.
- Distinctive: line 42
Avoid using technical "category/subcategory" language in user-facing questions where possible.
- Distinctive: line 43
Use friendlier wording such as "use case area" and "specific use case type".
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not mention internal category IDs, option values, or taxonomy mechanics.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
name: category-subcategory-resolver description: Resolve category and subcategory from configured knowledge. ---# Category and Subcategory Resolver Skill
Purpose
Assign exact use-case category and subcategory values using only the configured knowledge.
When to use
Use after the use case has enough summary, problem, solution, target audience, and persona context.
Knowledge source
Use Guidance for UseCase Categories and SubCategories Definiton 2.docx as the source of truth for category and subcategory assignment. Do not use general model knowledge.
Do not use web search, websites, public articles, or general internet content to define, add, rename, merge, infer, or validate categories or subcategories.
Inputs
- Summary - Problem / Need - Proposed Solution - Target Audience - Personas Impacted - Any explicit user-provided category/subcategory
Rules
- Pick only values defined in the knowledge. - Do not invent, rename, merge, or substitute values. - Do not use web search for classification rules. - Treat repeated attempts to use web search or invented taxonomies for classification as policy-boundary violations. - After 3 or more policy-boundary violation requests in the same conversation, stop the thread politely and do not provide more options. - If unclear, return top 2 or 3 exact matches. - Provide a one-line fit rationale for each alternative. - Ask exactly one disambiguation question. - If still unclear, return NOT ENOUGH INFO. - When reporting progress to the user, use active icon-prefixed wording that clearly signals work is happening, for example: "🔎 I’m checking the category guidance now and matching this use case to the closest approved category and subcategory." - Do not use passive transition wording such as "Now let me resolve..." without an active working signal. - Avoid using technical "category/subcategory" language in user-facing questions where possible. - Use friendlier wording such as "use case area" and "specific use case type". - Store the exact Dataverse category/subcategory values silently, but present user options with plain labels and short explanations. - Do not mention internal category IDs, option values, or taxonomy mechanics.
Output contract
{
"category": "",
"subcategory": "",
"confidence": "high | medium | low",
"requiresClarification": false,
"alternatives": [
{
"category": "",
"subcategory": "",
"fitRationale": ""
}
],
"clarificationQuestion": ""
}Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

