agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/Tandem/development/tandem/skills/module-designer/SKILL.md

module-designer

Skill8 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Refine responsibilities in the layered System technology stack.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this method when logical responsibilities materially influence technology boundaries.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use stable lowercase kebab-case IDs.

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Module Designer

Use this method when logical responsibilities materially influence technology boundaries. Omit it when the stack can be described directly by stack-designer.

Help stack-designer choose the smallest coherent layers and state what each layer owns. Do not turn implementation files, framework folders, or individual services into layers.

Contribute to exactly one stack:

systemStacks[0]
├─ title
└─ layers[]
   ├─ id
   ├─ name
   ├─ responsibility
   └─ technologies[]: { name, role }

Use stable lowercase kebab-case IDs. Preserve top-to-bottom dependency order. Do not emit connections, coordinates, styling, icons, or a separate module diagram.

Phrase layer names and responsibilities by the product job they perform. Avoid internal code organization terms unless a non-experienced reviewer needs that boundary to understand a consequential tradeoff.

Return consequential module-boundary Attention to stack-designer, attached to the affected System layer and tagged blocking or non-blocking.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.