multi-tenant-architecture
Skill189 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Designs tenant isolation, hostname routing, custom-domain lifecycle, and plan limits on Cloudflare or Vercel. Use when asked to "isolate tenant data", "support custom domains", "build a white-label platform", or assess PSL registration. For general module structure use codebase-architecture; for SEO content use seo.
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cvsz/zomegatheir own version, first seen Sep 2, 2026
- ElyzeSolutions/skillsedited, first seen Aug 6, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- ElyzeSolutions/skills★ 115% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- cvsz/zomega★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-readySkill
- agent-skills-creatorSkill
- agents-mdSkill
- app-verificationSkill
- autoshipSkill
- ax-auditSkill
- chat-historySkill
- ci-speedupSkill
- codebase-architectureSkill
- dx-auditSkill
- eli5Skill
- ghostwriterSkill
- planningSkill
- pr-babysitterSkill
- pr-creatorSkill
- presentation-creatorSkill
- product-designSkill
- save-mdSkill
- scaffold-cliSkill
- scaffold-nextjsSkill
- seoSkill
- test-auditSkill
- tidySkill
- typography-auditSkill
- ui-animationSkill
- ui-designSkill
- ui-verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 59
Put tenant workloads on a dedicated registrable domain (acme.app for tenants, acme.com for brand).
- Very specific: line 60
Keep the dashboard and auth on a different apex from tenant subdomains (app.acme.com for the console, *.acme.app for tenants).
- Very specific: line 79
Delete every inbound x-tenant-* header, set x-tenant-id, x-tenant-slug, x-tenant-plan from the resolved tenant, and forward them on the …
- Distinctive: line 95
Every tenant operation (create tenant, add domain, verify, remove) works over HTTP with the same authority as the UI.
- Distinctive: line 96
Run the evidence commands and paste results into the output.
- Distinctive: line 158
Run against local or preview before calling the design done.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Multi-Tenant Platform Architecture (Cloudflare or Vercel)
- IS: platform choice, domain strategy and PSL, tenant identification, compute and data isolation, hostname routing, tenant context propagation, custom domains and SSL, per-tenant static files, and mapping platform limits to plans.
- IS NOT: general folder structure or module contracts (use
codebase-architecture), scaffolding a new repo (usescaffold-nextjs), or the content of per-tenant SEO files once routing serves them dynamically: sitemap entries, canonical URLs, structured data, indexing policy (useseo).
Contents
- Platform dispatch (decide first)
- Reference files
- Workflow (order matters)
- Gotchas
- Output schema
- Evidence commands
- Related skills
Platform dispatch (decide first)
| Signals | Platform | Model |
| Tenants upload or generate their own code; code-level isolation; edge compute on KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2 | Cloudflare | Dispatch Worker in front of a dispatch namespace of per-tenant Workers; Cloudflare for SaaS for custom hostnames |
| Every tenant runs the same Next.js codebase and differs by content, branding, and plan; ISR, Server Components, Vercel deploys | Vercel | One deployment; proxy.ts resolves the tenant from the hostname; wildcard plus custom domains on the project |
- Pick one platform per product. Fronting a Vercel app with a Cloudflare proxy doubles the TLS and redirect layers and is the usual cause of redirect loops and failed certificate issuance.
- Tenants shipping their own code on Vercel is the multi-project model (one Vercel project per tenant, created with the SDK). It follows the Cloudflare row's isolation reasoning; this skill's Vercel references cover the single-deployment model only.
Reference files
| File | Read when |
| cloudflare-platform.md | Cloudflare chosen: dispatch namespaces, routing, Cloudflare for SaaS custom hostnames, isolation modes, KV and D1 (steps 3 to 7) |
| vercel-platform.md | Vercel chosen: proxy.ts resolution, App Router layout, Global Config lookups, per-tenant static files, custom subpaths, local dev (steps 4 to 7) |
| vercel-domains.md | Vercel chosen: SDK domain lifecycle, DNS targets, verification, wildcard nameservers, SSL, troubleshooting (step 7) |
| data-isolation.md | Step 3 on either platform: shared schema with RLS, schema-per-tenant, database-per-tenant, and the Postgres/Supabase/Drizzle policy pattern |
| psl.md | Step 1 when tenants publish content or run code on sibling subdomains: eligibility, submission, interim cookie controls |
| limits-and-quotas.md | Step 8: Cloudflare, Vercel, and Neon limit names with the official source for each, to map onto plans |
Workflow (order matters)
Copy this checklist to track progress:
Multi-tenant progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Domain strategy and PSL decision
- [ ] Step 2: Tenant identification strategy
- [ ] Step 3: Isolation model (compute and data)
- [ ] Step 4: Deterministic routing
- [ ] Step 5: Tenant context propagation
- [ ] Step 6: Tenant config and least-privilege bindings
- [ ] Step 7: Custom domains and per-tenant static files
- [ ] Step 8: Limits mapped to plans, evidence captured- Choose the domain strategy
- Put tenant workloads on a dedicated registrable domain (
acme.appfor tenants,acme.comfor brand). One phishing tenant onx.acme.computs the whole domain on blocklists, and a tenant cookie withDomain=acme.comreaches your dashboard. - Keep the dashboard and auth on a different apex from tenant subdomains (
app.acme.comfor the console,*.acme.appfor tenants). - If tenants publish content or run code on sibling subdomains, submit the label directly above the tenant name (
acme.app, orsites.acme.appfor<tenant>.sites.acme.app) to the PSL and start now: there is no SLA. Tenant-owned custom domains need no PSL entry. Otherwise recordNo PSLwith the reason.
- Choose tenant identification (one primary; custom domain as the upgrade path)
- Subdomain
tenant.acme.app: wildcard DNS plus wildcard certificate. The default. - Custom domain
tenant.com: the tenant CNAMEs to you. Paying tenants; reputation shifts to them; needs the onboarding lifecycle in step 7. - Path
acme.app/tenant: no per-tenant DNS or certificates, but no cookie isolation and no branding. Choose it only when tenants will never get a hostname.
- Define the isolation model
- Compute, Cloudflare: one dispatch namespace in untrusted mode; per-invocation
cpuMsandsubRequestslimits per plan; an outbound Worker if tenant code may call the internet. - Compute, Vercel: one deployment, tenant code never executes. If tenants must ship code, move to Vercel multi-project or Cloudflare rather than sandboxing inside the app.
- Data: shared schema with
tenant_idon every tenant-aware table plus RLS is the default; database-per-tenant for regulated or noisy tenants, selectable per plan. See data-isolation.md.
- Route deterministically (tenants never influence routing or see each other)
- Cloudflare: a single
*/*route on the SaaS zone to the dispatch Worker; hostname -> tenant record (KV, D1 on miss) ->env.DISPATCHER.get(script);Worker not found-> 404. - Vercel:
proxy.ts(Next.js 16;middleware.tswithruntime: 'nodejs'on 15) readshost, looks the tenant up in Global Config or the database, rewrites into the tenant segment; unknown hostname -> 404, never the brand site. - Let
/.well-knownthrough before any tenant rewrite. Routerobots.txt,sitemap.xml, andllms.txtinto the tenant segment so they vary per tenant.
- Propagate tenant context from one authority
- Delete every inbound
x-tenant-*header, setx-tenant-id,x-tenant-slug,x-tenant-planfrom the resolved tenant, and forward them on the request (NextResponse.next({ request: { headers } })). Server Components readawait headers(); route handlers readrequest.headers. Cloudflare: the dispatch Worker sets headers or passes parameters beforefetch. - The proxy is routing, not authorization. Server Functions, route handlers, and jobs re-derive the tenant from the session and the data layer enforces it (RLS or
tenant_idpredicates).
- Bind only what the tenant needs
- Cloudflare: each user Worker gets its own bindings (KV namespace, D1 database, R2 prefix); adding a binding is an explicit redeploy. No shared globals.
- Vercel: Global Config holds only
hostname -> { id, slug, plan }; the database is the source of truth and write-through happens when a domain verifies. Feature flags and branding come from the database keyed by tenant id.
- Support custom domains and per-tenant static files
- Lifecycle to design and record: add domain -> show DNS target -> verify ownership -> certificate issued -> mapping activated -> removal or failure path.
- Cloudflare: Cloudflare for SaaS custom hostname on the SaaS zone, proxied fallback origin,
customers.<you>.comCNAME target,httportxtvalidation, pre-validate before DNS cutover. See cloudflare-platform.md. - Vercel:
projectsAddProjectDomain-> DNS values from the project's domain card ->_vercelTXT only if the domain is already on Vercel ->projectsVerifyProjectDomain-> Let's Encrypt HTTP-01. See vercel-domains.md. robots.txt,sitemap.xml,llms.txtare route handlers inside the tenant segment with explicitContent-Type; nothing tenant-specific lives in/public. Their content isseoterritory.
- Surface limits as plans and capture evidence
- Fill the limits-to-plan table from limits-and-quotas.md, reading each current value from its source URL and dating it; enforce at the routing layer (Cloudflare
limits, Vercel plan header plus server checks). - Nothing long-running in the request path: Cloudflare Queues or Workflows, Vercel background functions or cron.
- Every tenant operation (create tenant, add domain, verify, remove) works over HTTP with the same authority as the UI; if it only works in the dashboard, the platform leaks into the UI.
- Run the evidence commands and paste results into the output.
Gotchas
Platform and data gotchas live in the reference for that step; these fire before any reference loads.
- Forwarding inbound tenant headers:
curl -H "x-tenant-id: <other>"then serves another tenant's data. Delete or overwritex-tenant-*on every path through the proxy or dispatch Worker, including paths that skip resolution (/.well-known, the brand site). - A hostname map keyed in a restricted alphabet (Global Config allows only
^[\w-]+$) needs a collision-free encoding or a hash; replacing dots with underscores mapsa-b.example.comanda.b-example.comto one key. Keep the original hostname in the record and compare it on read. - Starting path-based with custom domains on the roadmap means URL rewrites, cookie changes, and DNS migration later.
Output schema
Length follows the decisions: drop any section the project does not face rather than filling it.
# Multi-tenant architecture
## Platform decision
- Platform: Cloudflare | Vercel
- Why this platform:
- Rejected platform and reason:
## Domain map
- Brand domain:
- Tenant domain:
- Tenant subdomains:
- Custom domains:
- PSL decision: Submit (suffix, owner, PR link, _psl TXT date) | No PSL (reason)
## Routing matrix
| Host pattern | Resolver | Destination | Unknown tenant behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
## Tenant context flow
- Authority: proxy.ts | dispatch Worker
- Headers set and stripped:
- Server read path:
- Data-layer enforcement:
## Isolation model
- Compute isolation:
- Data isolation (and per-plan variant):
- Config/binding isolation:
## Custom-domain lifecycle
1. DNS target:
2. Ownership verification:
3. Certificate provisioning:
4. Routing activation:
5. Removal/failure path:
## Limits-to-plan table
| Limit | Source URL / access date | Free | Pro | Enterprise | Enforcement point |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
## Validation evidence
| Check | Command | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|Evidence commands
Run against local or preview before calling the design done; mark N/A with a reason.
| Check | Command | Expected |
| Tenant boundary exists in code | rg -n "x-tenant-id|CREATE POLICY|FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY|DISPATCHER.get" . | Hits in proxy or dispatch Worker and in the schema |
| Unknown host is 404 | curl -sI -H "Host: nope.acme.app" <url> | 404 |
| Forged header ignored | curl -s -H "Host: a.acme.app" -H "x-tenant-id: tenant-b" <url>/api/whoami | Tenant A |
| Static files vary | curl -s -H "Host: a.acme.app" <url>/robots.txt vs -H "Host: b.acme.app" | Different bodies, Content-Type: text/plain |
| RLS holds for the app role | psql -c "BEGIN; SET LOCAL ROLE app_user; SELECT set_config('app.tenant_id','<t1>',true); SELECT count(*) FROM posts; ROLLBACK;" | Only tenant t1's rows |
| ACME path reachable | curl -sI -H "Host: tenant.com" <url>/.well-known/acme-challenge/test | Not a redirect into the tenant segment |
| Limits current | Access date next to each URL in the limits table | Dated within the planning window |
Related skills
codebase-architecture: folder structure, module contracts, and the request-context pipeline for the application itself.scaffold-nextjs: bootstrap the Next.js turborepo before applying these tenancy patterns.seo: content of per-tenantrobots.txt,sitemap.xml,llms.txt, canonical URLs, and structured data once routing serves them.
Maintenance only: evals/evals.json contains regression scenarios for changes to this skill; it does not load during a user task.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

