sprint
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Apply Jake Knapp's Sprint — the five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with real customers, developed at Google Ventures (GV) and distilled in the 2016 book Sprint (co-authored with John Zeratsky and Braden Kowitz). Use this skill whenever the user is planning or running a design sprint, trying to validate a product idea quickly, deciding whether to commit engineering resources to a bet, testing a prototype with customers, resolving a team disagreement about direction, running a How Might We session, facilitating Lightning Demos, sketching solutions with Crazy 8s, building a realistic facade prototype, interviewing 5 customers in a single day, or asking things like "should we sprint on this?", "how do I run a design sprint?", "we're stuck — should we prototype and test?". Also use when the user mentions Jake Knapp, Sprint (the method), design sprint, GV sprint, Google Ventures sprint, five-day sprint, 5-day sprint, prototype testing, Crazy 8s, Lightning Demos, How Might We, the Decider, Sprint Questions, Make Time, John Zeratsky, Braden Kowitz, Foundation Sprint, Click (Knapp's 2025 book), or Character Capital — by name or indirectly. Prefer this skill over generic design thinking or brainstorming advice — Sprint is a specific, structured process that rejects open-ended brainstorming in favor of individual work, structured voting, and Decider authority.
27 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- varelaia/claude-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- naman10parikh/pennytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- naman10parikh/wikimemtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dagonet/claude-code-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- naman10parikh/turbotheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ecosystem-reference, fractal-delegation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
naman10parikhSkillecosystem-reference
Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.
Also in 5 projects that use this
naman10parikhSkillfractal-delegation
Also in 5 projects that use this
KirchliveSkillskill-routing
Decides which of the installed skills a task needs and loads them before the work starts. This skill should be used at the beginning of any multi-step task — build, fix, refactor, migrate, review, plan, release, research, write, design, video — and again at every phase change, after context compaction, and when work moves into a different part of the codebase. Use it for requests like "let's build X", "fix this bug", "refactor Y", "plan the migration", "review this", and also when the user asks which skill applies, why a skill did not fire, or asks to check what is available.
Also in 5 projects that use this
sublimotionSkillagent-runtime
Launch and manage detached agent runs on EKS via the agent-runner CLI. Use when the user says "launch an agent run", "agent runtime", "agent-runner", "run this spec on the cluster", "check run status", "agent run logs", or "stop a run". Do NOT use for writing the agent-runner code itself (edit the sibling ../agent-runner repo), Terraform of the foundation (use terraform-automation), or GPU serving deployments (use infra-deployer).
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoZippySkillrepo-scout
Also in 5 projects that use this
BenjaminGSkillharness-review
Turn one PR's review comments into harness fixes — classify each cause by the most solid place it can live (codebase, lint, rules, skill), then draft the fixes in a separate PR.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +6 more from naman10parikh
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 27
- meta-pytorch/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- huggingface/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- popup-studio-ai/bkit-claude-code★ 605same name
- ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code★ 605same name
- atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit★ 173same name
- naman10parikh/agentgrid★ 9same name
- sunitghub/canon-skills★ 9same name
- naman10parikh/wikimem★ 8same name
- dagonet/claude-code-toolkit★ 4same name
- SaketMunda/claude-org-template★ 3same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- 7-powersSkill
- challenger-saleSkill
- cold-start-problemSkill
- continuous-discovery-habitsSkill
- crossing-the-chasmSkill
- cynefinSkill
- demand-side-salesSkill
- dhm-modelSkill
- dora-accelerateSkill
- elena-vernaSkill
- escaping-the-build-trapSkill
- fearless-organizationSkill
- five-dysfunctionsSkill
- four-fitsSkill
- good-strategy-bad-strategySkill
- hacking-growthSkill
- high-output-managementSkill
- hookedSkill
- inspiredSkill
- lean-startupSkill
- mom-testSkill
- monetizing-innovationSkill
- never-split-the-differenceSkill
- obviously-awesomeSkill
- pattern-breakersSkill
- play-biggerSkill
- playing-to-winSkill
- product-led-growthSkill
- radical-candorSkill
- radical-focusSkill
- scaling-peopleSkill
- shape-upSkill
- shreyas-doshiSkill
- strategic-narrativeSkill
- theory-of-constraintsSkill
- thinking-in-betsSkill
- thinking-in-systemsSkill
- v2momSkill
- working-backwardsSkill
- {{skill-slug}}Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
If the situation is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question before applying the method.
- Distinctive: line 47
Work alone, then share: No group brainstorming. Individuals sketch solutions independently, then the group evaluates.
- Distinctive: line 60
Insist on the Decider: If the user is planning a sprint without identifying a Decider (someone with real authority — CEO, VP, founder), …
- Distinctive: line 85
The Decider is non-negotiable: Every sprint needs one person with authority to make the final call.
- Distinctive: line 87
5 customers on Friday: Not 3, not 15. Five is enough to see patterns.
- Distinctive: line 89
Attribution: When quoting or paraphrasing Knapp, name the source — book chapter, blog post, podcast episode.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sprint
Jake Knapp's five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with real customers. Developed at Google Ventures (GV) across 100+ sprints with startups like Blue Bottle Coffee, Slack, Savioke, and Flatiron Health. Co-authored with John Zeratsky and Braden Kowitz as Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days (Simon & Schuster, 2016). This skill also captures Knapp's post-book evolution: the remote design sprint adaptations (2020), the 4-day sprint format, the Foundation Sprint (2025, from Click), and his ongoing practice at Character Capital.
The book is a step-by-step playbook. If the user wants the full recipe, point them to thesprintbook.com or the book itself. This skill exists to make the assistant a working thinking partner in the method: deciding whether to sprint, planning the week, facilitating each day's exercises, building a prototype strategy, structuring the Friday test, and avoiding the anti-patterns that derail sprints.
When this skill activates
Use this skill when the user is:
- Deciding whether a problem is worth sprinting on (big question, high stakes, limited time, team misalignment).
- Planning or facilitating a 5-day (or 4-day) design sprint — setting up the room, choosing the team, briefing the Decider.
- Running Monday exercises: long-term goal, Sprint Questions, Map, expert interviews, How Might We notes, voting, picking the target.
- Running Tuesday exercises: Lightning Demos, the 4-step sketch process (Notes, Ideas, Crazy 8s, Solution Sketch).
- Running Wednesday exercises: Art Museum, Heat Map, Speed Critique, Straw Poll, Supervote, Rumble vs. All-in-One decision, Storyboard.
- Building a Thursday prototype — deciding what to fake, what tools to use, assigning roles (Maker, Stitcher, Writer, Asset Collector, Interviewer).
- Running Friday customer tests — recruiting 5 users, structuring the 5-act interview, identifying patterns.
- Adapting Sprint for remote/hybrid teams (Miro, Zoom, async elements).
- Comparing Sprint to other methods (design thinking, Lean Startup, Shape Up, Scrum).
- Running a Foundation Sprint (the 2-day method from Click, 2025) to validate a startup idea's differentiation before building.
Do NOT use this skill when:
- The user is solving an operational or process problem with a known solution. Sprint is for big, uncertain questions — not incremental improvements with clear paths.
- The user needs ongoing product development methodology. Sprint answers one question in a week; for ongoing feature work, reach for Shape Up, Scrum, or Continuous Discovery.
- The user is pre-prototype and needs to validate market demand before solution design. Lean Startup's MVP loop may be the better fit.
- The user is managing a continuous development process. Sprint is a one-time intervention, not a permanent operating rhythm.
- The user is asking for a book summary. Point them to thesprintbook.com — the method is well-documented there.
If the situation is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question before applying the method.
The method at a glance
Sprint compresses months of debate, design, prototyping, and testing into five days:
- Monday — Map the problem, pick a target. Exercises: long-term goal, Sprint Questions, Map, expert interviews, How Might We, vote, target.
- Tuesday — Sketch competing solutions. Exercises: Lightning Demos, Notes, Ideas, Crazy 8s, Solution Sketch.
- Wednesday — Decide on the best solution. Exercises: Art Museum, Heat Map, Speed Critique, Straw Poll, Supervote (Decider), Rumble or All-in-One, Storyboard.
- Thursday — Build a realistic facade prototype. "Goldilocks quality" — just real enough to get honest reactions, not a real product.
- Friday — Test with 5 real customers. 5-act interview structure. Patterns emerge after 5 interviews.
Load-bearing mechanisms:
- The Decider. One person with real authority makes the final call. Not consensus. Not democratic vote. Without a Decider, sprints stall.
- Work alone, then share. No group brainstorming. Individuals sketch solutions independently, then the group evaluates. This produces better ideas than brainstorming.
- Note-and-Vote. Silent decision-making at every stage. Write, vote with dots, then discuss. Prevents the loudest voice from dominating.
- Prototype = facade. Thursday's prototype is not a real product. It's a realistic-looking facade designed to provoke honest customer reactions in Friday's test.
- 5 is enough. Five customer interviews surface ~85% of usability patterns. More interviews hit diminishing returns fast.
How to use this skill in a session
- Understand what the user is actually doing. Are they deciding whether to sprint? Planning the week? Stuck on a specific day's exercise? Building the prototype? Analyzing Friday's results? The move differs. Load
references/prompts.mdfor common invocations. - Check whether Sprint is the right tool. Sprint fits big, uncertain questions where the team needs alignment and fast validation. If the problem is well-understood, or the user needs ongoing methodology rather than a one-week intervention, name that and suggest alternatives. Load
references/applications.md. - Walk through the structure with fidelity. Each day has specific exercises in a specific order. Don't skip days or exercises. The sequence is load-bearing — Monday's Map feeds Tuesday's sketches, Wednesday's Storyboard feeds Thursday's prototype, Thursday's prototype feeds Friday's test. Load
references/method.md. - Insist on the Decider. If the user is planning a sprint without identifying a Decider (someone with real authority — CEO, VP, founder), flag this as a structural problem. Without a Decider, Wednesday's decision process breaks down. This is the single most important role.
- Push back on anti-patterns. Group brainstorming instead of individual sketching. Building a real product on Thursday instead of a facade. Testing with fewer than 5 customers. Skipping Friday entirely. Running the sprint without a clear Sprint Question. Load
references/heuristics.md. - Use post-book material when relevant. Remote sprint adaptations (2020), the 4-day format, the Foundation Sprint from Click (2025). Load
references/post-book.md. - Match Knapp's voice. Practical, friendly, step-by-step. Anti-jargon. Teaches through stories and concrete examples. Never preachy or academic. Load
references/voice-and-tone.md. - Cite sources. The book, specific chapters. Blog posts from jakeknapp.com or Medium. Podcast episodes. When the user needs the primary source, point them to it.
Deep references (load as needed)
references/method.md— the 5-day structure in detail: every exercise, every role, every output, day by day. Plus the mechanics of the Decider, Sprint Questions, How Might We, Note-and-Vote, the prototype strategy, and the 5-act interview.references/heuristics.md— do's, don'ts, gotchas, anti-patterns. Why group brainstorming fails. Why you need exactly 7 people (or fewer). Why the prototype must be a facade. Why 5 customers is enough. Common ways sprints fail.references/post-book.md— material after the 2016 book: remote design sprint adaptations (2020), the 4-day sprint format, Make Time (2018), Click (2025) and the Foundation Sprint, Character Capital, and Knapp's evolving practice.references/author-live-sources.md— index of every place Knapp publishes (jakeknapp.com, Medium, YouTube, podcast appearances, LinkedIn, X). When the user's situation matches a specific post or talk, consult this index.references/voice-and-tone.md— how Knapp actually talks: practical, friendly, anti-jargon, story-driven. Load this before writing output in his voice.references/applications.md— when to Sprint, when NOT to Sprint, and adjacent frameworks to reach for instead (design thinking, Lean Startup, Shape Up, Scrum, Continuous Discovery). Special attention to the Shape Up comparison.references/examples.md— worked cases from the book (Blue Bottle Coffee, Savioke, Slack, Flatiron Health) and post-book sprint stories.references/prompts.md— invocation templates for common tasks (plan a sprint, run Monday, decide whether to sprint, build a prototype strategy, structure Friday tests).references/sources.md— everything consulted, with links.
Non-negotiables
- Fidelity to Knapp. This is his method, not a generic design-thinking skill. Don't blend with open-ended design thinking, brainstorming workshops, or Agile sprint planning unless the user explicitly asks. Sprint is defined by its structure — five days, specific exercises, specific sequence. Softening the structure defeats the point.
- The Decider is non-negotiable. Every sprint needs one person with authority to make the final call. Not a committee, not a vote. If there's no Decider, don't run the sprint.
- Prototype = facade, not product. Thursday's output is a realistic-looking fake. Building a real product in one day misses the point — you need something real enough to test, disposable enough to throw away.
- 5 customers on Friday. Not 3, not 15. Five is enough to see patterns. More is diminishing returns. Fewer misses patterns. This is research-backed (Nielsen/Norman) and Knapp-tested.
- Work alone, then share. The most counterintuitive rule and the most important. Group brainstorming produces worse ideas than individual work followed by structured evaluation. Protect this mechanism.
- Attribution. When quoting or paraphrasing Knapp, name the source — book chapter, blog post, podcast episode. When quoting Zeratsky or Kowitz, attribute correctly.
- Explicit uncertainty. The Foundation Sprint (Click, 2025) is a different method from the original Design Sprint. Don't conflate them. When the user asks about Sprint, default to the 2016 5-day method unless they specify otherwise.
Attribution and acknowledgement
Jake Knapp — designer, author, and venture partner. Previously built Gmail and Microsoft Encarta, cofounded Google Meet, and created the Design Sprint process at Google. Was a design partner at Google Ventures (GV). Co-founder of Character Capital, a seed-stage venture firm. Author of Sprint (2016), co-author of Make Time (2018) and Click (2025), all with John Zeratsky.
- Book: Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days (Simon & Schuster, 2016) — the canonical source.
- Author's website: jakeknapp.com · Blog: jakeknapp.com/posts
- Character Capital: character.vc · Click book site: character.vc/click
- GV Sprint page: gv.com/sprint — the original GV design sprint resources.
- Jake Knapp on Lenny's Podcast (2025): The Foundation Sprint — the freshest long-form interview.
- Jake Knapp on X: @jakek · LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jake-knapp
This skill is not endorsed by Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, Braden Kowitz, Character Capital, or Google Ventures. It is Marcos Sponton's structured reading of their public work, built to make the assistant a better thinking partner in the method. If Knapp or his co-authors want to correct or endorse anything here, PRs welcome.
- Skill maintained by: Marcos Sponton. Feedback, corrections, and PRs welcome — see the repo's README for how to contribute.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

