guidelines
Skill217 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
5 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- crocotaste/crocotaste-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- akash-network/nodeedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- microsoft/github-copilot-modernizationtheir own version, first seen Sep 22, 2026
- shellui/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- zen-mcp/browseredited, first seen Apr 25, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- akash-network/node★ 1.1k95% same
- zen-mcp/browser★ 293% same
Wrote their own version · 3
- microsoft/github-copilot-modernization★ 48same name
- shellui/skills★ 2same name
- crocotaste/crocotaste-plugin★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- appv3/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- desktop/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- documents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- mobile/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- web/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- Distinctive: line 14
If a simpler approach exists, say so.
- Distinctive: line 15
If something is unclear, stop.
- Distinctive: line 21
No features beyond what was asked.
- Distinctive: line 22
No abstractions for single-use code.
- Distinctive: line 24
No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- Distinctive: line 25
If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
- Distinctive: line 33
When editing existing code:
- Distinctive: line 34
Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Distinctive: line 35
Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Distinctive: line 37
If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
- Distinctive: line 39
When your changes create orphans:
- Very specific: line 40
Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Distinctive: line 41
Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

