agentleFS
marinvchmarinvch/Cortex/skills/audit-notes/SKILL.md

audit-notes

Skill1 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Vault health in one ritual — find and fix orphans, dead links, stale, duplicate or misplaced files and privacy leaks; `score` gives the read-only four-layer score, `graph` rebuilds the navigator. Triggers — "cortex audit", "fix dead links", "score my vault", "rebuild the graph", "what needs a MOC".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    add missing frontmatter; move misplaced files to the right PARA folder.

    line 45
  2. Distinctive:

    Don't guess; let the user decide, then execute their call.

    line 49
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep committed files data-free — never write personal/business facts into a shared file.

    line 55
  4. Very specific:

    Default: auto-apply [safe] fixes, pause for the user on every [judgment] call.

    line 59
  5. Very specific:

    After a cleanup, the graph mode regenerates the views.

    line 62

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/audit-notes — dispatch the auditor, then fix

One command for a complete health pass. It delegates the scan to the cortex-auditor custom subagent (agents/cortex-auditor.md), which runs read-only in its own context so the heavy globbing/link-mapping never bloats this conversation — then you apply the fixes here.

Three modes, one ritual

Asked forModeDo
a health score, "is my brain healthy", "score my setup"/audit-notes scoreread SCORE.md and follow it. It scores content and writes nothing but an optional saved report
rebuild the graph, "what needs a MOC", "tidy the vault"/audit-notes graphread GRAPH.md and follow it
anything else: orphans, dead links, misplaced files, a full check/audit-notesthe steps below. They find and fix structure

/audit and /reindex were separate rituals until 2.42.0. Someone who types either name wants score or graph.

What to do

  1. Dispatch the auditor. Launch the cortex-auditor subagent (via the Agent/Task tool, subagent_type: cortex-auditor) with the vault root as its target. It returns one ranked findings report: structural categories (orphans, dead links, stale, duplicate, misplaced, integrity/privacy, skill-wiring drift) + a four-layer content-health signal. Each finding is tagged [safe] or [judgment]. If the subagent is unavailable, read agents/cortex-auditor.md and run its scan inline — it holds the categories, the method and the output shape, so the report comes out the same either way. Only the isolation is lost.
  2. Show the report to the user — findings by category, plus the graph's node/link/dead-link counts.
  3. Lead with the employer firewall. Per the vault's AGENTS.md (templates/vault-AGENTS.md), day-job content in a home vault is a critical finding, not a style nit — report it above the structural findings and the health signal, naming file and line. The fix is to move the file into a gitignored archives/<name>-YYYY-MM-DD/ folder and confirm with git check-ignore -v that it landed there ignored. Treat it as [judgment]: show it, don't sanitize-and-file, and don't act until the user decides. If the report is clean on this, say so in one line and move on.
  4. Apply the [safe] fixes (these are mechanical + reversible):
    • resolve dead links; wire orphans in (add [[links]] from home.md/a MOC/related notes);
    • add missing frontmatter; move misplaced files to the right PARA folder;
    • mirror unwired skills into .claude/skills/ and add missing AGENTS.md/README.md entries;
    • archive truly-dead files (move to archives/, never delete).
  5. Surface the [judgment] calls — redundant merges, "stale or just quiet?", anything ambiguous. Don't guess; let the user decide, then execute their call.
  6. Re-run bash tools/cortex.sh to confirm the graph improved (fewer orphans, 0 dead), and report: findings by category, what you fixed, and what's left for the user to decide.

Don't

  • Never delete — move to archives/. Deletion is the user's call only.
  • Keep committed files data-free — never write personal/business facts into a shared file.
  • The subagent is read-only by design; all writes happen here, only after the report is shown.

Autonomy

Default: auto-apply [safe] fixes, pause for the user on every [judgment] call. If the user asks to approve each edit, switch to proposing all fixes first.

After a cleanup, the graph mode regenerates the views. Targets this vault — /trim-agent-docs is the same instinct pointed at another repo.

When the floor is not met

The scan itself is mechanical — globbing, link maps, git check-ignore. What needs the floor is ranking the findings and calling [safe] versus [judgment], and mistaking a judgment call for a safe one means an automatic fix to something that needed a human.

Below the floor: run it with every finding treated as [judgment] — report all of them and apply none automatically. The scan is still worth having; only the autonomy is withdrawn. The subagent fallback in step 1 is a separate concern: that is about the harness having subagents at all, not about model strength.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.