agentleFS
mia-pppmia-ppp/PMM-Skills/skills/competitor-profiling/SKILL.md

competitor-profiling

Skill2 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants competitor research, a named competitor profile or dossier, competitive landscape discovery, an alternative-universe comparison, or competitive signals/change investigation. Accept URLs, supplied research, and targeted verification requests. For external market/category conditions, see market-intelligence; for comparison pages, see competitor-alternatives; for battlecards, see sales-enablement; for closed-deal causes, see win-loss-intelligence.

38 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use popups, paywalls and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CesarjoquinSkill

    popups

    When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see cro. For general page conversion optimization, see cro.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • CesarjoquinSkill

    paywalls

    When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • coreyhaines31Skill

    marketing-council

    When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • coreyhaines31Skill

    marketing-loops

    When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'weekly ads check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'run my SEO,' 'SEO operator,' 'daily SEO agent,' 'run my outbound,' 'AI SDR,' 'reply triage,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • roerohanSkill

    emails

    When the user wants to create or optimize an email sequence, drip campaign, automated email flow, or lifecycle email program. Also use when the user mentions "email sequence," "drip campaign," "nurture sequence," "onboarding emails," "welcome sequence," "re-engagement emails," "email automation," "lifecycle emails," "trigger-based emails," "email funnel," "email workflow," "what emails should I send," "welcome series," or "email cadence." Use this for any multi-email automated flow. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For in-app onboarding, see onboarding.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • +7 more from Cesarjoquin

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 33 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read ../_shared/evidence-gaps.md and ../_shared/ssot-consumption.md.

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Read ../_shared/context-establishment.md when available.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Read that reference for domain checks and the return template on every run.

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask only for missing facts that materially change the work.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Read the selected section of references/modes.md.

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    Use only modes needed for the question.

    line 36
  7. Distinctive:

    Use existing evidence and the smallest useful verification.

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Keep these distinctions explicit:

    line 57
  9. Distinctive:

    Search overlap versus evidence of commercial competition.

    line 63
  10. Distinctive:

    Never infer absence from an omitted feature or inaccessible page.

    line 67
  11. Distinctive:

    Use only applicable subdirectories.

    line 87
  12. Distinctive:

    Never overwrite earlier raw captures.

    line 92
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not write into the skills repository during production runs.

    line 97
  14. Distinctive:

    Never write canonical files, decisions, manifests, or state.md.

    line 119
  15. Distinctive:

    Use Sourced / Assumed / Gap with kind, verification, confidence/rationale, limitations, approval status, and review trigger.

    line 129
  16. Distinctive:

    Use no em dashes. Keep sentences short and bullets led by outcomes.

    line 135

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 33 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Competitor Profiling

Establish sourced facts about alternatives, structure a comparable landscape, and verify changes against dated baselines. Separate facts, reported claims, interpretations, and implications. Research does not approve strategy.

Before starting

  • Resolve the active project/product scope. Keep other projects' evidence and approval references out of this return; IDs are project-scoped.
  • Read ../_shared/evidence-gaps.md and ../_shared/ssot-consumption.md.
  • Read ../_shared/context-establishment.md when available. It owns Phase 1 evidence, readiness, and handoff/return semantics. Otherwise use the compatible minimum in references/templates.md. Read that reference for domain checks and the return template on every run.
  • Load relevant manifest-mapped approved context. Record version, authority, health, and gaps. Bootstrap context stays provisional.
  • Preserve originating HND/GAP/SRC/FND IDs, exact question, completion criteria, scope, constraints, opposing evidence, and return destination.
  • Inventory profiles, raw captures, supplied dossiers, customer findings, and dated snapshots before collecting more. Mark inspection coverage and unavailable material.
  • Resolve job/problem or named entity, geography, period, intended use, and depth. Ask only for missing facts that materially change the work. Exploration requires useful scope, not approved personas or an accepted market.

Choose the smallest useful mode

Read the selected section of references/modes.md. Use only modes needed for the question.

ModeExact job and triggersOutput
Competitive landscapeIdentify and structure the relevant alternative universe. “Who competes for this job?” “Map our alternatives.”Inclusion rationale, alternative register, supported comparison, coverage/freshness view.
Entity profilingEstablish sourced facts about a named alternative. “Profile this competitor.” “Verify whether this feature exists.”Focused or full dossier with field-level provenance and verification.
Competitive signalsIdentify and verify changes against a dated baseline. “What changed since our last profile?” “Investigate this launch.”Event/delta register with verification, materiality, and affected references.

Landscape discovery may commission focused profiles before comparison. Signals refresh affected fields and comparisons without repeating full studies. Named-entity requests need not start with landscape discovery.

Research and evidence

Use existing evidence and the smallest useful verification. URLs are optional. Methods include supplied-material analysis, documentation, published commercial terms, release notes, original filings, permitted demos/trials, and customer findings. Scraping and SEO are optional methods, not prerequisites. Read references/tool-reference.md only when those tools fit the question. Missing tools never justify invented data.

Keep these distinctions explicit:

  • Competitor-authored claim versus documented behavior versus direct verification.
  • Customer-reported experience versus general product fact.
  • Unknown capability versus scoped evidence of absence in a tier/version.
  • Announcement versus available, beta, limited access, or withdrawn capability.
  • Observed change versus inference about intent, demand, or commercial impact.
  • Search overlap versus evidence of commercial competition.

Record lineage and counterevidence. Copies of one announcement are one signal. Ratings, traffic, and review counts do not verify revenue or customer totals. Never infer absence from an omitted feature or inaccessible page. Compare equivalent versions, tiers, currencies, billing periods, and regions. No universal source-count threshold establishes confidence or readiness.

Persistence and refresh

Preserve the existing project-relative competitor-profiles location when used:

competitor-profiles/
  raw/<alternative-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<capture-id>/
    scrapes/
    seo/
    reviews/
    supplied/
  <alternative-slug>.md
  _summary.md
  _signals.md

Use only applicable subdirectories. Existing date-only raw folders remain valid. A capture ID prevents overwriting same-day runs. Retain source IDs and precise paths on refresh. Capture collected raw evidence before synthesis when saving is part of the task. Reference supplied originals without rewriting them; respect access/use restrictions. If capture is unavailable, disclose the limitation. Never overwrite earlier raw captures. Preserve profile versions, change history, and supersession links. _summary.md is a derived comparison, not another authority. _signals.md is an optional noncanonical event view, not an installed monitor.

Save only in the user's project when requested or workflow-authorized. Do not write into the skills repository during production runs. Research or a cadence does not authorize outreach, account creation, spending, installed monitoring, or sending alerts.

Ownership and handoffs

NeedOwner and boundary
Market conditions, category conventions, opportunity hypothesesmarket-intelligence. Competitive gaps do not establish demand.
Customer experience themes and reusable languagecustomer-research. Reuse findings and attribute reported experience.
Closed-deal causes and buyer/seller disagreementwin-loss-intelligence. Competitor presence is not loss causality.
Objection libraryobjection-intelligence. Route evidence, not invented responses.
Where/whether to enter and company-specific sizingmarket-entry-brief. Landscape relevance does not select a market.
Who to target and buying groupicp-and-buyer-personas. Their targeting claims do not select our ICP.
Our positioning, differentiation, and category/framepositioning-strategy. Maps/whitespace are research, not strategic choices.
Messaging architecturemessaging-framework. Observed wording does not change our messages.
Pricing/packaging decisionspricing-strategy. Record terms without recommending our price.
GTM or competitive response decisionsgo-to-market-strategy and relevant decision owners. Surface review needs without committing actions.
Battlecards and comparison pagessales-enablement and competitor-alternatives. Consume sourced views and approved company claims.
Integrated context and goal-relative readinessproduct-marketing-context. Return findings without becoming an orchestrator.
Approved canon, drift verdicts, and persistencessot-context-loop. Explicit human approval is mandatory for canonical changes.

Never write canonical files, decisions, manifests, or state.md. Return to originating PMC or named requester using the packet in templates.md. Suggest competitive context for living/06-competitive.md and supporting evidence for living/07-evidence.md without duplicating claims. SSOT chooses destinations and gates. Verified external changes are not SSOT drift verdicts and never silently rewrite strategy or collateral.

Output rules

  • Open with Inputs and assumptions, selected mode, scope, and inspected coverage.
  • Use Sourced / Assumed / Gap with kind, verification, confidence/rationale, limitations, approval status, and review trigger.
  • Expose derivations and labeled inputs without adding a Derived evidence tag.
  • Preserve unknowns, opposing evidence, and completion-criteria assessment.
  • End with ranked Evidence gaps: top five in the body, all others in an appendix. Give owners and milestones, explicitly marking suggestions.
  • Use no em dashes. Keep sentences short and bullets led by outcomes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.