meeting-prep
Skill101 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prepares a seller for one upcoming customer conversation such as what to learn, say, prove, and ask, with an evidence-backed next move and a private editable brief. Use when asked to "prep my customer call", "brief me before my sales meeting", "prepare for this buyer demo", "plan my renewal conversation", or "build talking points for this opportunity meeting". Do NOT use for past-meeting recaps, broad account plans, pipeline audits, seller coaching, standalone pitch decks, or automatic outreach.
53 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sammollaei/law-firm-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ShawhinT/non-coding-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sehgalmayank001/virtual-cortextheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- ARCASSystems/FounderOStheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- chacosoldier/compabobtheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- guerrilla2799/sdr-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use email-digest, meeting-followup and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
QuixiAISkillemail-digest
Digest and ingest emails into memory, surfacing important threads and action items
Also in 3 projects that use this
yakatotechSkillmeeting-followup
Create meeting minutes and follow-up email from meeting notes in one workflow. Execute all post-meeting tasks at once
Also in 3 projects that use this
vivy-yiSkillsocial-listening
Use when needing to understand audience needs, monitor brand mentions, track competitor activities, discover trends, or gather market intelligence from Xiaohongshu conversations
Also in 3 projects that use this
refly-aiSkillzoom
Integrate with Zoom for video meetings. Use when you need to: (1) schedule Zoom meetings, (2) create instant meetings, or (3) manage meeting details and invitations programmatically.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vijpatel7Skillcold-outreach
Write highly effective cold emails and LinkedIn messages to recruiters, hiring managers, founders, and engineers at target companies. Based on Ben Lang's proven cold outreach framework (Next Play). Use when the user wants to: (1) write a cold email to someone at a company they want to work for, (2) craft LinkedIn messages or InMail to recruiters or hiring managers, (3) reach out about unadvertised positions, (4) follow up on outreach or applications, (5) network with founders or executives for job opportunities, (6) prepare an outreach campaign to multiple companies. Triggers on: cold email, outreach, reach out to, contact recruiter, email founder, write to hiring manager, job email, networking email, LinkedIn message, InMail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
QuixiAISkillweekly-review
Review the past week across goals, tasks, calendar, journal, and commitments, then propose the next week
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from QuixiAI
Other versions53 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 53
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- gnekt/My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew★ 3.9ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
- QuixiAI/agi-memory★ 623same name
- QuixiAI/Hexis★ 623same name
- davekilleen/Dex★ 509same name
- glebis/claude-skills★ 410same name
- sonichi/sutando★ 396same name
- explorium-ai/gtm-skills★ 346same name
- mgonto/executive-assistant-skills★ 118same name
43 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository294 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- accessibility-passSkill
- accounting-root-skillSkill
- budget-and-forecastSkill
- financial-presentationsSkill
- financial-statementsSkill
- journal-entrySkill
- reconciliationSkill
- tax-preparationSkill
- acroform-writerSkill
- action-items-todoSkill
- agent-evaluation-designerSkill
- agent-harness-explorerSkill
- agent-performance-triageSkill
- agent-rai-impact-assessmentSkill
- agent-red-teamSkill
- ai-demo-assistantSkill
- ai-first-process-redesignSkill
- ai-usecase-assessmentSkill
- anonymised-case-study-writerSkill
- answer-researchSkill
- b2b-outreach-suiteSkill
- blog-content-auditorSkill
- blog-post-structure-passSkill
- booth-loop-videoSkill
- brand-template-enforcerSkill
- brand-voice-passSkill
- breathing-roomSkill
- browser-uat-analystSkill
- business-case-composerSkill
- business-osSkill
- call-for-speakers-digestSkill
- campaign-deck-builderSkill
- cim-teardownSkill
- company-profile-packSkill
- comps-analysisSkill
- coverage-meeting-prep-debriefSkill
- dd-checklistSkill
- document-diligenceSkill
- earnings-noteSkill
- ic-memoSkill
- merger-modelSkill
- pitch-deck-skeletonSkill
- case-preparation-briefSkill
- case-triageSkill
- chart-builderSkill
- classic-text-adventureSkill
- coding-rationaleSkill
- document-deriveSkill
- handoff-draftSkill
- note-contextSkill
- quality-gap-checkSkill
- clipchamp-videoSkill
- clt-hr-assistantSkill
- commenting-contentSkill
- competitive-battlecard-builderSkill
- competitive-strategySkill
- conditional-chat-reminderSkill
- conference-session-abstract-packSkill
- content-quality-auditorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.
20
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Start this procedure when the user requests preparation for an upcoming customer or sales interaction, including a general request such as …
- Distinctive: line 20
Before a substantive brief, establish the intended interaction, its objective or agenda, and at least one relevant meeting-specific fact.
- Distinctive: line 22
If timing or participants are unknown, produce a bounded topic-focused brief and mark those sections unknown.
- Distinctive: line 62
Use organization-supplied qualification, messaging, approval, and risk criteria when applicable.
- Distinctive: line 71
Use the same section headings and order in both.
- Distinctive: line 77
Do not include detailed research, lengthy analysis, or full talking points in chat.
- Distinctive: line 83
Use clear headings and a contents list or section navigation.
- Distinctive: line 87
Keep internal strategy separate from any customer-ready language embedded in the artifact.
- Distinctive: line 92
Use these sections in both chat and the artifact.
- Distinctive: line 122
Word (.docx): Default for an editable seller reference or discussion guide.
- Distinctive: line 125
Markdown (.md): When requested or Office is unavailable or fails.
- Distinctive: line 127
Use authorized, format-specific workflows.
- Distinctive: line 131
Use supplied materials, relevant internal sources, and public web searches.
- Distinctive: line 136
Do not infer buying intent from public developments or decision authority from a job title.
- Distinctive: line 141
Verify the save before reporting success and provide the actual link or location.
- Distinctive: line 150
Before a write, verify the target and current affected state.
- Distinctive: line 157
Do not manufacture a meeting, participant, customer position, outcome, or commitment when the evidence needed to establish it is absent.
- Very specific: line 160
Not for recording the outcomes of a completed meeting.
- Distinctive: line 161
Not for planning engagement phases across an account over a longer horizon.
- Distinctive: line 162
Not for a seller's work review or coaching agenda.
- Distinctive: line 163
Not for a broad question-led investigation unrelated to preparation for one interaction.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Meeting Prep for upcoming customer conversations
Domain: Sales.
Purpose
Prepare the seller a concise sales meeting brief for one upcoming customer interaction: what matters going in, who is expected, what remains owed or unresolved, which questions to ask, and what outcome to seek without presenting a planned conversation as an agreement.
For full preparation, proactively create meeting materials tailored to the upcoming conversation. Follow the Output section for artifact selection and the Research rules for gathering context. Include account or competitive research only when useful for that call and provide clear value to the seller.
Applicability
Start this procedure when the user requests preparation for an upcoming customer or sales interaction, including a general request such as "prepare me for a meeting" whose target is not yet specified. Do not guess a meeting.
Before a substantive brief, establish the intended interaction, its objective or agenda, and at least one relevant meeting-specific fact. If the interaction or objective cannot be established, return only focused preparation questions.
If timing or participants are unknown, produce a bounded topic-focused brief and mark those sections unknown. An objective or agenda can frame proposed questions and desired outcomes; it does not establish customer history.
Potential Data Sources
These are particularly important for this workflow; use your best judgment to use relevant material already supplied or available through applicable tools or sources you can access. These are options, not a mandatory checklist. If needed information is missing, ask the user to provide the input or context needed.
- Calendar for meeting identity, invite context, agenda, timing, and attendees.
- Meeting Transcripts for prior decisions, objections, commitments, and continuity.
- Email for prior meeting notes, recent questions, and customer-facing context.
- Internal Messaging for internal strategy, blockers, owners, and dependencies.
- Knowledge & Files for prior meeting notes, strategy documents, and assets.
- Record Snapshots & Exports for account, opportunity, renewal, and contact context.
- Sales Intelligence for additional context only when it materially improves preparation.
- Public web sources for the customer's account, company, and industry context, if not available through internal sources.
Usage situations
- "Prepare me for a meeting."
- "Brief me before my next customer call."
- "Prep me for this customer meeting using the agenda and messages below."
- "What should I know and ask before my call with this account?"
- "Which prior commitments and objections should we address in the next discussion?"
- "Build talking points and a desired outcome for this opportunity meeting."
Procedure
- Establish the interaction, customer or deal scope, objective, intended audience, meeting date/time and duration when known, and evidence cut-off. Distinguish a stated objective from a proposed one; do not infer a scheduled event from an intention to meet.
- Assemble only context that can affect this interaction: customer priorities, relevant deal state, decision process, solution or commercial constraints, recent substantive conversation, and unresolved questions.
- Identify known and expected participants, their evidenced roles and interests, and any decision coverage gap. Keep confirmed participation, invited or expected participation, and suggested participants separate. Record unknown authority rather than inferring it from a title or copied message.
- Reconcile relevant dated communications into a short chronology, deduplicating the same interaction across sources. Separate customer statements, seller reports, administrative updates, and interpretations; preserve contradictions and source dates.
- Build a commitment check: action, party, source, requested date, proposed date, accepted date when evidenced, current status, and dependency. Distinguish an accepted promise, an attempted action, and a verified outcome. If completion is unknown, make it a question to check, not a claim that the action failed or remains undone.
- Prioritize the discussion by the objective, material customer need, timing, dependencies, and supplied organization priorities. Include a service, delivery, competitive, or trust issue only when evidence connects it to this conversation. Do not include unrelated issue history or infer exposure from a shared account alone.
- Propose an agenda that moves from shared context to unresolved decisions and next-step agreement. For each material topic, provide the evidence-backed talking point, an open question, why it matters, and the desired outcome. Offer time allocations only when meeting duration is known and label them proposals.
- Identify objections or sensitivities to prepare for, claims needing validation, and questions whose answer would change the approach. Separate an evidenced objection from a possible objection; do not script unsupported assurances.
- Deliver the brief, highlighting the few issues that most change how to approach the meeting. Keep internal hypotheses and sensitive context separate from any requested customer-shareable agenda or draft.
- Include account or competitive research only when it helps with this call's questions, positioning, proof, or decisions.
Judgment
- An invitation or attendee list is evidence of planned participation, not attendance, decision authority, customer intent, or acceptance of the proposed agenda.
- A topic discussed is not a decision; a requested or proposed date is not an accepted commitment; an accepted commitment is not proof of completion or a secured deal outcome.
- Substantive customer evidence outweighs administrative activity for interpreting needs. A recent informal update does not automatically displace an authoritative agreement. Retain conflicting sources unless applicable evidence or a supplied policy resolves them.
- Missing, inaccessible, stale, conflicting, and verified negative evidence are distinct. No returned communication does not prove disengagement or the absence of commitments. State which sources and periods were actually examined.
- Use organization-supplied qualification, messaging, approval, and risk criteria when applicable. Without them, explain qualitative priorities and validation needs; do not invent a methodology, score, threshold, probability, or customer promise.
- Preserve dates, time zones, units, currency, and billing periods when they affect the discussion. Do not combine incompatible commercial amounts or invent prices, conversion rates, deadlines, or a meeting time.
Output
Deliver both a concise chat summary and one saved primary editable artifact, following the sections below. The artifact must contain the complete internal meeting-preparation brief, not just talking points.
Use the same section headings and order in both. The chat summarizes the most important takeaways; the artifact contains the supporting detail. Do not create additional artifacts unless the user requests them.
Chat summary
Aim for maximum 100 words overall, using one short takeaway per section. Prioritize the meeting objective, the recommended approach, the biggest risk, and the next action.
Do not include detailed research, lengthy analysis, or full talking points in chat. Link to the saved artifact and identify any sections that deserve particular attention.
Full preparation artifact
Include all preparation in one artifact, organized so the seller can choose where to spend more time.
- Use clear headings and a contents list or section navigation.
- Begin each substantive section with a brief takeaway, followed by supporting detail.
- Expand where useful; do not apply the chat's brevity limits to the artifact.
- Include actionable preparation rather than exhaustive background.
- Keep internal strategy separate from any customer-ready language embedded in the artifact.
- Label the artifact as internal seller preparation.
Shared output structure
Use these sections in both chat and the artifact. For the Appendix, chat only needs a short pointer to the available research.
- Meeting goal Explain why the meeting matters, the buyer's priority, and the outcome the seller should seek. Distinguish confirmed priorities from hypotheses and desired outcomes from agreements.
- Relevant context Cover the account, participants, opportunity, prior conversations, outstanding commitments, and seller readiness. Highlight research findings that change the meeting approach; place detailed supporting research in the Appendix.
- Conversation plan Provide the proposed agenda, opening, discovery questions, tailored value proposition, proof or demo points, and objections to prepare for. Include a pitch when useful—not automatically. Suggest timing only when meeting duration is known.
- Risks and open questions Identify missing information, assumptions, conflicting evidence, and sensitivities. Explain how each material gap could affect the conversation and what would resolve it.
- Recommended next actions Specify what the seller should prepare before the meeting, the buyer ask to make during it, and a fallback if the preferred outcome is premature. Label suggested owners and timing as proposals unless already agreed.
- Prepared materials In chat, link to the single full-preparation artifact. In the artifact, identify embedded materials and link to useful existing assets. Include newly prepared talking points, pitch outlines, demo guidance, or working matrices within this artifact—not as separate files.
- Appendix
Include only research useful for this call; omit either or both sections when they do not bring clear value to the seller for meeting preparation.
- Account research: Relevant business priorities, developments, stakeholder context, and account findings, with their implications for the meeting.
- Competitive analysis: Identify the potential competitor to the seller, research competitor information that will help seller prepare for customer conversations such as objection handling and product differentiation.
Artifact selection
Choose one format for the complete meeting preparation, respecting the user's requested format:
- Word (.docx): Default for an editable seller reference or discussion guide.
- PowerPoint (.pptx): For a pitch or demo rehearsal; retain detailed preparation without making internal strategy customer-facing.
- Excel (.xlsx): For requirements, evaluation, stakeholder or commitment matrix-led preparation; retain the narrative sections.
- Markdown (.md): When requested or Office is unavailable or fails; retain complete preparation and disclose limitations, using explicitly unsaved chat content if no authorized save works.
Use authorized, format-specific workflows. Keep content concise and styling simple. Plan changes together and apply them in as few supported batches as practical. Update authorized existing artifacts without creating duplicates or changing unrelated content. Follow Delivery and control for saving and reporting.
Research and competitive-analysis rules
- Use supplied materials, relevant internal sources, and public web searches.
- Research proactively when missing, stale, or conflicting information could change the questions, message, proof, or recommended ask.
- Include account research to help prepare for this customer conversation—not as a generic company profile.
- Include competitive analysis when a competitor is named, credible evidence indicates alternatives, or competitive positioning materially affects the meeting.
- Compare alternatives against the buyer's relevant criteria. Cover supported differentiators, strengths and tradeoffs, potential objections, suggested responses, and questions to validate.
- Do not infer buying intent from public developments or decision authority from a job title. Do not invent competitor weaknesses or superiority claims.
- Cite sources and dates, distinguish facts from hypotheses, and mark unresolved gaps. Never include confidential information in public research queries.
Delivery and control
Verify the save before reporting success and provide the actual link or location. If saving fails, disclose it and provide clearly labeled unsaved preparation in chat.
Guardrails
Preparation and drafting do not update records, record a completed meeting, schedule an interaction, assign work, send messages, or make commitments. Creating and saving the requested file artifact is permitted in authorized locations. Other consequential actions, including saves or draft creation in business records, sharing, sending, and scheduling, require separate, specific approval of the exact content, target, recipients, and timing as applicable. Before a write, verify the target and current affected state; materially changed content or state for an approval-gated action requires renewed approval. Recheck sharing restrictions and required contact permission before outreach; operator approval does not replace recipient consent or internal authority. Verify each actual effect before reporting completion. Keep proposed, approved, completed, and unconfirmed actions separate; reconcile an uncertain effect before any retry.
- Do not manufacture a meeting, participant, customer position, outcome, or commitment when the evidence needed to establish it is absent.
When NOT to Use
- Not for recording the outcomes of a completed meeting; use
post-meeting-follow-up. - Not for planning engagement phases across an account over a longer horizon; this brief prepares one interaction.
- Not for a seller's work review or coaching agenda.
- Not for a broad question-led investigation unrelated to preparation for one interaction.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

