fresh-context-review
Skill1 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Independent review of a completed phase from a clean context. Ask what is wrong that the builder cannot see. Load only on the fresh-context-review route. Not a second conductor.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fmmenchi/ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- theDRElabs/opencode-configtheir own version, first seen Aug 26, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
- theDRElabs/opencode-config★ 1same name
- fmmenchi/ai-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/humanizer/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-reachSkill
- animateSkill
- backend-architectureSkill
- ci-security-scanning-with-strixSkill
- diagram-generatorSkill
- eas-app-storesSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- expo-data-fetchingSkill
- expo-dev-clientSkill
- expo-native-uiSkill
- expo-project-structureSkill
- expo-routerSkill
- expo-upgradeSkill
- final-showcaseSkill
- fix-security-vulnerabilities-with-strixSkill
- gsap-coreSkill
- gsap-performanceSkill
- gsap-reactSkill
- gsap-scrolltriggerSkill
- gsap-timelineSkill
- hallmarkSkill
- humanizerSkill
- impeccableSkill
- ml-experimentSkill
- obsidian-markdownSkill
- orchestra-conductorSkill
- orchestra-docsSkill
- orchestra-shipSkill
- orchestra-vaultSkill
- penetration-testing-with-strixSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- postgres-best-practicesSkill
- pretty-mermaidSkill
- prompt-forgeSkill
- r3f-shadersSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- reaSkill
- refero-designSkill
- research-paperSkill
- resource-scoutSkill
- review-animationsSkill
- semgrep-adapterSkill
- ship-safeSkill
- skill-security-checkSkill
- stitch::code-to-designSkill
- stitch::extract-design-mdSkill
- stitch::extract-static-htmlSkill
- stitch::generate-designSkill
- stitch::manage-design-systemSkill
- stitch::react-componentsSkill
- stitch::upload-to-stitchSkill
- store-releaseSkill
- supabaseSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- taste-designSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Use a clean context. For visual work, require a running app or golden stills.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fresh-context review
Job-loaded. Skip unless the human said a milestone is ready for review, pre-release, or named fresh-context-review.
This is a critic, not a planner. The conductor remains the chat the human is talking to.
Skip
- The phase is not complete
- The request is to build or redesign from scratch
- The same chat that built the work is asked to rubber-stamp it without a fresh context
Ask
What is wrong that the builder can no longer see?
Use a clean context. For visual work, require a running app or golden stills. Fill the verification ledger. Issue Keep / Rework / Kill / Park. Do not invent a second plan.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.