pg-feature-plan
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoPostgreSQLView on GitHub
Drop a heavy, citation-rich implementation plan for a scoped PostgreSQL backend feature — Phase 2 of the two-phase PG planner, the bridge from a brainstorm-with-picked-approach to /pg-implement. Names every src/backend or src/include file that must change with file:line cites at a pinned anchor, enumerates catalog / CATALOG_VERSION_NO / WAL / on-disk / lock-order / extension-ABI risks, proposes the test surface (regress / iso / TAP), structures the patch into independently-reviewable phases, picks a CommitFest landing strategy, and emits the plan-mode plan that /pg-implement executes phase-by-phase with plan-linked commits. **Use proactively whenever the user invokes /pg-plan, says "plan this PG feature", "make a plan for X in PG", "drop a heavy plan", "plan-mode plan for [PG feature]", "i picked option [A/B/C] in the brainstorm, now plan it", "we settled on the [approach] for the [PG topic], write me the phase plan with file:line cites", "spec-to-plan this pgsql-hackers thread", "shadow-implementation plan against [hackers URL]", "REJECT-track plan for CF NNNN", or has a brainstorm doc + a picked approach for a PostgreSQL backend change and wants the file-by-file rollout — even when they don't use the literal word "plan".** Skip when the idea is still exploratory and no approach is picked (use pg-feature-brainstorm first), for product / sprint / Q4 / roadmap / Jira / OKR planning, application architecture planning, Terraform / k8s / Helm / Ansible / CI infrastructure plans, React / Redux / Zustand / Vue / Angular frontend refactor plans, migration plans between non-PG databases (MySQL→PG migration is a DBA migration plan, not a PG feature plan), generic non-PG database feature planning (SQLite, DuckDB, MongoDB, MySQL features), and code-review of an already-submitted patch (use pg-patch-review or review-checklist).
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- access-method-apisSkill
- aio-readstreamSkill
- backup-and-recoverySkill
- bgworker-and-extensionsSkill
- buffer-managerSkill
- build-and-runSkill
- catalog-conventionsSkill
- coding-styleSkill
- collation-providerSkill
- commit-message-styleSkill
- copy-familySkill
- corpus-chainSkill
- custom-scan-apiSkill
- debuggingSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- executor-and-plannerSkill
- extended-statisticsSkill
- extension-developmentSkill
- fdw-developmentSkill
- fmgr-and-spiSkill
- free-space-mapSkill
- gucs-configSkill
- jsonpath-and-jsonbSkill
- lockingSkill
- logical-replicationSkill
- memory-contextsSkill
- memory-keepingSkill
- meta-commit-styleSkill
- multixactSkill
- node-infrastructureSkill
- parallel-querySkill
- parser-and-nodesSkill
- patch-submissionSkill
- pg-claudeSkill
- pg-feature-brainstormSkill
- pg-implementSkill
- pg-patch-reviewSkill
- pg-shadow-implementSkill
- pgstat-frameworkSkill
- pg-upgrade-internalsSkill
- physical-replicationSkill
- planner-cost-modelSkill
- plpgsql-internalsSkill
- process-lifecycleSkill
- psqlSkill
- replication-overviewSkill
- resource-ownersSkill
- review-checklistSkill
- row-level-securitySkill
- slru-infrastructureSkill
- snapshot-managementSkill
- testingSkill
- toast-storageSkill
- type-cacheSkill
- vacuum-autovacuumSkill
- wal-and-xlogSkill
- wire-protocolSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
29 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈19
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

