create-release
Skill38 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create New Release
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- patniko/whimtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- richkuo/rk-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- microsoft/BC-Benchtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Azure/azure-service-operatortheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- epam/ketchertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- irpsv/ai-brotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-issue, create-pr and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
sahinSkillcreate-issue
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillcreate-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
Also in 5 projects that use this
DockerSkillreview-pr
Review one or more incoming Docker documentation pull requests as a maintainer. Independently validate technical claims, assess editorial fit and information architecture, choose a verdict, and draft exact inline or PR-wide feedback behind a confirmation gate. Use for requests such as "review PR 123", "is this PR correct?", "does this information belong here?", "validate this PR", or "help review backlog PRs". Do not use to maintain or fix a PR you own; use maintain-pr for that.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- Saptha-me/Bindu★ 10ksame name
- GetBindu/Bindu★ 10ksame name
- IndrajeetPatil/ggstatsplot★ 2.2ksame name
- mlightcad/cad-viewer★ 1.2ksame name
- epam/ketcher★ 932same name
- Azure/azure-service-operator★ 916same name
- fpindej/netrock★ 234same name
- microsoft/BC-Bench★ 61same name
- glowingkitty/OpenMates★ 53same name
- richkuo/rk-skills★ 50same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository101 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/autonomous_execution.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_editing.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_sync.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules_sync_requirement.mdcCursor rule
- site_pages/llms.txtllms.txt
- advisorySkill
- analyzeSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- create-planSkill
- create_planSkill
- create-prototypeSkill
- create_prototypeSkill
- create_prSkill
- create_releaseSkill
- create-ruleSkill
- create_ruleSkill
- debugSkill
- draft-illustrationSkill
- draft_illustrationSkill
- endSkill
- evaluate_positioningSkill
- final-reviewSkill
- final_reviewSkill
- fix-feature-bugSkill
- fix_feature_bugSkill
- learnSkill
- manage-error-debuggingSkill
- manage_error_debuggingSkill
- neversight_learn_skills.dev_obviously_awesomeSkill
- process_issuesSkill
- process_prsSkill
- publish-planSkill
- publish_planSkill
- publishSkill
- pullSkill
- pushSkill
- recover_sqlite_databaseSkill
- releaseSkill
- report-errorSkill
- report_errorSkill
- reportSkill
- reviewSkill
- run-feature-workflowSkill
- run_feature_workflowSkill
- setup-commandsSkill
- setup_commandsSkill
- setup-cursor-copiesSkill
- setup_cursor_copiesSkill
- store-neotomaSkill
- store_neotomaSkill
- sync-env-from-1passwordSkill
- sync_env_from_1passwordSkill
- analyzeSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- create-planSkill
- create-prototypeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
38 rules. 0 are common, 27 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
27
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Explicit Command: Use when you know exactly what you want: start a new release, plan multi-FU work with dependency resolution, generate …
- Distinctive: line 49
Check if Release plan exists:
- Distinctive: line 85
Do not wait for a response before proceeding to Step 3.
- Distinctive: line 94
Detect cycles: If cycle found → REJECT with error message.
- Distinctive: line 95
Validate dependencies: If any required FU is ⏳ Not Started and not in this Release → REJECT.
- Very specific: line 136
Add these to integration_tests.md with explicit pass/fail conditions
- Very specific: line 144
Update Release status to in_progress
- Distinctive: line 156
Before starting execution, prompt user for execution strategy:
- Distinctive: line 159
If single-agent selected, orchestrator recommends model based on release complexity
- Distinctive: line 169
Check if FU spec exists
- Very specific: line 170
If not, run Create New Feature Unit command (Checkpoint 0)
- Very specific: line 171
If UI FU and no prototype, run Create Prototype command
- Distinctive: line 172
If UI FU and prototype not approved, run Checkpoint 1 (Prototype Review)
- Very specific: line 173
Run Run Feature Workflow command to implement FU
- Very specific: line 174
Run Final Review command (Checkpoint 2) for FU approval
- Distinctive: line 175
If multiple FUs in batch, suggest running in parallel (separate agent sessions or worktrees)
- Distinctive: line 182
Test flows that span multiple FUs in this batch
- Distinctive: line 183
If tests fail: STOP and report failures to user.
- Distinctive: line 184
If tests pass, proceed
- Very specific: line 188
Update progress percentage: (completed_batches / total_batches) * 100
- Very specific: line 189
If any decisions were made during batch execution (scope changes, FU deferrals, etc.), append to Decision Log in status.md with timestamp
- Very specific: line 200
Check if mid-release checkpoint is configured: Look for checkpoint_1_after_batch in manifest.yaml.
- Distinctive: line 202
If configured and batch threshold reached, present mid-release status:
- Distinctive: line 224
Run full integration test suite:
- Distinctive: line 232
Check Release-level acceptance criteria:
- Distinctive: line 247
If tests fail: STOP and report failures to user.
- Distinctive: line 294
Run database migrations (if any)
- Distinctive: line 304
If deployment fails: STOP and report failure, execute rollback plan, user investigates and fixes.
- Very specific: line 306
If deployment succeeds: Update Release status to deployed, record deployment timestamp, proceed to Step 9.
- Distinctive: line 313
Check that key metrics from acceptance criteria are being collected
- Distinctive: line 314
Verify dashboards are accessible
- Distinctive: line 318
Add links to dashboards, alerts to Release status doc
- Very specific: line 322
Update status to completed
- Distinctive: line 439
Do NOT proceed past Checkpoint 0 without complete Release plan
- Distinctive: line 440
Always validate FU dependencies before generating schedule
- Distinctive: line 442
Always run cross-FU integration tests after each batch
- Distinctive: line 443
Always get user approval at Checkpoints 0, 1 (if configured), 2
- Distinctive: line 444
Do NOT deploy without passing integration tests and acceptance criteria
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Source: foundation/.cursor/skills/create-release/SKILL.md -->name: create-release description: Create a new software release with planning, manifest, and execution schedule. triggers:
- new release
- create release
- plan release
- create-release
- /create-release
Create New Release
Orchestrates multiple Feature Units into a cohesive release. Implements the Release workflow from foundation/development/release_workflow.md.
When to Use
Explicit Command: Use when you know exactly what you want: start a new release, plan multi-FU work with dependency resolution, generate execution schedules with parallelization, orchestrate FU creation/execution in dependency order, run cross-FU integration tests.
Automatic Detection: This workflow can also be triggered automatically via .claude/rules/release_detection.md when you mention release-related patterns in natural language (e.g., "new release", "release v1.1.0"). Both paths execute the same workflow.
This is a foundation command. If installed, it will be available in .claude/skills/ via symlink.
Prerequisites
- Release ID chosen (format:
vX.Y.Z, e.g.,v1.0.0) - Release scope roughly defined (what's in, what's out)
- FU IDs for included work identified (or to be created)
Command Execution
Step 1: Load Documentation
Load required documents:
foundation/development/release_workflow.md(primary workflow)docs/feature_units/standards/creating_feature_units.md(FU creation)docs/feature_units/standards/execution_instructions.md(FU execution)docs/feature_units/completed/anddocs/feature_units/in_progress/(for Feature Unit specs)
Step 2: Checkpoint 0 — Release Planning
Check if Release plan exists:
- Look for
docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id}/release_plan.md - Look for
docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id}/manifest.yaml
If Release plan exists: Load and validate. If complete → proceed to Step 3. If incomplete → prompt user to complete.
If Release plan does NOT exist: Prompt user interactively for Release details:
- Release name and version (e.g., "MVP", "v1.0.0")
- Release goal (1-2 sentence summary of what this ships)
- Target ship date (date or "when ready")
- Priority (P0 critical / P1 high / P2 normal)
- Included Feature Units (list of FU IDs, e.g., "FU-100, FU-101, FU-102")
- Excluded scope (what's explicitly NOT in this release)
- Release-level acceptance criteria:
- Product acceptance (core workflows, empty/error states)
- Technical acceptance (test coverage, performance, integrity)
- Business acceptance (metrics, KPIs)
- Cross-FU integration test requirements (flows that span multiple FUs)
- Deployment strategy (staging_first / canary / full_rollout)
- Rollback plan (how to revert if issues found)
- Post-release monitoring plan (key metrics, alerts)
After user input: Generate complete Release plan (release_plan.md), create manifest YAML (manifest.yaml), create integration test spec (integration_tests.md), create status tracker (status.md), save all to docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id}/.
After saving the release plan, offer the publish-plan prompt once:
Release plan saved to docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id}/release_plan.md.
Would you like to share this as a GitHub Discussion for pre-execution
input? Run /publish-plan docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id}/release_plan.md
to generate a public-facing post.Do not wait for a response before proceeding to Step 3.
Step 3: Dependency Analysis and Schedule Generation
Analyze dependencies:
- Load all FU manifests for FUs in Release
- Extract dependencies from each FU's
dependencies.requiresfield - Build dependency graph: FU → [list of required FUs]
- Detect cycles: If cycle found → REJECT with error message. List cycle: "FU-A → FU-B → FU-C → FU-A"
- Validate dependencies: If any required FU is ⏳ Not Started and not in this Release → REJECT. If any required FU is 🔨 Partial → WARN but allow with user confirmation. If any required FU is ✅ Complete → proceed.
Generate execution schedule:
- Perform topological sort of FU dependency graph
- Group into batches:
- Batch 0: FUs with no dependencies
- Batch 1: FUs that depend only on Batch 0
- Batch 2: FUs that depend only on Batch 0 or 1
- ... continue until all FUs assigned to batches
- Identify parallelization opportunities:
- Within each batch, FUs can execute in parallel
- Estimate timeline:
- Sum FU effort estimates per batch
- Account for parallelization (divide by number of parallel agents if applicable)
- Save execution schedule to
execution_schedule.md
Pre-Mortem Analysis:
- Identify top 3-5 most likely failure modes for this Release
- For each failure mode, specify:
- Early warning signals (metrics, test failures, timeline slips)
- Mitigating FUs or actions
- Rollback plan
- Present pre-mortem to user and ask:
- "Do these failure modes match your concerns? (yes/no)"
- "What other failure modes should we plan for?"
- Incorporate feedback and add "Pre-Mortem" section to Release plan
WIP and Parallelization Limits:
- Encode limits in
manifest.yaml:max_parallel_fus: <number>(default: 3)max_high_risk_in_parallel: <number>(default: 1)
- Present limits to user: "Proposed limits: max_parallel_fus=3, max_high_risk_in_parallel=1. Approve? (yes/modify)"
Machine-Checkable Exit Criteria:
- For each Release acceptance criterion, define:
- Concrete test suite or script that validates it
- Single metric or query that proves it
- Add these to
integration_tests.mdwith explicit pass/fail conditions - Present to user: "Each acceptance criterion now has a machine-checkable test. Review? (yes/modify)"
Present schedule to user: Display batch breakdown, show which FUs run in parallel, show estimated timeline, show WIP limits and pre-mortem failure modes. STOP and prompt: "Approve execution schedule? (yes/no/modify)"
If user approves:
- Initialize
status.mdwith "Decision Log" section (empty initially) - Update Release status to
in_progress - Proceed to Step 4
If user requests modifications:
- Adjust schedule based on user input
- Re-present for approval
Step 4: Execute FU Batches (Autonomous)
Before starting execution, prompt user for execution strategy:
- Run
node scripts/release_orchestrator.js <release_id> - Orchestrator will prompt: "How would you like to execute this release build? 1. Single-agent (sequential execution) 2. Multi-agent (parallel execution)"
- If single-agent selected, orchestrator recommends model based on release complexity
- Selected strategy saved to
manifest.yaml
For each batch in execution schedule (in order):
Batch Execution Loop:
Start all FUs in batch:
- For each FU in batch:
- Check if FU spec exists
- If not, run
Create New Feature Unitcommand (Checkpoint 0) - If UI FU and no prototype, run
Create Prototypecommand - If UI FU and prototype not approved, run Checkpoint 1 (Prototype Review)
- Run
Run Feature Workflowcommand to implement FU - Run
Final Reviewcommand (Checkpoint 2) for FU approval
- If multiple FUs in batch, suggest running in parallel (separate agent sessions or worktrees)
- For each FU in batch:
- Wait for all FUs in batch to complete
Run cross-FU integration tests:
- Execute integration test suite from
integration_tests.md - Test flows that span multiple FUs in this batch
- If tests fail: STOP and report failures to user. User decides: fix and retry, skip FU, or abort Release
- If tests pass, proceed
- Execute integration test suite from
- Update Release status:
- Mark batch as
completedinstatus.md - Update progress percentage:
(completed_batches / total_batches) * 100 - If any decisions were made during batch execution (scope changes, FU deferrals, etc.), append to Decision Log in
status.mdwith timestamp
- Mark batch as
After all batches complete:
- Mark all FUs as
completedin status tracker - Proceed to Step 5
Step 5: Checkpoint 1 — Mid-Release Review (Optional)
Check if mid-release checkpoint is configured: Look for checkpoint_1_after_batch in manifest.yaml. If not configured, skip to Step 6.
If configured and batch threshold reached, present mid-release status:
- "Mid-release checkpoint reached"
- "FUs completed: X/Y"
- "Integration tests: [pass/fail summary]"
- "Current batch: N"
- "Remaining batches: [list]"
STOP and prompt user:
- "Continue to remaining FUs? (yes/no/pause)"
If user responds:
- yes → continue to remaining batches
- no → halt execution, mark Release as
paused - pause → halt execution, user can resume later
Step 6: Cross-Release Integration Testing
Run full integration test suite:
- Execute all tests from
integration_tests.md - Run end-to-end user flows that span multiple FUs
- Verify no regressions in existing functionality
- Run performance benchmarks (if specified in acceptance criteria)
- Verify graph integrity (0 orphans, 0 cycles if applicable)
Check Release-level acceptance criteria:
- Product acceptance: Core workflows functional?
- Technical acceptance: Test coverage met? Performance targets hit?
- Business acceptance: Metrics instrumented? Analytics ready?
Generate integration test report:
- Save to
integration_test_report.md - Include:
- Pass/fail summary
- Performance metrics
- Regression test results
- Issues found (if any)
If tests fail: STOP and report failures to user. User decides: fix issues and re-test, or abort Release.
If all tests pass: Proceed to Step 7.
Step 7: Checkpoint 2 — Pre-Release Sign-Off
Present Release summary:
- FUs completed: X/Y (with list)
- Integration tests: [pass/fail summary with link to report]
- Acceptance criteria: [checklist with ✅ / ❌ status]
- Release plan: [link]
- Integration test report: [link]
STOP and prompt user:
- "Release {release_id} ready for deployment."
- "All FUs complete: [list with status]"
- "Integration tests passed: [summary]"
- "Acceptance criteria met: [checklist]"
- "Approve for deployment? (yes/no)"
- "Any final changes needed? (list or 'none')"
If user requests changes:
- Apply changes
- Re-run affected tests
- Update status
- Repeat Checkpoint 2 until approved
If user approves:
- Update Release status to
ready_for_deployment - Proceed to Step 8
Step 8: Deployment
Execute deployment plan:
- Follow deployment strategy from Release plan:
- staging_first: Deploy to staging, run smoke tests, then production
- canary: Deploy to small % of users, monitor, then full rollout
- full_rollout: Deploy to all users at once
- Run deployment steps:
- Build production bundle
- Run database migrations (if any)
- Deploy backend services
- Deploy frontend assets
- Run health checks
- Run smoke tests
- Verify deployment success:
- Health checks pass?
- Smoke tests pass?
- Key metrics normal?
If deployment fails: STOP and report failure, execute rollback plan, user investigates and fixes.
If deployment succeeds: Update Release status to deployed, record deployment timestamp, proceed to Step 9.
Step 9: Post-Release Monitoring Setup
Setup monitoring:
- Verify metrics instrumentation:
- Check that key metrics from acceptance criteria are being collected
- Verify dashboards are accessible
- Setup alerts:
- Configure alerts for critical metrics (error rates, latency, etc.)
- Document monitoring links:
- Add links to dashboards, alerts to Release status doc
Mark Release as completed:
- Update status to
completed - Move Release files from
in_progress/tocompleted/:mv docs/releases/in_progress/{release_id} docs/releases/completed/{release_id}
Present completion summary:
- "Release {release_id} deployed and complete!"
- "Deployed at: {timestamp}"
- "Monitoring: {dashboard_links}"
- "FUs shipped: [list]"
Example Interaction
User: Create release v1.0.0 for MVP
Agent: Loading Release workflow documentation...
Agent: No existing Release plan found for v1.0.0. Starting interactive Release planning (Checkpoint 0).
Agent: What is the Release name and version?
User: MVP, v1.0.0
Agent: What is the Release goal? (1-2 sentence summary)
User: Ship deterministic Truth Layer with ingestion, extraction, entity resolution, timeline, and MCP access for AI tools. Support multi-user teams.
Agent: What is the target ship date?
User: 2025-03-01
Agent: What is the priority?
User: P0 critical
Agent: Which Feature Units should be included? (list FU IDs)
User: FU-100, FU-101, FU-102, FU-103, FU-105, FU-300, FU-700, FU-701
Agent: [loads the matching Feature Unit specs from `docs/feature_units/`]
Agent: What scope is explicitly excluded from this release?
User: Semantic search, Plaid integration, X/Instagram integrations (all post-MVP)
Agent: What are the Release-level acceptance criteria? (product, technical, business)
User: [provides release-specific criteria]
Agent: What cross-FU integration tests are required?
User: Full user flow: upload → extraction → entity resolution → event generation → timeline display → AI query via MCP
Agent: What is the deployment strategy?
User: staging_first
Agent: What is the rollback plan?
User: Revert to previous release tag, restore DB snapshot if needed
Agent: What monitoring plan should be setup post-release?
User: Monitor upload success rate, P95 latency, DAU, orphan node count
Agent: Generating Release plan, manifest, and integration test spec...
Agent: Analyzing FU dependencies...
Agent: Dependency graph:
FU-100 → []
FU-101 → [FU-100]
FU-102 → [FU-100]
FU-103 → [FU-101, FU-102]
FU-105 → [FU-103]
FU-300 → []
FU-700 → []
FU-701 → [FU-700]
Agent: Generating execution schedule...
Agent: Execution schedule:
Batch 0: FU-100, FU-300, FU-700 (can run in parallel)
Batch 1: FU-101, FU-102 (can run in parallel, depend on FU-100)
Batch 2: FU-103 (depends on FU-101, FU-102)
Batch 3: FU-105, FU-701 (can run in parallel, FU-105 depends on FU-103, FU-701 depends on FU-700)
Agent: Estimated timeline: 11-14 days (with parallelization across 3 agents)
Agent: Approve execution schedule? (yes/no/modify)
User: yes
Agent: Starting batch execution...
Agent: Batch 0: Starting FU-100, FU-300, FU-700 in parallel...
[FU execution proceeds autonomously]
Agent: Batch 0 complete. Running cross-FU integration tests...
Agent: Integration tests passed.
Agent: Batch 1: Starting FU-101, FU-102 in parallel...
[continues through all batches]
Agent: All batches complete. Running full integration test suite...
Agent: All integration tests passed.
Agent: Release v1.0.0 ready for deployment.
Agent: All FUs complete: FU-100 ✅, FU-101 ✅, FU-102 ✅, FU-103 ✅, FU-105 ✅, FU-300 ✅, FU-700 ✅, FU-701 ✅
Agent: Integration tests passed: 12/12
Agent: Acceptance criteria met: ✅ Product, ✅ Technical, ✅ Business
Agent: Approve for deployment? (yes/no)
User: yes
Agent: Deploying to staging...
Agent: Staging smoke tests passed.
Agent: Deploying to production...
Agent: Production health checks passed.
Agent: Release v1.0.0 deployed and complete!
Agent: Monitoring: [dashboard links]Agent Instructions
Load Order
foundation/development/release_workflow.md(primary)docs/feature_units/standards/creating_feature_units.md(for FU creation)docs/feature_units/standards/execution_instructions.md(for FU execution)docs/feature_units/completed/anddocs/feature_units/in_progress/(for Feature Unit specs)
Constraints
- Do NOT proceed past Checkpoint 0 without complete Release plan
- Always validate FU dependencies before generating schedule
- REJECT if circular dependencies detected
- Always run cross-FU integration tests after each batch
- Always get user approval at Checkpoints 0, 1 (if configured), 2
- Do NOT deploy without passing integration tests and acceptance criteria
Forbidden Patterns
- Starting FUs out of dependency order
- Skipping integration tests
- Proceeding without user approval at checkpoints
- Deploying with failing tests or unmet acceptance criteria
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

