agentleFS
mediajunkiemediajunkie/piper-morgan-product/.cursor/rules/completion-discipline.md

piper-morgan-product / rules

Cursor rule8 starsChanged 7 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Completion discipline

The file

We split this completion-discipline.md into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If you're uncertain about a decision but uncomfortable expressing it directly, just say: "Time Lord Alert" and the PM will pause for …

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    If you catch yourself thinking "this is good enough" → STOP and escalate immediately.

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    If ANY of these occur, you MUST stop immediately and escalate to PM - no exceptions:

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Read CLAUDE.md for methodology

    line 54
  5. Very specific:

    Check shared_types.py for ALL enums

    line 55
  6. Distinctive:

    Use Context7 MCP for latest docs

    line 56
  7. Distinctive:

    STOP if assumptions needed

    line 57
  8. Distinctive:

    Don't do Code's assigned work

    line 58
  9. Distinctive:

    No deferrals without PM approval

    line 65
  10. Distinctive:

    Update GitHub descriptions (not just comments)

    line 66
  11. Distinctive:

    If ANY occur, STOP and report to PM:

    line 71

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
completion-discipline.md

CURSOR COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS

Rule #1: No exceptions without PM approval

Breaking these rules = session failure. Ask first if uncertain.

The "Time Lord Alert" escape hatch

If you're uncertain about a decision but uncomfortable expressing it directly, just say: "Time Lord Alert" and the PM will pause for discussion. This is your face-saving signal - use it freely.

Anti-completion-bias protocol

YOU MUST NEVER:

  • Declare completion without 100% of acceptance criteria met
  • Rationalize gaps as "minor" or "not critical"
  • Skip STOP conditions because work is "almost done"
  • Defer tasks without explicit PM approval
  • Claim "tests pass" without providing terminal output

If you catch yourself thinking "this is good enough" → STOP and escalate immediately.

Mandatory STOP conditions (17 total)

If ANY of these occur, you MUST stop immediately and escalate to PM - no exceptions:

  1. Infrastructure doesn't match gameplan assumptions
  2. Method implementation <100% complete
  3. Pattern already exists in catalog
  4. Tests fail for any reason
  5. Configuration assumptions needed
  6. GitHub issue missing or unassigned
  7. Can't provide verification evidence
  8. ADR conflicts with approach
  9. Resource not found after searching
  10. User data at risk
  11. Completion bias detected (claiming without proof)
  12. Rationalizing gaps as "minor" or "optional"
  13. GitHub tracking not working
  14. Single agent seems sufficient (multi-agent is default)
  15. Git operations failing
  16. Server state unexpected or unclear
  17. UI behavior can't be visually confirmed

CRITICAL: YOU DO NOT DECIDE which failures are "critical" - the PM decides. Your job is to report the issue, provide options, and wait for PM guidance.

Context requirements (unchanged)

  1. Read CLAUDE.md for methodology
  2. Check shared_types.py for ALL enums
  3. Use Context7 MCP for latest docs
  4. STOP if assumptions needed
  5. Don't do Code's assigned work

Completion protocol (NEW)

All phases must be 100% complete before moving forward

  • Evidence required (terminal output, not claims)
  • No deferrals without PM approval
  • Update GitHub descriptions (not just comments)
  • Session logs must document all decisions

STOP conditions (immediate escalation)

If ANY occur, STOP and report to PM:

  • Tests fail (any failure, don't rationalize)
  • Assumptions needed (don't guess)
  • Pattern might exist elsewhere (check first)
  • Can't verify claims (no evidence available)
  • Infrastructure doesn't match expectations

Test failure reporting

If tests fail:

⚠️ STOP - [X] Tests Failing

Errors:
[paste output]

Root cause:
[your analysis]

Options:
1. [approach 1]
2. [approach 2]

Awaiting PM decision.

YOU DON'T DECIDE CRITICALITY - PM DOES.

Anti-patterns to avoid

❌ "Tests mostly pass" (all must pass) ❌ "Core functionality works" (everything must work) ❌ "Minor issue, not blocking" (PM decides priority) ❌ Skipping phases without approval ❌ Deferring work without permission

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.