agentleFS
masteranimemasteranime/n8n-claude-skills/skills/mysql-checkpointing/SKILL.md

mysql-checkpointing

Skill32 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Make n8n workflows idempotent, resumable, and safe at scale using MySQL/Postgres checkpoint tables, batch processing patterns, duplicate prevention, and dynamic table creation. Use this skill whenever the user is building an n8n workflow that processes batches of data, handles webhooks, polls APIs, or runs on a schedule — phrases like "idempotent pipeline", "batch processing", "don't process duplicates", "resumable workflow", "checkpoint", "process 10000 rows", "handle failures gracefully". Also use whenever webhook handlers, ETL jobs, or scraping pipelines are being built. Use this skill proactively — missing checkpoints is the #1 cause of duplicate charges, duplicate emails, and duplicate API calls in production n8n.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Check THIS FIRST in every workflow.

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    Every error branch writes here.

    line 44
  3. Distinctive:

    Use n8n's MySQL credentials, not inline connection strings.

    line 143
  4. Distinctive:

    Add a dashboard query (just a Google Sheets export via scheduled workflow) that reports:

    line 149

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

MySQL Checkpointing for n8n

Idempotency is not optional. Any workflow that can be re-run must produce identical results on the second run. MySQL (or Postgres — patterns are identical) is the pragmatic way.

The three checkpoint tables every pipeline needs

1. processed_items — did we already handle this?

CREATE TABLE processed_items (
  item_key VARCHAR(255) PRIMARY KEY,      -- natural ID (webhook event_id, order_id, etc.)
  workflow_name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
  processed_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  status VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,            -- 'success' | 'failed' | 'skipped'
  payload_hash VARCHAR(64),               -- SHA256 of payload, detects payload changes
  INDEX idx_workflow_status (workflow_name, status),
  INDEX idx_processed_at (processed_at)
);

Check THIS FIRST in every workflow. Before any side-effect (email, charge, API call), SELECT item_key FROM processed_items WHERE item_key = ?. If it exists, exit.

2. failed_jobs — dead letter queue

CREATE TABLE failed_jobs (
  id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
  workflow_name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
  item_key VARCHAR(255),
  payload JSON,
  error_message TEXT,
  error_node VARCHAR(100),                -- which n8n node failed
  retry_count INT DEFAULT 0,
  failed_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  INDEX idx_workflow_retry (workflow_name, retry_count)
);

Every error branch writes here. A retry workflow runs on schedule, picks up retry_count < 3, attempts reprocessing, bumps counter.

3. batch_runs — resumability

CREATE TABLE batch_runs (
  id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
  workflow_name VARCHAR(100),
  last_cursor VARCHAR(255),               -- last ID / timestamp processed
  items_processed INT DEFAULT 0,
  status VARCHAR(20),                     -- 'running' | 'complete' | 'failed'
  started_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  completed_at TIMESTAMP NULL
);

For batch jobs (scraping, enrichment, imports): persist the cursor after each chunk. On restart, resume from last_cursor instead of starting over.

The canonical idempotent workflow

1. Trigger (Webhook / Schedule)
2. Set — normalize input, compute item_key
3. MySQL — SELECT item_key FROM processed_items WHERE item_key = {{ $json.item_key }}
4. IF — results.length > 0?
   ├── True: Respond (already processed) → END
   └── False: continue
5. [Actual work: API calls, LLM, etc.]
6. IF — work succeeded?
   ├── True:
   │   7a. MySQL — INSERT INTO processed_items (item_key, workflow_name, status) VALUES (?, ?, 'success')
   │   8a. Respond success
   └── False:
       7b. MySQL — INSERT INTO failed_jobs (workflow_name, item_key, payload, error_message, error_node) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
       8b. Respond error (but with 2xx to prevent webhook re-delivery loops if caller retries)

The crucial detail: insert into processed_items BEFORE responding to the caller, not after. If insert fails, response should fail too — caller retries, which is fine because we weren't recorded.

Batch processing pattern

For workflows processing 100s+ rows, never load all into memory:

1. MySQL — SELECT ... WHERE id > {{ $json.last_cursor }} ORDER BY id LIMIT 100
2. IF — results empty? → END (mark batch_run complete)
3. Split In Batches — batchSize: 10
4. [Process each item, including the idempotent check above]
5. MySQL — UPDATE batch_runs SET last_cursor = {{ last ID }}, items_processed = items_processed + batch.length WHERE id = {{ $batchRunId }}
6. Execute Workflow — call SELF recursively, passing batch_run.id

Why self-recursion: avoids n8n's memory limits on long-running workflows. Each invocation processes 100 items then hands off.

Dynamic table creation pattern

For pipelines where each client/project needs its own table (e.g., scraping per domain), don't hardcode:

// Code node
const sanitized = $input.item.json.client_id.replace(/[^a-z0-9_]/gi, '_');
const tableName = `leads_${sanitized}`;

return {
  json: {
    create_sql: `
      CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ${tableName} (
        id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
        email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,
        full_name VARCHAR(255),
        enriched_at TIMESTAMP,
        INDEX idx_email (email)
      )
    `,
    table_name: tableName
  }
};

Then a MySQL node runs {{ $json.create_sql }}. Safe because you sanitized client_id.

Never CREATE TABLE {{ $json.user_input }} without sanitization — SQL injection via table name.

Duplicate prevention beyond primary key

Primary keys catch exact duplicates. For semantic duplicates (e.g., same lead with different casing / extra whitespace), use a computed canonical key:

// Code node before INSERT
const email = $json.email.toLowerCase().trim();
const phone = $json.phone?.replace(/\D/g, '') ?? '';
const canonical_key = `${email}|${phone}`;
return { json: { ...$json, canonical_key } };

Then make canonical_key a UNIQUE column. INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE handles it cleanly.

Connection handling

  • Use n8n's MySQL credentials, not inline connection strings.
  • Set connectionLimit: 5 in the credential — n8n can spawn many parallel executions and exhaust the DB connection pool.
  • For Postgres, use pg_bouncer upstream if running >10 parallel executions.

Observability

Add a dashboard query (just a Google Sheets export via scheduled workflow) that reports:

  • Yesterday's processed count per workflow
  • Failed jobs count per workflow (alert if >threshold)
  • Median processing time (from processed_at - started_at)

Without this, silent regressions stay silent for weeks.

Anti-patterns

  • Using uuid() as item_key when a natural key exists. Stripe gives you event_id. Use it. UUID-based keys defeat idempotency because retries generate new UUIDs.
  • Checking processed_items AFTER doing the work. Defeats the whole point. Check first, do work, record.
  • Storing huge payloads in failed_jobs.payload. Truncate to 10KB or store S3 pointer. MySQL slows down with JSON columns over ~1MB.
  • No index on processed_at. You'll want to query "what failed today" — without the index, full table scan.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.