agentleFS
maroffomaroffo/claude-forge/skills/skill-forge/SKILL.md

skill-forge

Skill17 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create new skills or review and improve existing ones. Use when user says create skill, new skill, improve skill, review skill, audit skills, or skill quality.

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use sigma, agent-forge and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • sanyuan0704Skill

    sigma

    Personalized 1-on-1 AI tutor using Bloom's 2-Sigma mastery learning. Guides users through any topic with Socratic questioning, adaptive pacing, and rich visual output (HTML dashboards, Excalidraw concept maps, generated images). Use when user wants to learn something, study a topic, understand a concept, requests tutoring, says 'teach me', 'I want to learn', 'explain X to me step by step', 'help me understand', or invokes /sigma. Triggers on: learn, study, teach, tutor, understand, master, explain step by step.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • xyreinsurance119Skill

    agent-forge

    Создание, улучшение и аудит скиллов и агентов OpenClaw. Три режима: создание скилла (11 шагов), создание агента (9 шагов, с памятью и автоулучшением), улучшение существующего (5 шагов). Triggers: 'создай скилл', 'новый скилл', 'создай агента', 'новый агент', 'улучши скилл', 'skill creator', 'agent creator', 'скиллмейкер'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • localSummerSkill

    skill-review

    回顾当前对话,整理 skill 使用情况、代码质量反馈和迭代建议,生成待确认的更新清单

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    deep-research

    Queue deep, multi-step research and analysis tasks to the DeepAgents worker. Supports execution depth presets, request-specific rubrics, SubAgent delegation, and RubricMiddleware cross-validation.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    code-review

    Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create new skills or audit/improve existing ones.

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Gather context: ask what the skill does, when to use it, what tools it needs

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Test: Ask yourself "When would you use the [name] skill?" If the description doesn't answer clearly, it needs work.

    line 84
  4. Distinctive:

    Start at 100, subtract per finding:

    line 109
  5. Very specific:

    Token budget: every word in SKILL.md costs context on every trigger.

    line 131
  6. Distinctive:

    No em dashes: use commas, colons, semicolons, or parentheses

    line 132

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ABOUTME: Skill creation and improvement based on Anthropic's skills guide

ABOUTME: Validates structure, descriptions, triggers, progressive disclosure, and conventions

Skill Forge

Create new skills or audit/improve existing ones. Encodes Anthropic's official guide + our conventions.

Modes

Create: /skill-forge create <name>

  1. Gather context: ask what the skill does, when to use it, what tools it needs
  2. Generate SKILL.md following the template below
  3. Validate against the checklist
  4. Present for approval before writing

Review: /skill-forge review <name> or /skill-forge review all

  1. Read the skill's SKILL.md
  2. Score against the checklist (0-100)
  3. Report findings grouped by severity (critical, major, minor)
  4. Propose fixes as diffs

Skill Template

---
name: kebab-case-name
description: "[What it does]. Use when [trigger conditions]. [Key capabilities]. Not for [negative triggers if overlapping skills exist]."
compatibility: "Only if external deps needed"
---

# ABOUTME: [One-line what]
# ABOUTME: [One-line key capabilities]

# Skill Title

## [Core Instructions]

[Outcomes, constraints with their reasons, and how to verify the result. Numbered steps only where order truly matters; exact commands only for fragile operations.]

## Common Issues

| Issue | Solution |
|-------|----------|

## References (if >150 lines needed)

For detailed patterns, consult `references/<topic>.md`

Validation Checklist

Structure (critical)

CheckRule
Folder namekebab-case, no spaces/capitals/underscores
File nameExactly SKILL.md (case-sensitive)
Frontmatter--- delimiters, name + description required
ABOUTMETwo lines after frontmatter: what + capabilities
No README.mdAll docs in SKILL.md or references/

Description (critical)

CheckRule
Formula[What] + [When/triggers] + [Capabilities]
Trigger phrasesInclude words users actually say
Negative triggers"Not for X" if overlapping skills exist
LengthUnder 1024 characters
No XML tagsNo < or > in description
QuotesWrapped in double quotes

Test: Ask yourself "When would you use the [name] skill?" If the description doesn't answer clearly, it needs work.

Content (major)

CheckRule
Specificity matches fragilityExact commands for fragile or destructive operations; outcomes, constraints and reasons for judgment calls
ExamplesOnly where the output shape is format-sensitive: several varied examples, labeled illustrative; none for judgment the model already owns
Error handlingCommon issues table for workflow skills
Progressive disclosureSKILL.md <150 lines core; detailed content in references/
RegisterInstructions at normal volume with the reason attached; no anti-laziness notes or capitalized emphasis, which current models over-apply

Optional Fields (minor)

FieldWhen to use
compatibilityExternal deps (app, CLI, API key, MCP server)
allowed-toolsRestrict to specific tools
toolsSimpler tool restriction
metadataDistribution (author, version, mcp-server)

Scoring

Start at 100, subtract per finding:

SeverityDeductionExamples
Critical-25No frontmatter, no description, wrong file name
Major-10No trigger phrases, vague instructions, no ABOUTME
Minor-3Missing compatibility, no error handling, a single unlabeled gold example
ScoreVerdict
90+Ship it
70-89Needs fixes
<70Rewrite

Our Conventions (beyond Anthropic's guide)

  • ABOUTME headers: 2-line comment block after frontmatter (what + capabilities)
  • Cross-references: link to _AST_GREP.md, _PATTERNS.md, source-control where relevant
  • _INDEX.md: register new skills in the routing table
  • CLAUDE.md: nothing to add. The harness injects every skill's name and description, so the file carries no skill catalog; discovery lives in your description: field, which is why it must state when to use the skill and when not to
  • Token budget: every word in SKILL.md costs context on every trigger; cut what the model already knows, keep what only the author knows (reasons, environment facts, quality bar)
  • No em dashes: use commas, colons, semicolons, or parentheses

Quality Notes

  • Compare against existing high-quality skills (rails, source-control)
  • Propose concrete diffs, not vague suggestions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.