research-paper
Skill881 starsChanged 33 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to write, draft or revise an ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE or any single section of one — abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion or conclusion — for an IMRaD paper, conference paper or short/workshop paper reporting their own experiments, in English or Chinese (研究论文/期刊论文/会议论文, or one part such as 摘要, 引言, 方法, 结果, 讨论部分). Triggers: "write the paper", "draft our manuscript", "write the Discussion of our paper", "把我们这篇工作写成论文", "帮我写论文的讨论部分", "论文写作". Results-first: the user's actual results (tables, metrics, figures) are the raw material; this skill never invents an experiment or a number. NOT for literature reviews/surveys or their sections (use medical-imaging-review), NOT for proposals (use research-proposal), NOT for grant applications.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mahik504/orchestra-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- velonx/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 24, 2026
- geronimo-iia/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 26, 2026
- OlixIgnacious/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 7, 2026
- aniketkrs/research-papertheir own version, first seen May 16, 2026
- XiaYiHann/scholar-3their own version, first seen Feb 25, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- aniketkrs/research-paper★ 4same name
- geronimo-iia/agent-skills★ 2same name
- OlixIgnacious/agent-skills★ 2same name
- mahik504/orchestra-workflow★ 1same name
- velonx/agent-skills★ 1same name
- XiaYiHann/scholar-3★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- lit-searchSkill
- medical-imaging-reviewSkill
- paper-slide-deckSkill
- research-proposalSkill
- scholar-slidesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.