agentleFS
matejformanekmatejformanek/postgres-claude/.claude/skills/pg-patch-review/SKILL.md

pg-patch-review

Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoPostgreSQLView on GitHub

Run a multi-agent comprehensive review of a PostgreSQL patch (CommitFest entry, GitHub PR, or local .patch file) — orchestrates the mechanical pre-amble (fetch + apply + build + regress / iso / TAP) and then fans out 5 critic sub-agents IN PARALLEL (architecture / invariants critic cross-checking knowledge/subsystems/*.md INV-* tags, breaking-change critic for on-disk / WAL / catalog / extension-ABI, test-coverage critic, style / commit-message critic, reviewer-reflex critic against knowledge/calibration/gap-catalog.md), then synthesizes one PG-house-style review email. Stage 3 verdict supports REJECT-A/B/C grades for design-level rejections. Use when the user says "/pg-review <CF# | PR# | patchfile>", "deep-review this patch", "comprehensive review of CF NNNN", "mailing-grade review of this patch", or "run the 5-critic fan-out on <patch>". Skip for non-PG patch review, self-review-before-mail (use patch-submission), the lightweight 7-phase walk (use review-checklist), generic GitHub PR review (use review-changes), and security audits (use security-review).

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.