verify
Skill7 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Check previews or CI behavior, report results and remaining help; also tests APIs or screenshots.
- Reads credentials
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- pytorch/heliontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- amir20/dozzletheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-browserSkill
- applySkill
- browserSkill
- closeSkill
- connectSkill
- continueSkill
- dailySkill
- dream-memorySkill
- exploreSkill
- hand-overSkill
- improve-codeSkill
- lessonSkill
- memorySkill
- paste-this-into-your-aiSkill
- planSkill
- saveSkill
- scheduleSkill
- servicesSkill
- shipSkill
- shopSkill
- update-dependenciesSkill
- wong-setupSkill
- wong-syncSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 9
Check fresh scenarios on the exact saved revision.
- Distinctive: line 33
No token/surviving block → unverified.
- Very specific: line 55
Keep journeys/evidence outside the repo, bar /ship's kept checks.
- Very specific: line 56
Never merge/archive: /ship owns that.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/verify
Check fresh scenarios on the exact saved revision. Reference: how; wiki: why. Gates nothing.
Authorized: needed /save (kept checks' too), browser install, Access heal, staging preparation and § a's writes; other permissions join the handoff.
Order
ROOT="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
bash "$ROOT/.claude/skills/verify/scripts/verify-staging.sh" scout-check
bash "$ROOT/.claude/skills/verify/scripts/verify-staging.sh" preflight- Scout the change this chat or the caller named, else the branch's own, archived included (rungs). Asks name candidates' scenarios. READY → match probes/recipes/consumers by § a; nothing reachable → NONE, name exclusions and stop.
- Bind. Run
node "$ROOT/.claude/skills/save/scripts/saved-revision.mjs"with the caller's--checkpoint <file>. NEEDS_SAVE →/save; SAVED → reuse its matching receipt or read the existing gate. UNKNOWN → unverified. Never save to find out, edit records, or rerun settled checks: each starts another round of checks. Prepare independently. Thenpreflight(allow 12 minutes for the staging turn); no browser journeys →--no-browser.SEEDED=nobeside aTURNline → staging-data checks unverified, with its reason; reportTURN=unavailable. CI-only/missing preview →--no-preview --no-browser, then collect. A blocked or failed prerequisite pauses only its dependents; never guess URLs: one can answer for a commit never deployed. Recheck head before posting; changes require fresh evidence. - Walk/grade by §§ b–f; finish independent safe checks before repairs. Inside
/ship, add kept checks. - FAILURE → judge scope. In scope → collect failures, fix once,
/save,preflight, repeat affected checks at most twice; retain independent evidence only with unchanged dependencies; otherwise report. - Simulate/report by § f; one report covers surfaces/retries, heals/fixes/installs and scope/limits. Ask the next step with the question tool; inside
/ship, return the verdict.
When a block stops the walk
Heal once per invocation, never on BLOCK=not-own-site; retry dependents only.
BLOCK=access-challenge (exit 3): mint a repo-named service token with the Cloudflare API token, widening if needed. Confirm the preview app's machine policy accepts it; keep human permissions. Store it as CF_ACCESS_STAGING_CLIENT_ID/SECRET in the primary worktree's .env only (secrets, Access, authorized widen). Name the mint; never print/commit credentials. Privacy changes need human login/revocation checks; machine access proves no email login.
No token/surviving block → unverified; name credentials/repair gaps.
Plain checks
Named screenshot/request/click-through: skip scout, use its address and mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/wong-verify-XXXXXX"; otherwise bind/preflight. Same safeguards/handoff. Past pictures: verify-staging.sh pictures <pr>. Show evidence; post only if asked; cleanup.
Verdicts
| Verdict | Meaning | Report |
| NONE | no scenario reachable | what was there instead |
| SUCCESS | no contradiction or blocked reachable check | evidence, including each partly shown claim |
| FAILURE | evidence contradicts a THEN | evidence, fix only in scope |
| UNKNOWN | reachable check blocked or ambiguous | unverified, why and needed help |
| TIMEOUT | budget exceeded | unverified, what completed and where it stopped |
Precedence: FAILURE, TIMEOUT, UNKNOWN. UNKNOWN is not NONE (why).
Hard rules
agent-browser/Chrome only for browser journeys. New probe runtimes ask first; bundled collector authorized. No repo dependencies.- Saved-source previews/validated CI captures; no local repo execution/invented tooling. Read-only recipes; written expectations judge.
- Keep journeys/evidence outside the repo, bar
/ship's kept checks;cleanupon every exit, including UNKNOWN/handoff. - Never merge/archive:
/shipowns that.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

