agentleFS
mfraunhofermfraunhofer/claude-skills/pitch/SKILL.md

pitch

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Lightweight pre-planning skill that turns a fuzzy idea into a structured Feature Pitch (pitch.md) before any deeper planning or PRD step runs. Asks 6 questions one at a time with adaptive multiple-choice anchors, then writes the pitch file. Use when the user says "/pitch", "I have an idea for", "let's pitch this", "new feature idea", "I want to build", or whenever a software idea needs to be shaped before a domain/spec review. NOT for full PRDs, abstract strategy, or ideas that already have a detailed spec.

14 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use launch and spec.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    launch

    Launch and automate VS Code Insiders with the Copilot Chat extension using @playwright/cli via Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when you need to interact with the VS Code UI, automate the chat panel, test the extension UI, or take screenshots. Triggers include 'automate VS Code', 'interact with chat', 'test the UI', 'take a screenshot', 'launch with debugging'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    spec

    Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before the first question:

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    Read CONTEXT.md in the current project (or CONTEXT-MAP.md if present): it supplies the actors for Q2 and the out-of-scope suggestions for …

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    Read docs/adr/ if present: it supplies no-go candidates for Q6.

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    If no project context is detectable: use the defaults (see references/defaults.md).

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    No multiple choice: free text.

    line 31
  6. Distinctive:

    If the answer is too abstract ("users are confused"): dig in with "Show me a concrete situation: who's doing what, and what goes wrong?"

    line 32
  7. Distinctive:

    If no CONTEXT.md: End user / Admin / Internal team / Multiple.

    line 37
  8. Distinctive:

    Always: "+ Other (free text)" as the last option.

    line 38
  9. Distinctive:

    No MC: free text, with a starter: "Imagine you're explaining it to someone at a whiteboard in 30 seconds."

    line 42
  10. Distinctive:

    If the answer is too precise (user stories, DB schema): stop and say "That's already PRD-level: save it for the planning step.

    line 43
  11. Distinctive:

    Undecided: not settled yet

    line 50
  12. Distinctive:

    Always include a free-text option.

    line 55
  13. Distinctive:

    If no ADRs: compliance notes (GDPR, etc.), hard technical limits.

    line 61
  14. Very specific:

    If docs/pitches/ doesn't exist: create it lazily.

    line 70
  15. Distinctive:

    If no project root is detectable: the current directory.

    line 71
  16. Distinctive:

    User already has a pitch.md: ask whether to update it or start a new version.

    line 94
  17. Distinctive:

    No CONTEXT.md present: use defaults for Q2 + Q5 (see references/defaults.md).

    line 96
  18. Very specific:

    User skips a question: ask once more. If still no input: leave the section empty and mark it in pitch.md as _Not answered: resolve during …

    line 98

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

What this skill does

Asks 6 questions: one at a time, with multiple-choice anchors drawn from the project context, and then writes a pitch.md. That file is the input for your next planning step (a domain/spec review, a PRD, or a companion skill like grill-with-docs if you use one).

Why not jump straight to planning? A planning/spec step can only challenge something once there's something to challenge. Without a pitch, the first half of the session goes to figuring out what should even be built. The pitch separates "what do we want" from "does it fit our domain model".


Flow

Step 1: Load context

Before the first question:

  • Read CONTEXT.md in the current project (or CONTEXT-MAP.md if present): it supplies the actors for Q2 and the out-of-scope suggestions for Q5.
  • Read docs/adr/ if present: it supplies no-go candidates for Q6.
  • If no project context is detectable: use the defaults (see references/defaults.md).

Step 2: Ask the 6 questions

Always: one question per message. Name a recommendation. Confirm before moving on.

Q1: The problem

"What's the concrete problem? Describe a situation, not a feature."

  • No multiple choice: free text.
  • If the answer is too abstract ("users are confused"): dig in with "Show me a concrete situation: who's doing what, and what goes wrong?"

Q2: Audience

"Who is this for, who hits this problem?"

  • Generate MC options from the actors in CONTEXT.md.
  • If no CONTEXT.md: End user / Admin / Internal team / Multiple.
  • Always: "+ Other (free text)" as the last option.

Q3: Rough solution

"What's your rough idea for the solution? 2–3 sentences, no wireframe."

  • No MC: free text, with a starter: "Imagine you're explaining it to someone at a whiteboard in 30 seconds."
  • If the answer is too precise (user stories, DB schema): stop and say "That's already PRD-level: save it for the planning step. Rougher, please."

Q4: Scope of the first version

"How built-out should the first version be?"

  • MC:
    • MVP: fastest version that solves the problem, technical debt knowingly accepted
    • Polished: production-ready, all edge cases
    • Undecided: not settled yet

Q5: Out of scope

"What's explicitly NOT part of this: things that might seem adjacent but aren't coming yet?"

  • MC suggestions from CONTEXT.md: things marked there as "out of scope" or "phase X".
  • Always include a free-text option.
  • Recommendation: "I'd suggest [X from CONTEXT.md] as out of scope, because the phase plan puts it in phase Y."

Q6: No-goes

"What's an absolute no-go, something that must under no circumstances be part of this solution?"

  • MC candidates from ADRs (rejected alternatives) + known constraints.
  • If no ADRs: compliance notes (GDPR, etc.), hard technical limits.
  • Always include a free-text option.
  • May be left empty, then drop the section from pitch.md.

Step 3: Write pitch.md

Right after Q6: no further questions.

Location: docs/pitches/pitch-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md in the project root. If docs/pitches/ doesn't exist: create it lazily. If no project root is detectable: the current directory.

Slug = 3–4 words from the problem, kebab-case.

Format: see references/pitch-template.md

Step 4: Handoff

After writing:

pitch.md is at docs/pitches/pitch-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md.

Next step: hand it to your planning/spec step (a domain review, a PRD, or the
grill-with-docs skill if you use one), point it at that file.

Edge cases

User runs /pitch with text: e.g. /pitch I want SMS reminders for bookings → Take that text as pre-context for Q1, but still ask Q1 and confirm.

User already has a pitch.md: ask whether to update it or start a new version.

No CONTEXT.md present: use defaults for Q2 + Q5 (see references/defaults.md). Note in the output: "No CONTEXT.md found: actors and out-of-scope suggestions are defaults."

User skips a question: ask once more. If still no input: leave the section empty and mark it in pitch.md as _Not answered: resolve during planning_.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.