observability-logging-baseline
Skill4 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when establishing observability foundations including structured logging, metrics, and distributed tracing using OpenTelemetry standards.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agents-onboardingSkill
- agent-workitem-automationSkill
- architecture-testingSkill
- aspire-integration-testingSkill
- automated-standards-enforcementSkill
- best-practice-introductionSkill
- branching-strategy-and-conventionsSkill
- broken-windowSkill
- change-risk-rollbackSkill
- ci-cd-conformanceSkill
- component-boundary-ownershipSkill
- contract-consistency-validationSkill
- csharp-best-practicesSkill
- deployment-provenanceSkill
- documentation-as-codeSkill
- documentation-scaffoldSkill
- dotnet-bespoke-code-minimisationSkill
- dotnet-best-practicesSkill
- dotnet-domain-primitivesSkill
- dotnet-efcore-practicesSkill
- dotnet-healthchecksSkill
- dotnet-logging-serilogSkill
- dotnet-mapping-standardSkill
- dotnet-open-source-first-governanceSkill
- dotnet-source-generation-firstSkill
- dotnet-specification-patternSkill
- dotnet-testing-assertionsSkill
- environment-traceabilitySkill
- finishing-a-development-branch-iddSkill
- greenfield-baselineSkill
- impacted-scope-enforcementSkill
- incremental-change-impactSkill
- incremental-deploymentSkill
- innersource-governance-bootstrapSkill
- issue-driven-deliverySkill
- library-extraction-stabilisationSkill
- local-dev-experienceSkill
- markdown-authorSkill
- modern-csharp-coding-standardsSkill
- monorepo-orchestration-setupSkill
- pair-programmingSkill
- persona-switchingSkill
- process-skill-routerSkill
- quality-gate-enforcementSkill
- release-tagging-planSkill
- repo-best-practices-bootstrapSkill
- repository-foundation-bootstrapSkill
- requirements-gatheringSkill
- runtime-tooling-validationSkill
- safe-brownfield-refactorSkill
- scoped-colocationSkill
- security-processesSkill
- selective-build-testSkill
- semantic-version-impactSkill
- session-awareSkill
- skills-first-workflowSkill
- static-analysis-securitySkill
- structured-review-workflowSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. About 0 are common, 22 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈22
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Add correlation ID middleware to propagate request context
- Distinctive: line 45
Use structured logging with message templates, not string interpolation.
- Distinctive: line 46
Prefer OpenTelemetry standards over vendor-specific SDKs.
- Distinctive: line 98
Every request should carry a correlation ID:
- Distinctive: line 193
Follow OpenTelemetry semantic conventions:
- Distinctive: line 268
If PR adds logging, verify message templates are used (not interpolation).
- Distinctive: line 269
If PR adds request handlers, verify correlation ID propagation exists.
- Distinctive: line 270
If PR logs user data, verify sensitive field redaction.
- Distinctive: line 271
If PR changes log levels, verify production volume impact assessed.
- Distinctive: line 275
If PR adds metrics, verify semantic convention compliance.
- Distinctive: line 276
If PR measures latency, verify histogram is used (not gauge/average).
- Distinctive: line 277
If PR adds counters, verify appropriate labels without high cardinality.
- Distinctive: line 278
If PR uses vendor SDK, verify OpenTelemetry abstraction considered.
- Distinctive: line 282
If PR crosses service boundaries, verify context propagation.
- Distinctive: line 283
If PR adds manual spans, verify naming follows conventions.
- Distinctive: line 284
If PR changes sampling, verify production volume considered.
- Distinctive: line 285
If PR adds span attributes, verify no sensitive data included.
- Distinctive: line 363
Add correlation ID middleware
- Distinctive: line 367
Add OpenTelemetry metrics SDK
- Distinctive: line 372
Add OpenTelemetry tracing SDK
- Distinctive: line 377
Add custom spans for business operations
- Distinctive: line 383
Use this checklist to verify observability is correctly configured:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Overview
Establish production-ready observability foundations using OpenTelemetry standards. Covers structured logging with message templates, RED/USE metrics, distributed tracing with W3C Trace Context, and correlation ID propagation across service boundaries.
When to Use
- Building any service requiring production-ready observability
- Establishing logging, metrics, and tracing patterns for new services
- Upgrading existing services from unstructured to structured observability
- Reviewing PRs that introduce or modify observability instrumentation
- Making architecture decisions involving monitoring and observability tooling
Core Workflow
- Configure structured logging with message templates (not string interpolation)
- Add correlation ID middleware to propagate request context
- Set up OpenTelemetry SDK for metrics and tracing
- Implement RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) for HTTP endpoints
- Enable W3C Trace Context propagation for distributed tracing
- Configure OTLP exporter for vendor-portable telemetry export
- Validate log output contains structured fields and correlation IDs
Core
When to use
- Any service requiring production-ready observability.
- New services establishing logging, metrics, and tracing patterns.
- Existing services upgrading from unstructured to structured observability.
- Any PR introducing or modifying observability instrumentation.
- Architecture decisions involving monitoring and observability tooling.
Defaults (strong preference)
- Use structured logging with message templates, not string interpolation.
- Prefer OpenTelemetry standards over vendor-specific SDKs.
- Implement RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) for HTTP endpoints.
- Enable W3C Trace Context propagation for distributed tracing.
- Configure correlation IDs for request tracing across components.
Three Pillars of Observability
| Pillar | Purpose | Standard |
| Logs | Discrete events with context | Structured JSON/text |
| Metrics | Aggregated numerical data | OpenTelemetry Metrics |
| Traces | Request flow across services | OpenTelemetry Tracing |
Rationale
- Structured logging enables searching, filtering, and alerting.
- OpenTelemetry provides vendor portability and industry standardisation.
- Correlation IDs enable distributed debugging across service boundaries.
- RED metrics provide consistent service health visibility.
- W3C Trace Context ensures interoperability across systems.
Review rules
- Reject string interpolation in log messages when structured templates are possible.
- Reject vendor-specific SDKs without OpenTelemetry abstraction layer.
- Reject custom metric naming when semantic conventions exist.
- Require correlation ID propagation for multi-component requests.
- Require log level justification for verbose production logging.
Load: structured-logging
Structured Logging Principles
Message Templates over String Interpolation:
// Correct: Message template with named placeholders
_logger.LogInformation("User {UserId} logged in from {IpAddress}", userId, ipAddress);
// Incorrect: String interpolation loses structure
_logger.LogInformation($"User {userId} logged in from {ipAddress}");Why structure matters:
- Enables log aggregation queries:
UserId = "12345" - Preserves type information for analysis
- Supports alerting on specific field values
- Reduces log storage through deduplication
Correlation ID Pattern
Every request should carry a correlation ID:
// Middleware to propagate correlation ID
public class CorrelationIdMiddleware
{
public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
{
var correlationId = context.Request.Headers["X-Correlation-ID"].FirstOrDefault()
?? Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
context.Items["CorrelationId"] = correlationId;
context.Response.Headers["X-Correlation-ID"] = correlationId;
using (_logger.BeginScope(new Dictionary<string, object>
{
["CorrelationId"] = correlationId
}))
{
await _next(context);
}
}
}Log Level Semantics
| Level | Use Case | Production Default |
| Trace | Detailed debugging (variable values) | OFF |
| Debug | Diagnostic information for developers | OFF |
| Information | Normal operation markers | ON |
| Warning | Unexpected but handled conditions | ON |
| Error | Failures requiring attention | ON |
| Critical | System-wide failures | ON |
Sensitive Data Handling
Never log:
- Passwords, API keys, or tokens
- Full credit card numbers
- Personal identification numbers
- Health or financial data (without explicit consent)
Redaction patterns:
// Mask sensitive fields
_logger.LogInformation("Payment processed for card ending {CardLast4}",
cardNumber.Substring(cardNumber.Length - 4));
// Use redaction attributes
[LogPropertyIgnore]
public string Password { get; set; }Load: metrics
RED Metrics (Golden Signals)
For every HTTP service, implement:
| Metric | Type | Description |
| Rate | Counter | Requests per second |
| Errors | Counter | Failed requests (4xx, 5xx) |
| Duration | Histogram | Request latency distribution |
USE Metrics (Resources)
For infrastructure resources:
| Metric | Type | Description |
| Utilisation | Gauge | Resource usage percentage |
| Saturation | Gauge | Queue depth, backlog |
| Errors | Counter | Resource-related failures |
OpenTelemetry Metrics Setup
builder.Services.AddOpenTelemetry()
.WithMetrics(metrics =>
{
metrics
.AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation()
.AddHttpClientInstrumentation()
.AddRuntimeInstrumentation()
.AddOtlpExporter();
});Metric Naming Conventions
Follow OpenTelemetry semantic conventions:
# Format: <namespace>.<metric_name>_<unit>
http.server.request.duration (histogram, seconds)
http.server.active_requests (gauge)
db.client.connections.usage (gauge)Avoid:
- Custom prefixes:
myapp_request_count - Inconsistent units:
latency_msvsduration_seconds - Vendor-specific names:
datadog.custom.metric
Load: tracing
Distributed Tracing Concepts
| Term | Definition |
| Trace | End-to-end request journey across services |
| Span | Single operation within a trace |
| Context | Trace ID + Span ID propagated across boundaries |
W3C Trace Context
Standard headers for context propagation:
traceparent: 00-0af7651916cd43dd8448eb211c80319c-b7ad6b7169203331-01
tracestate: vendor1=value1,vendor2=value2OpenTelemetry Tracing Setup
builder.Services.AddOpenTelemetry()
.WithTracing(tracing =>
{
tracing
.AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation()
.AddHttpClientInstrumentation()
.AddSqlClientInstrumentation()
.AddOtlpExporter();
});Span Naming Conventions
| Operation Type | Convention | Example |
| HTTP Server | {method} {route} | GET /api/users/{id} |
| HTTP Client | HTTP {method} | HTTP POST |
| Database | {db.system} {db.operation} | postgresql SELECT |
| Messaging | {destination} {operation} | orders.queue send |
Sampling Strategies
| Strategy | Use Case |
| Always On | Development, low-volume staging |
| Probability | Production (e.g., 10% of requests) |
| Rate Limiting | High-volume services (N traces/second) |
| Tail-Based | Keep traces with errors or high latency |
// Probability-based sampling
tracing.SetSampler(new TraceIdRatioBasedSampler(0.1)); // 10% samplingLoad: enforcement
Review Heuristic: Logging Changes
- If PR adds logging, verify message templates are used (not interpolation).
- If PR adds request handlers, verify correlation ID propagation exists.
- If PR logs user data, verify sensitive field redaction.
- If PR changes log levels, verify production volume impact assessed.
Review Heuristic: Metrics Changes
- If PR adds metrics, verify semantic convention compliance.
- If PR measures latency, verify histogram is used (not gauge/average).
- If PR adds counters, verify appropriate labels without high cardinality.
- If PR uses vendor SDK, verify OpenTelemetry abstraction considered.
Review Heuristic: Tracing Changes
- If PR crosses service boundaries, verify context propagation.
- If PR adds manual spans, verify naming follows conventions.
- If PR changes sampling, verify production volume considered.
- If PR adds span attributes, verify no sensitive data included.
Anti-Patterns to Reject
| Anti-Pattern | Why It's Problematic |
$"User {id}" | String interpolation loses structure |
Console.WriteLine | No structure, level, or enrichment |
| Vendor-specific SDK only | Creates lock-in, reduces portability |
| Logging PII directly | Compliance and security risk |
| Debug level in production | Volume costs and noise |
| Custom metric names | Breaks dashboard/alert portability |
| Missing correlation IDs | Distributed debugging impossible |
Load: advanced
Observability in Kubernetes
Container-friendly logging:
// JSON output for container log aggregation
builder.Host.UseSerilog((context, config) =>
{
config
.WriteTo.Console(new JsonFormatter())
.Enrich.WithProperty("ServiceName", "my-api");
});Resource attributes for K8s:
.ConfigureResource(resource =>
{
resource
.AddService("my-api")
.AddAttributes(new Dictionary<string, object>
{
["k8s.namespace.name"] = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("K8S_NAMESPACE"),
["k8s.pod.name"] = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("K8S_POD_NAME")
});
});Exporter Configuration
OTLP (recommended for portability):
.AddOtlpExporter(options =>
{
options.Endpoint = new Uri("http://otel-collector:4317");
options.Protocol = OtlpExportProtocol.Grpc;
});Direct vendor export (when needed):
// Jaeger, Zipkin, or vendor-specific exporters
// Only use when OTLP collector is not available
.AddJaegerExporter()Cost and Performance Considerations
| Concern | Mitigation |
| Log volume | Appropriate log levels, sampling |
| Metric cardinality | Limit label values, avoid high-cardinality |
| Trace storage | Sampling strategies, retention policies |
| Network overhead | Batching, compression, local collectors |
Incremental Adoption Path
- Phase 1: Structured Logging
- Convert string interpolation to message templates
- Add correlation ID middleware
- Configure JSON output for aggregation
- Phase 2: Metrics
- Add OpenTelemetry metrics SDK
- Implement RED metrics for HTTP endpoints
- Configure OTLP exporter
- Phase 3: Tracing
- Add OpenTelemetry tracing SDK
- Enable automatic instrumentation
- Configure sampling for production
- Phase 4: Refinement
- Add custom spans for business operations
- Tune sampling strategies
- Establish alerting on key signals
Minimal Validation Checklist
Use this checklist to verify observability is correctly configured:
Structured Logging Validation
- Log entry contains structured fields (not just message string)
- Correlation ID present in all request-scoped logs
- Log level appropriate for message type
- No PII or sensitive data in logs
Sample log entry to verify:
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:45.123Z",
"level": "Information",
"message": "User logged in successfully",
"properties": {
"UserId": "usr_12345",
"IpAddress": "192.168.1.100",
"CorrelationId": "abc-123-def-456",
"ServiceName": "auth-api"
}
}Validation command:
# Check log output format
curl -s http://localhost:5000/api/health | jq .
# Then check application logs for structured output
# Verify correlation ID propagation
curl -H "X-Correlation-ID: test-123" http://localhost:5000/api/users/1
# Check logs contain "CorrelationId": "test-123"Metrics Validation
- RED metrics exposed for HTTP endpoints
- Metric names follow semantic conventions
- Labels have bounded cardinality
- Metrics endpoint accessible
Sample metric names to verify:
http_server_request_duration_seconds_bucket{method="GET",route="/api/users/{id}",status="200",le="0.1"}
http_server_request_duration_seconds_count{method="GET",route="/api/users/{id}",status="200"}
http_server_active_requests{method="GET"}Validation command:
# Check metrics endpoint
curl -s http://localhost:5000/metrics | grep http_server
# Verify histogram buckets exist
curl -s http://localhost:5000/metrics | grep "_bucket"
# Check for high-cardinality labels (should NOT see user IDs, request IDs, etc.)
curl -s http://localhost:5000/metrics | grep -E "user_id|request_id"
# Should return nothingTrace Propagation Validation
- W3C traceparent header propagated
- Spans created for HTTP requests
- Database operations create child spans
- Cross-service traces connected
Sample trace header:
traceparent: 00-0af7651916cd43dd8448eb211c80319c-b7ad6b7169203331-01
tracestate: myvendor=valueValidation command:
# Verify trace context propagation
# Make request with traceparent header
curl -H "traceparent: 00-12345678901234567890123456789012-1234567890123456-01" \
-v http://localhost:5000/api/users/1 2>&1 | grep -i traceparent
# Check response includes traceparent
# Verify downstream services receive same trace ID
# Check OTLP exporter connectivity
curl -s http://localhost:4317/health # gRPC health check
curl -s http://localhost:4318/health # HTTP health checkQuick Validation Script
#!/bin/bash
# validate-observability.sh
SERVICE_URL="${1:-http://localhost:5000}"
ERRORS=0
echo "=== Observability Validation ==="
echo "Service: $SERVICE_URL"
echo ""
# Test 1: Metrics endpoint
echo "1. Checking metrics endpoint..."
if curl -sf "$SERVICE_URL/metrics" > /dev/null; then
echo " ✓ Metrics endpoint accessible"
# Check for RED metrics
if curl -sf "$SERVICE_URL/metrics" | grep -q "http_server_request_duration"; then
echo " ✓ Duration metric present"
else
echo " ✗ Duration metric missing"
((ERRORS++))
fi
else
echo " ✗ Metrics endpoint not accessible"
((ERRORS++))
fi
# Test 2: Correlation ID propagation
echo ""
echo "2. Checking correlation ID propagation..."
CORRELATION_ID="test-$(date +%s)"
RESPONSE=$(curl -sf -H "X-Correlation-ID: $CORRELATION_ID" "$SERVICE_URL/api/health" -i 2>&1)
if echo "$RESPONSE" | grep -qi "x-correlation-id"; then
echo " ✓ Correlation ID returned in response"
else
echo " ✗ Correlation ID not propagated"
((ERRORS++))
fi
# Test 3: Trace context
echo ""
echo "3. Checking trace context propagation..."
TRACE_ID="12345678901234567890123456789012"
RESPONSE=$(curl -sf -H "traceparent: 00-$TRACE_ID-1234567890123456-01" \
"$SERVICE_URL/api/health" -i 2>&1)
if echo "$RESPONSE" | grep -qi "traceparent"; then
echo " ✓ Trace context propagated"
else
echo " ⚠ Trace context not in response headers (may be logged internally)"
fi
# Summary
echo ""
echo "=== Summary ==="
if [ $ERRORS -eq 0 ]; then
echo "✓ All validations passed"
exit 0
else
echo "✗ $ERRORS validation(s) failed"
exit 1
fiEvidence Template
# Observability Validation Evidence
**Service**: [service-name]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Validator**: [name]
## Logging
- [x] Structured logging configured
- [x] Correlation ID middleware active
- [x] Log level: Information (production)
**Sample log entry:**
[paste actual log entry here]
## Metrics
- [x] Metrics endpoint: /metrics
- [x] RED metrics present
- [x] No high-cardinality labels
**Metrics output:**
```text
[paste relevant metrics here]
```
## Tracing
- [x] OpenTelemetry SDK configured
- [x] W3C Trace Context propagation
- [x] Sampling: 10% (production)
**Trace verification:**
[paste trace ID and verification steps]Red Flags - STOP
These statements indicate observability anti-patterns:
| Thought | Reality |
| "String interpolation is fine for logs" | Structured templates enable searching and alerting |
| "Console.WriteLine works for now" | Use proper logging with levels and enrichment |
| "Vendor SDK is easier" | OpenTelemetry provides portability; avoid lock-in |
| "Correlation IDs add complexity" | IDs are essential for distributed debugging |
| "Log everything at Info level" | Appropriate levels prevent noise and reduce costs |
| "Custom metric names are clearer" | Semantic conventions enable dashboard portability |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

