agentleFS
masteranimemasteranime/n8n-claude-skills/skills/workflow-architect/SKILL.md

workflow-architect

Skill32 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design production-grade n8n workflows from requirements. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build, design, architect, or plan an n8n workflow or automation — including phrases like "build me a workflow", "design an automation", "create an n8n flow", "how should I structure this in n8n", or any request involving connecting services (webhooks, APIs, databases, LLMs, email, WhatsApp, Stripe, Google Sheets, etc.) through n8n. Also use when the user describes a business process and wants it automated. Always use this skill before generating n8n workflow JSON or recommending node structures — do not rely on memory of n8n node names or expression syntax.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. magnus919/agent-skills★ 172same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Idempotency by default: If the workflow could be retriggered (webhook, cron, polling), include a checkpoint — a MySQL/Postgres lookup on a …

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Sub-workflows for reuse: If logic exceeds ~8 nodes or is called from multiple places (e.g., error handling, notifications), extract into an …

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow these steps in order.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask (or infer) exactly ONE trigger type:

    line 28
  5. Very specific:

    If using LLMs (Claude, OpenAI, Groq), reference the chain-llm-pattern skill for multi-step reasoning.

    line 71
  6. Very specific:

    Use the LangChain nodes (AI Agent, Basic LLM Chain, Information Extractor) for structured outputs, NOT raw HTTP Request to the LLM API — …

    line 73
  7. Very specific:

    Every node needs id (UUID), name (unique in workflow), type (exact n8n type), typeVersion (integer), position ([x, y]), and parameters …

    line 91
  8. Very specific:

    Use typeVersion: 1 as a safe default unless you know a newer version is required.

    line 93
  9. Distinctive:

    If the user asked for a description rather than importable JSON, produce a clean numbered list matching Step 2 format and offer to generate …

    line 97
  10. Distinctive:

    Do NOT produce workflows that:

    line 101
  11. Very specific:

    Use Function nodes for logic that has a purpose-built node (e.g., Split In Batches, Merge, Item Lists)

    line 104
  12. Distinctive:

    Don't guess — ask ONE consolidated clarifying question covering:

    line 110

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

n8n Workflow Architect

You are designing a production n8n workflow, not a demo. The workflow must survive real data, real failures, and real volume.

Core principles (apply every time)

  1. Real node names, not guesses. n8n is strict about capitalization and spacing. Use Google Sheets not Googlesheets. HTTP Request not HttpRequest. Webhook not webhook trigger. If unsure, say so — don't invent.
  2. Expression syntax is ={{ $json.field }}. The leading = marks the whole field as an expression. Without it, n8n treats the value as a literal string. This is the #1 hallucination source.
  3. Every external call needs an error branch. Wrap API calls in an IF or use continueOnFail: true + a downstream IF that checks {{ $json.error }}. Never assume third parties don't fail.
  4. Idempotency by default. If the workflow could be retriggered (webhook, cron, polling), include a checkpoint — a MySQL/Postgres lookup on a natural key, or a Google Sheets row check. Reference the mysql-checkpointing skill for the pattern.
  5. Sub-workflows for reuse. If logic exceeds ~8 nodes or is called from multiple places (e.g., error handling, notifications), extract into an Execute Workflow sub-workflow.

Workflow design process

Follow these steps in order. Skipping steps produces demo-quality output.

Step 1: Clarify the trigger

Ask (or infer) exactly ONE trigger type:

TriggerUse when
WebhookExternal system pushes events (Stripe, Meta, custom APIs)
Schedule TriggerRecurring jobs (daily reports, hourly polls)
Manual TriggerAdmin-triggered, testing
Form TriggerUser-facing intake
Chat TriggerConversational agents
Execute Workflow TriggerCalled by another workflow

Webhooks in production need: signature verification (HMAC), idempotency key extraction, and a 200 response within 3s (use Respond to Webhook early, process async).

Step 2: Map the happy path

Draft the node sequence as a numbered list BEFORE writing JSON. Each node gets:

  • Node type (exact n8n name)
  • Purpose (one sentence)
  • Key config (the one or two parameters that matter)

Example:

1. Webhook (POST /stripe-events) — receives Stripe events
2. Code — verify HMAC signature against STRIPE_SIGNING_SECRET header
3. IF — branch on signature valid
4. Respond to Webhook — return 200 immediately (no payload)
5. MySQL — SELECT from processed_webhooks WHERE event_id = {{ $('Webhook').item.json.body.id }}
...

Step 3: Add error paths

For EACH external call node, answer:

  • What failure modes exist? (timeout, 4xx, 5xx, rate limit, malformed response)
  • What's the recovery? (retry with backoff, fallback vendor, dead-letter queue, alert)

Common patterns:

  • Retry with backoff: Wait node (exponential: 2^n seconds) → loop back via Execute Workflow calling itself with a retry counter
  • Fallback vendor: IF on error → alternative vendor node (e.g., WhatsApp fails → Twilio SMS)
  • Dead letter: Error → MySQL insert into failed_jobs table with payload + error message

Step 4: Wire the LLM steps correctly

If using LLMs (Claude, OpenAI, Groq), reference the chain-llm-pattern skill for multi-step reasoning. Key rules:

  • Use the LangChain nodes (AI Agent, Basic LLM Chain, Information Extractor) for structured outputs, NOT raw HTTP Request to the LLM API — the LangChain nodes handle JSON parsing, retries, and token accounting.
  • For JSON outputs, use Information Extractor with an explicit schema, not "please return JSON" in a system prompt.
  • Set maxTokens explicitly — n8n defaults can silently truncate.
  • Pin an example input during development (right-click node → "Pin Data") so downstream nodes have stable schemas to build against.

Step 5: Output

Produce the workflow as valid n8n workflow JSON. Structure:

{
  "name": "Workflow Name",
  "nodes": [...],
  "connections": {...},
  "settings": { "executionOrder": "v1" }
}

Every node needs id (UUID), name (unique in workflow), type (exact n8n type), typeVersion (integer), position ([x, y]), and parameters (node-specific config).

Use typeVersion: 1 as a safe default unless you know a newer version is required.

For connections, main is the default output — branching nodes (IF, Switch) have multiple output indices.

If the user asked for a description rather than importable JSON, produce a clean numbered list matching Step 2 format and offer to generate JSON.

Anti-patterns to refuse

Do NOT produce workflows that:

  • Store credentials inline (always use n8n credential references: {{ $credentials.apiKey }})
  • Poll an API every minute when a webhook exists
  • Use Function nodes for logic that has a purpose-built node (e.g., Split In Batches, Merge, Item Lists)
  • Return raw LLM output to end users without validation
  • Assume a list/array is always populated (always handle empty arrays)

When the user's request is vague

Don't guess — ask ONE consolidated clarifying question covering:

  • Trigger source + frequency
  • External services involved
  • What happens on failure (silent drop? alert? retry?)
  • Data destination

One question, not five. Move fast.

Reference files

  • references/node-catalog.md — curated list of battle-tested nodes for common tasks
  • references/expressions-cheatsheet.md — n8n expression syntax, common patterns, gotchas

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.