help
Skill23 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks what MasterMind can do or how to drive it: \"help\", \"what can you do\", \"how do I use this\", \"what commands are there\", \"list your skills\", \"what are my options\": or when they seem unsure how to get started.
76 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- iskron-ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nearmap/shipyardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Jasenpan1987/multi-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewhale-hq/codewhale-plugin-marketplacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- onetapstudiogames/1f3d9-citylifetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 9 projects that use this
- +10 more from lilangMax
Other versions76 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 76
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- agenticnotetaking/arscontexta★ 3.5ksame name
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- waynesutton/markdown-site★ 628same name
- bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills★ 589same name
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin★ 501same name
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin-do-not-fork-currently-updating-v2-★ 500same name
66 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyzeSkill
- assessSkill
- blueprintSkill
- breakdownSkill
- buildSkill
- checklistSkill
- clarifySkill
- constitutionSkill
- convergeSkill
- debugSkill
- deepenSkill
- deprecateSkill
- double-checkSkill
- explainSkill
- handoffSkill
- initSkill
- interviewSkill
- learnSkill
- levelupSkill
- lintSkill
- living-docsSkill
- performanceSkill
- personaSkill
- promptSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qaSkill
- quarantineSkill
- reportSkill
- roadmapSkill
- routeSkill
- signatureSkill
- specifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 57 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Before the full menu, name up to three skills that would earn their keep here right now, each with the reason it applies: read from what's …
- Very specific: line 98
If MasterMind isn't set up for this project yet (no field pack for your stack), it will offer a one-time setup, say *"init"* or just start …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 57 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Help: what MasterMind can do, and how to use it
Present this as a clear, friendly menu (adapt length to the ask). Open with the brand header, then lead with the one thing that matters most, then the tables. Keep it scannable. Header:
🧠 MasterMind: a genius-builder brain for your AI
33 skills · 4 agents · Claude Code · Cursor · CodexLead with what fits this project
Before the full menu, name up to three skills that would earn their keep here right now, each with the reason it applies: read from what's actually in front of you (the stack, the current task, what the last few turns were about, whether a field pack exists yet):
Most useful here right now
· init: no field pack yet for this Django project; one-time setup, then I'm sharper on it
· quarantine: there's client data in this repo; this keeps it out of git
· handoff: this session is long; a handoff survives the resetA full menu is a catalogue; three fitting picks are advice. Then give the tables below: the catalogue still matters, because the point is that the user learns what they already own.
The one rule: you don't run commands: you just talk
MasterMind works by recognizing intent. Say what you want in plain language and it applies the right
skill or agent itself, then shows a short note that it did (e.g. 🧠 MasterMind ▸ building this, will verify
before handoff, with └ build · design → implement → verify beneath it). The /name calls below are an optional shortcut: a way to force a specific skill, not
something you need to memorize. Every skill is Auto (the model can invoke it); you can also call any
of them by hand.
Skills: the workflows (all Auto-invocable)
| Skill | What it does | Fires automatically when… | Call it by hand |
| init | set MasterMind up for this project: detect the stack (or ask what you're building), load the field pack | your first real task in a project it isn't set up for | "init" · "set up MasterMind" |
| build | design → implement → verify → review → capture, end to end | you ask to build/add/implement a non-trivial feature | "build a search box for the header" |
| debug | structured, evidence-first root-cause debugging | a bug is hard, weird, or keeps coming back | "debug why the list doesn't refresh" |
| performance | measure → find the real bottleneck → fix the biggest → verify | something's slow or janky ("why is this slow?") | "why is this page so slow?" |
| qa | prove a change works by driving it for real (+ optional tests) | you finish something / ask to test it | "qa this" · "write tests for it" |
| report | a shareable write-up of a cycle: changed files, decisions, verification, verdict (MD default, HTML on request) | you ask for a report; or end of build/qa if you turned it on (off by default) | "give me a report of this" · "reports on" |
| interview | turn a fuzzy ask into a crisp, buildable spec; resolve a written spec's open questions | the request is ambiguous, or a spec has open questions | "interview me about the checkout flow first" |
| assess | decide whether an idea deserves building: go, clarify or stop, with evidence | an idea nobody has said yes to yet | "is this worth building?" |
| constitution | write and version the rules every feature in this project must obey | you state a non-negotiable, or start spec-first work | "these are our non-negotiables" |
| living-docs | keep the product, business and tech documents current, each fact written once | docs are missing or stale, or a feature just finished | "write down how this product works" |
| specify | write a feature spec: what and why, prioritized stories, traceable requirements | a feature spans sessions, or touches money, auth or data | "write the spec for invitations" |
| blueprint | turn a spec into a technical plan, checked against the constitution | a spec has no plan yet | "plan this spec" |
| breakdown | cut the plan into tasks, grouped by user story so each ships alone | a plan has no task list yet | "break this into tasks" |
| checklist | test one concern's requirements (security, UX, API) before building | a sensitive feature heads into planning | "security checklist for this spec" |
| analyze | check spec, plan and tasks agree before any code, read-only | you're about to build from a task list | "is this ready to build?" |
| converge | check the built code against everything the feature promised; append the gaps | every box is ticked, or you ask "is it really done?" | "check the code against the spec" |
| route | load only the files/skills a task actually needs | a task is non-trivial or you're unsure where to start | "route this" |
| learn | get up to speed fast on an unfamiliar stack/API, verify assumptions | the tech is new, fast-moving, or you're guessing | "learn how the Stripe API handles refunds" |
| prototype | build a throwaway prototype to learn, then rebuild properly | the right approach is genuinely unknown | "throw together a quick prototype of this" |
| signature | capture your team's real conventions as durable rules it follows | you ask it to match your codebase / keep correcting the same thing | "make it match our patterns" |
| persona | write in the documented public style of a named engineer, cited | you ask for someone's style ("write like X") | "write this like Kent C. Dodds" |
| explain | write AI-friendly usage docs beside an internal package | an internal package has little/no docs (asks first) | "explain this package" |
| prompt | sharpen a vague prompt into a precise, AI-ready one | you ask to optimize/fix a prompt for an AI | "improve this prompt" |
| quarantine | set up a private, gitignored quarantine for confidential data | before capturing project/client-specific notes | "keep this client's data private" |
| levelup | improve MasterMind's own knowledge (lessons, curriculum, new field) | after a correction/review, or to refresh standards | "levelup: remember this" |
| double-check | interrogate a claim before handing it over: adversarial, reviewer never sees your conclusion | you're about to say "it works", or a review came back suspiciously clean | "are you sure? double-check it" |
| deprecate | remove/migrate/retire safely: expand → migrate → contract | deleting a feature, column, flag, or endpoint | "can we delete this?" |
| roadmap | a durable decision map for multi-week work | work spanning many sessions; "why did we decide X?" | "keep a roadmap for this project" |
| lint | check MasterMind's own files for bloat, repeated rules, contradictions | before a release, or the brain feels bloated | "lint the brain" |
| clarify | re-pitch an answer that did not land, in plain words or as a picture | you say "I did not follow that", "simpler", "you lost me" | "say that simply" |
| deepen | survey an area and rank where the design costs most, you pick one | "this is getting messy", "why is this so hard to change?" | "where is this hurting?" |
| handoff | write a concise handoff so work survives a reset/teammate | before a long-task /clear, pausing, or handing off | "write a handoff" |
| help | show this menu, what every skill/agent does and when it fires | you ask "what can you do?" / "help" / "how do I use this" | "what can you do?" |
Agents: the deep expert roles (isolated context)
Agents run in their own context for a focused job. MasterMind delegates to them inside a task; you can also summon one directly.
| Agent | What it does | Used automatically when… | Call it by hand |
| architect | designs the solution before code (boundaries, data model, APIs) | a feature is non-trivial (inside build) | "architect this feature" |
| code-reviewer | reviews a diff against the rigor gate; proposes fixes, never applies | after a change, before "done" | "review this" |
| refactorer | restructures working code to a better design, behavior-preserving | you ask to clean up / restructure working code | "refactor this component" |
| tech-scout | decides adopt-vs-build for a library/tool/pattern, with a verdict | choosing a dependency or approach | "should we use Zustand or Redux here?" |
Skills vs agents (one line)
Skills are inline workflows that run in the current conversation; agents are separate expert roles with their own fresh context for a heavier, focused job. You rarely pick. MasterMind reaches for the right one and tells you.
Getting set up
If MasterMind isn't set up for this project yet (no field pack for your stack), it will offer a one-time
setup, say "init" or just start working and it'll ask. Verify your install anytime with
~/.mastermind/install.sh --check.
Optional preferences (per project, kept in .mastermind/prefs.md; the first two are off by default):
- cycle report: a written write-up at the end of a build/QA cycle. Turn on: "reports on".
- plan-first: on bigger tasks, MasterMind shows the plan and waits for your OK before editing. Turn on: "plan first from now on".
- specs-dir: where spec-driven documents live,
specsunless that folder already holds something else.
The first two behave exactly as their implementations define them, skills/build/SKILL.md (plan-first gate) and
skills/report/SKILL.md (report formats).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

