conference-session-abstract-pack
Skill95 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when the user asks to create a conference session proposal, talk abstract, CFP submission, session title, description, learning objectives, takeaways, or speaker bio.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill to turn a topic, idea, draft, or talk outline into a submission-ready conference session pack.
- Distinctive: line 12
Do not invent speaker credentials, awards, employers, clients, or events.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use only the speaker bio information provided by the user or available in connected sources.
- Distinctive: line 15
If the event constraints are unknown, produce a flexible draft and list assumptions.
- Distinctive: line 31
Create several title options with different emphasis.
- Distinctive: line 34
Add a short audience-fit note and optional speaker notes.
- Distinctive: line 35
If constraints are missing, include a compact assumptions section.
- Distinctive: line 87
Avoid hype and empty trend language.
- Distinctive: line 88
Use confident but evidence-led phrasing.
- Distinctive: line 89
Keep the abstract readable aloud.
- Distinctive: line 105
No credentials or event details have been invented.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Conference Session Abstract Pack
Use this skill to turn a topic, idea, draft, or talk outline into a submission-ready conference session pack.
Evidence and positioning rules
- Do not invent speaker credentials, awards, employers, clients, or events.
- Use only the speaker bio information provided by the user or available in connected sources.
- Tailor the submission to the named event, audience, track, format, and session length when supplied.
- If the event constraints are unknown, produce a flexible draft and list assumptions.
Inputs to look for
- Topic or rough idea.
- Target event or community.
- Audience level: beginner, intermediate, advanced, executive, maker, developer, architect, practitioner.
- Format: session, workshop, lightning talk, panel, keynote, theatre session.
- Desired tone: practical, provocative, technical, strategic, hands-on, story-led.
- Speaker bio or credentials.
- Character or word limits.
Workflow
- Identify the central promise of the session.
- Define the audience and why they should attend.
- Create several title options with different emphasis.
- Draft the main abstract in a clear, credible style.
- Produce learning objectives or takeaways.
- Add a short audience-fit note and optional speaker notes.
- If constraints are missing, include a compact assumptions section.
Output format
# Conference session abstract pack
## Recommended title
[Title]
## Alternative titles
1. [Alternative]
2. [Alternative]
3. [Alternative]
## Abstract
[Submission-ready abstract]
## Audience
[Who this is for]
## Key takeaways
- [Takeaway]
- [Takeaway]
- [Takeaway]
## Why this session matters now
[Short positioning paragraph]
## Speaker bio
[Bio if source material is available, otherwise: "Speaker bio not supplied."]
## Optional short version
[Short abstract for tighter submission forms]
## Assumptions or gaps
- [Only include if needed]Writing guidance
- Make the title specific, not generic.
- Show what the audience will be able to do or understand afterwards.
- Avoid hype and empty trend language.
- Use confident but evidence-led phrasing.
- Keep the abstract readable aloud.
References
This skill includes supporting reference material. Read the relevant reference file when the task needs additional structure, rubric detail, examples, or checklist support.
references/cfp-quality-checklist.md- use this when additional structure, examples, or checks are useful for the task.
Quality checklist
Before responding, check:
- The title is memorable and relevant.
- The abstract has a clear promise.
- The takeaways are practical and distinct.
- No credentials or event details have been invented.
- The pack can be pasted into a CFP form with minimal editing.
In this repository199 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- accessibility-passSkill
- acroform-writerSkill
- action-items-todoSkill
- agent-evaluation-designerSkill
- agent-harness-explorerSkill
- agent-performance-triageSkill
- agent-red-teamSkill
- ai-demo-assistantSkill
- ai-first-process-redesignSkill
- ai-usecase-assessmentSkill
- anonymised-case-study-writerSkill
- evidence-gatherSkill
- gap-checkSkill
- readiness-packSkill
- scope-mapSkill
- b2b-outreach-suiteSkill
- blog-content-auditorSkill
- blog-post-structure-passSkill
- booth-loop-videoSkill
- brand-template-enforcerSkill
- brand-voice-passSkill
- breathing-roomSkill
- browser-uat-analystSkill
- business-osSkill
- call-for-speakers-digestSkill
- campaign-deck-builderSkill
- chart-builderSkill
- classic-text-adventureSkill
- clipchamp-videoSkill
- clt-hr-assistantSkill
- commenting-contentSkill
- competitive-battlecard-builderSkill
- conditional-chat-reminderSkill
- contradiction-flagSkill
- insight-briefSkill
- provenance-checkSkill
- research-retrieveSkill
- trend-compareSkill
- content-quality-auditorSkill
- copilot-agent-advisorSkill
- copilot-studio-adaptive-card-builderSkill
- copilot-studio-agent-testSkill
- copilot-studio-harness-pickerSkill
- copilot-studio-knowledge-readinessSkill
- copilot-studio-mcp-readinessSkill
- copilot-studio-topic-blueprintSkill
- cowork-plugin-engineerSkill
- cowork-use-case-one-pagerSkill
- create-copilot-adoption-dashboardSkill
- context-assembleSkill
- handoff-packetSkill
- inquiry-intakeSkill
- knowledge-retrieveSkill
- resolution-draftSkill
- doc-format-converterSkill
- bom-impactSkill
- ecn-draftSkill
- ecr-ingestSkill
- standards-checkSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

