module-designer
Skill8 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Refine responsibilities in the layered System technology stack.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- development/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- backbone-designerSkill
- contract-designerSkill
- control-flow-designerSkill
- deployment-designerSkill
- gui-designerSkill
- stack-designerSkill
- storage-contract-designerSkill
- use-case-designerSkill
- tandemSkill
- backbone-designerSkill
- contract-designerSkill
- control-flow-designerSkill
- deployment-designerSkill
- gui-designerSkill
- module-designerSkill
- stack-designerSkill
- storage-contract-designerSkill
- use-case-designerSkill
- brainstorm-whiteboardSkill
- tandemSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this method when logical responsibilities materially influence technology boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 27
Use stable lowercase kebab-case IDs.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Module Designer
Use this method when logical responsibilities materially influence technology boundaries. Omit it
when the stack can be described directly by stack-designer.
Help stack-designer choose the smallest coherent layers and state what each layer owns. Do not
turn implementation files, framework folders, or individual services into layers.
Contribute to exactly one stack:
systemStacks[0]
├─ title
└─ layers[]
├─ id
├─ name
├─ responsibility
└─ technologies[]: { name, role }Use stable lowercase kebab-case IDs. Preserve top-to-bottom dependency order. Do not emit connections, coordinates, styling, icons, or a separate module diagram.
Phrase layer names and responsibilities by the product job they perform. Avoid internal code organization terms unless a non-experienced reviewer needs that boundary to understand a consequential tradeoff.
Return consequential module-boundary Attention to stack-designer, attached to the
affected System layer and tagged blocking or non-blocking.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

