create_plan
Skill38 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create New Plan
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bokiko/continuous-claude-guidetheir own version, first seen Feb 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- bokiko/continuous-claude-guide★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository101 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/autonomous_execution.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_editing.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_sync.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_sync_requirement.mdcCursor rule
- site_pages/llms.txtllms.txt
- advisorySkill
- analyzeSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- create-planSkill
- create-prototypeSkill
- create_prototypeSkill
- create_prSkill
- create-releaseSkill
- create_releaseSkill
- create-ruleSkill
- create_ruleSkill
- debugSkill
- draft-illustrationSkill
- draft_illustrationSkill
- endSkill
- evaluate_positioningSkill
- final-reviewSkill
- final_reviewSkill
- fix-feature-bugSkill
- fix_feature_bugSkill
- learnSkill
- manage-error-debuggingSkill
- manage_error_debuggingSkill
- neversight_learn_skills.dev_obviously_awesomeSkill
- process_issuesSkill
- process_prsSkill
- publish-planSkill
- publish_planSkill
- publishSkill
- pullSkill
- pushSkill
- recover_sqlite_databaseSkill
- releaseSkill
- report-errorSkill
- report_errorSkill
- reportSkill
- reviewSkill
- run-feature-workflowSkill
- run_feature_workflowSkill
- setup-commandsSkill
- setup_commandsSkill
- setup-cursor-copiesSkill
- setup_cursor_copiesSkill
- store-neotomaSkill
- store_neotomaSkill
- sync-env-from-1passwordSkill
- sync_env_from_1passwordSkill
- analyzeSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- create-planSkill
- create-prototypeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Create a new plan entity in Neotoma with title = {{input:title}}.
- Very specific: line 13
Follow the complete workflow in foundation/development/plan_workflow.md.
- Distinctive: line 22
Run alignment check (summary → user confirms)
- Distinctive: line 24
Create relationships to related entities
- Distinctive: line 31
Ask the user for any missing required fields:
- Distinctive: line 50
After collecting fields, produce a concise summary:
- Distinctive: line 55
Ask: "Does this accurately capture what you want this plan to do?"
- Very specific: line 61
Use store or submit_entity with:
- Distinctive: line 63
All collected fields as snapshot fields
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not wait for a response before completing this skill.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Source: .cursor/skills/create-plan/SKILL.md -->Create New Plan
Create a new plan entity in Neotoma with title = {{input:title}}.
Follow the complete workflow in foundation/development/plan_workflow.md. Configuration is read from foundation-config.yaml.
This workflow can also be triggered automatically via .claude/rules/plan_detection.mdc when you mention planning-related patterns in natural language (e.g., "create plan", "new plan"). Both paths execute the same workflow.
Workflow Overview
Implements Checkpoint 0 of the plan creation workflow:
- Collect required plan fields from the user
- Run alignment check (summary → user confirms)
- Store plan as a Neotoma
planentity - Create relationships to related entities
- Optionally rebuild the
neotoma-plansmirror
Tasks
Collect required fields:
Ask the user for any missing required fields:
title— Short, imperative namedescription— Problem being solved and why it mattersscope— What is explicitly in scopeout_of_scope— What is explicitly out of scopesuccess_criteria— Measurable conditions for completionstatus— Default todraft
Optional fields to offer (collect if relevant):
priority(P0/P1/P2/P3)phasetarget_releasedeliverablesdependencies(canonical names of plans this plan requires)testing_notesobservability_notes
Alignment check:
After collecting fields, produce a concise summary:
- Problem it solves and why it exists
- What is explicitly in scope and out of scope
- Critical constraints or invariants
Ask: "Does this accurately capture what you want this plan to do?"
Incorporate corrections and re-summarize if changes are substantial. Do not proceed until the user confirms.
Store the plan:
Use
storeorsubmit_entitywith:entity_type: plan- All collected fields as snapshot fields
- Create relationships (if relevant entities are mentioned or known):
REFERS_TOfor objectives, releases, or parent plansDEPENDS_ONfor plans this plan requiresINFORMED_BYfor issues, feedback, or research
Confirm and offer mirror rebuild:
Plan stored: {canonical_name} To refresh plans/ in the repo, run: neotoma mirror rebuild --profile neotoma-plansDo not wait for a response before completing this skill.
Required Documents
Load before starting:
foundation/development/plan_workflow.md(workflow)foundation-config.yaml(configuration)
Inputs
title(string): Short plan name, e.g. "Add selective mirror profiles"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

