{{skill-slug}}
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Apply {{Author}}'s {{Framework Name}} — {{one-line what it does}}. Use this skill whenever the user is doing {{domain}} work — {{trigger scenario 1}}, {{trigger scenario 2}}, {{trigger scenario 3}}, or asking things like "{{typical question 1}}", "{{typical question 2}}". Also use when the user mentions {{Author}}, {{Book Title}}, or {{Framework Name}} by name, even indirectly.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- 7-powersSkill
- challenger-saleSkill
- cold-start-problemSkill
- continuous-discovery-habitsSkill
- crossing-the-chasmSkill
- cynefinSkill
- demand-side-salesSkill
- dhm-modelSkill
- dora-accelerateSkill
- elena-vernaSkill
- escaping-the-build-trapSkill
- fearless-organizationSkill
- five-dysfunctionsSkill
- four-fitsSkill
- good-strategy-bad-strategySkill
- hacking-growthSkill
- high-output-managementSkill
- hookedSkill
- inspiredSkill
- lean-startupSkill
- mom-testSkill
- monetizing-innovationSkill
- never-split-the-differenceSkill
- obviously-awesomeSkill
- pattern-breakersSkill
- play-biggerSkill
- playing-to-winSkill
- product-led-growthSkill
- radical-candorSkill
- radical-focusSkill
- scaling-peopleSkill
- shape-upSkill
- shreyas-doshiSkill
- sprintSkill
- strategic-narrativeSkill
- theory-of-constraintsSkill
- thinking-in-betsSkill
- thinking-in-systemsSkill
- v2momSkill
- working-backwardsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
If the user's situation is at the edge, ask them one clarifying question before applying the framework in full.
- Distinctive: line 50
Attribution: When quoting or paraphrasing, name the source.
- Distinctive: line 51
Explicit uncertainty: When the author has publicly refined or reversed a position, name it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
{{Framework Name}}
{{One paragraph. What the framework is, who authored it (with credentials in one clause), what problem it solves. Reference the primary book/article and the fact that this skill also captures post-publication refinements from the author.}}
When this skill activates
Use this skill when the user is:
- {{trigger scenario, phrased as an actual situation}}
- {{another}}
- {{another}}
Do NOT use this skill when:
- {{negative case — a related but different situation where another framework fits better, or where this one would produce false confidence}}
- {{another}}
If the user's situation is at the edge, ask them one clarifying question before applying the framework in full.
The framework at a glance
{{2-4 sentence summary. The minimum a reader needs to know before you dive in. If the framework has explicit components (a kernel, a cascade, a canvas), name them here as a bulleted list — one line each.}}
How to use this skill in a session
- {{Step 1 — usually: understand what the user is trying to do, load the relevant reference file.}}
- {{Step 2 — walk the user through the method with fidelity to the author.}}
- {{Step 3 — challenge weak answers using the author's explicit anti-patterns from
references/heuristics.md.}} - {{Step 4 — pull post-book material from
references/post-book.mdwhen the user hits a topic the original text doesn't cover.}} - {{Attribution — when you introduce a specific device or quote, cite the source (book chapter, HBR article, podcast episode).}}
Deep references (load as needed)
references/method.md— the method in depth, in the author's own terms.references/heuristics.md— do's, don'ts, gotchas, pro tips, anti-patterns, common misapplications, with quotes and attribution.references/post-book.md— dense material from AFTER the primary publication (podcasts, HBR articles, essays, interviews). This is the differential of this skill — the density the book alone doesn't capture.references/author-live-sources.md— index of every place {{Author}} publishes regularly (Substack/Medium/blog, YouTube, podcast appearances, official archive). When the user's situation matches a specific essay/video, consult this index and either point them to it or WebFetch inline. Community PRs to this file keep the skill from going stale.references/voice-and-tone.md— how {{Author}} actually talks when they teach or defend the framework. Load this before you write output on their behalf — voice is part of the method, not decoration.references/applications.md— where this framework fits, where it doesn't, adjacent frameworks to reach for instead.references/examples.md— worked cases the author has used publicly.references/prompts.md— invocation templates ("start a {{framework}} session", "critique this {{artifact}}", "help me answer {{specific question}}").references/sources.md— complete traceability (books, articles, podcasts, videos), with links.
Non-negotiables
- Fidelity to the author. This skill is a distillation of {{Author}}'s work, not a generic {{domain}} skill. Do not blend with adjacent frameworks unless the user explicitly asks.
- Attribution. When quoting or paraphrasing, name the source. If the user is going to act on something, they deserve to know whether it came from {{Author}}'s 2013 book, a 2024 podcast, or the skill author's synthesis.
- Explicit uncertainty. When the author has publicly refined or reversed a position, name it. Don't pretend the 2013 view is the current view when it isn't.
Attribution and acknowledgement
{{Author}} — {{one-sentence bio credentialing them}}. Author of {{Book Title}} ({{Publisher}}, {{Year}}). This skill is built by reading their public material carefully and structuring it for AI conversations. It is not endorsed by {{Author}} unless explicitly stated.
- Book: [{{Book Title}}]({{Amazon/publisher link}}) — the canonical source. Read it.
- Author's other work: {{Author's website / Medium / Substack}}
- Skill maintained by: Marcos Sponton ({{GitHub}}). Feedback and PRs welcome — see the repo's CONTRIBUTING.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

