medical-imaging-review
Skill881 starsChanged 35 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to plan, conduct, document, synthesize, or draft any part of a medical imaging AI literature review (narrative review or method survey, scoping review, or systematic review with qualitative synthesis), including a single section or introduction, protocol design, literature search, screening, extraction, risk-of-bias appraisal, evidence synthesis, or the methods and results write-up; Chinese requests such as 综述, 文献综述, 综述章节, 系统综述 or 范围综述 count. Do not use this skill to perform a meta-analysis or umbrella review. When a review asks to pool results, still load it: stop, explain that pooling needs a specialized evidence-synthesis workflow this environment does not provide, and offer a qualitative synthesis instead.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 13, 2026
- qinyan-ai/qinyan-academic-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills★ 910same name
- qinyan-ai/qinyan-academic-skills★ 80same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- lit-searchSkill
- paper-slide-deckSkill
- research-paperSkill
- research-proposalSkill
- scholar-slidesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.