agentleFS
mdsmithaustinmdsmithaustin/pstack/skills/principle-prove-it-works/SKILL.md

principle-prove-it-works

Skill9 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

53 other projects use a version of this, 50 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use Poteto Mode.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JoshueOsunaSkill

    Poteto Mode

    poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 5 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 53 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Verify every task output by checking the real thing directly.

    line 8
  2. Common:

    Check the real thing, not a proxy:

    line 12
  3. Common:

    Check process liveness directly, not indirectly through derived state

    line 13
  4. Common:

    Read the actual value, not a cached or derived representation

    line 14
  5. Common:

    When verification fails, suspect the observation method before suspecting the system

    line 15
  6. Distinctive:

    Run a named acceptance helper when the task or project requires it.

    line 27
  7. Very specific:

    Keep the artifact visible for the human.

    line 33

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 53 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prove It Works

Verify every task output by checking the real thing directly. Do not infer from proxies, self-reports, or "it compiles."

Why: Unverified work has unknown correctness. Indirect verification (file mtimes, output freshness, agent self-reports, cached screenshots) feels cheaper than direct observation. Acting on a wrong inference costs far more than checking the source.

Check the real thing, not a proxy:

  • Check process liveness directly, not indirectly through derived state
  • Read the actual value, not a cached or derived representation
  • When verification fails, suspect the observation method before suspecting the system

Account for the accepted scope

Check against the original accepted requirements. A plan, summary, or delegation cannot silently narrow them. Link each requirement to evidence or an explicit gap in the existing task record. An unmet requirement prevents a full completion claim. Preserve any backstop or judgment tags and record authorized scope changes separately. Reuse a runner's record when one exists.

When the work includes a threat model or security review, reconcile every declared threat with mitigation evidence at the threatened boundary. A claim of mitigation is not evidence. Record accepted risk with its authorized owner, transferred responsibility with its owner and evidence, or an open gap. Unresolved threats stay visible in the completion verdict.

Tie proof to the result

Record the artifact each check exercised, its revision when applicable, and the relevant environment. After combining changes, rerun checks for the affected paths on the integrated result. Separate passing branches do not prove their combination.

Run a named acceptance helper when the task or project requires it. If it cannot run, report the gap. Justify any replacement against the same acceptance criteria before treating it as equivalent.

Script the check when you can

The strongest proof is a deterministic script that re-runs the same comparison, not a one-time eyeball. Write the script, run it, and keep its output as an artifact a reviewer can re-run instead of trusting your word.

Keep the artifact visible for the human. Call the Skill tool with show-me-your-work for trail storage and evidence-retention rules.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.