agentleFS
Sign inStart free
luisgui1757luisgui1757/sentinel/skills/file-pr/SKILL.md

file-pr

Skill0 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

File a concise pull request. Use when the user asks to file, open, or create a PR.

  • Commits and pushes

22 other projects use a version of this, 13 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use docs-loop, full-loop and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GeiserXSkill

    docs-loop

    Use when the user asks to audit docs, check documentation for stale claims, or verify docs against the code.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GeiserXSkill

    full-loop

    Drive a repository to done with sergio-loop, then keep improving it with refine-loop at a descending theta. Use only when the user explicitly invokes full-loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +7 more from GeiserX

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before filing, check whether a PR for this branch already exists.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    If model identity is unavailable, name the harness without guessing a model.

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Before submission, check the title, description, quotes, and attachments for secrets and private details.

    line 42
  4. Very specific:

    Do not post a follow-up PR comment unless it serves the user's request.

    line 53

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

File PR

Before filing, check whether a PR for this branch already exists. Review the diff locally against the base branch (usually origin/main) to make sure its contents match the goal. For an interface change, run the beast-ui skill first if it is installed.

PR titles usually become commit messages, so follow the repository's title conventions. Look at recently merged PRs and Git history for examples. Prefer a concise, human-readable title that explains why the change matters:

BAD

❌ perf(server): negotiate permessage-deflate on the websocket

GOOD

✅ perf(server): cut websocket frame size by 70%+ with gzipping

Open the description with a simple explanation of the problem based on the user's original prompt, then briefly explain the solution. Do not lead with an implementation inventory:

BAD

❌ Removed implicit workspace carry-over from every "new thread" entry point (cmd+n / cmd+shift+o, sidebar v1/v2 buttons, command palette). New threads inherit only the project from context; branch, worktree, and env mode always come from the configured defaults. Deleted buildContextualThreadOptions, startNewThreadInProjectFromContext, and the v1 sidebar's seed-context machinery.

GOOD

✅ My "new worktree" default was ignored when starting new threads on existing worktrees. Super unintuitive. Now your preferences always apply.

End the description with the public model name and harness that made the changes, for example Created with <model> in <harness>. Include subagent models that wrote part of the change. Use the model name the harness reports. If model identity is unavailable, name the harness without guessing a model.

Before submission, check the title, description, quotes, and attachments for secrets and private details.

Open a real PR rather than a draft so review bots run. On another forge, use its CLI or API for the same step. Find the forge from the PR URL, the remote URL, the CI files and the signed-in CLIs. Pass the title and description as arguments, so that no prompt waits for input. On GitHub, if gh pr create fails because the GraphQL rate limit is used up, open it through REST with gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls -f title=... -f head=... -f base=... -F body=@<file>. If the user also asked to babysit it, continue with the babysit-pr skill.

Do not post a follow-up PR comment unless it serves the user's request. When a comment is needed, use the leaving-pr-comments skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free