agentleFS
akash-networkakash-network/node/.agents/skills/guidelines/SKILL.md

guidelines

Skill1.1k starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

5 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Trending

Quiet since July.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 1 mentionFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 1 mentionMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 2 mentionsJul 2026: 2 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the akash-network/node repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about akash-network/node

The biggest 5 of 17 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 17

Talked about on GitHub (17 times).

On GitHub · 17

12 more on GitHub
  • Other versions5 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 2

    1. lthoangg/OpenAgentd★ 21799% same
    2. zen-mcp/browser★ 298% same

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. microsoft/github-copilot-modernization★ 48same name
    2. shellui/skills★ 2same name
    3. crocotaste/crocotaste-plugin★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    If a simpler approach exists, say so.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    If something is unclear, stop.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    No features beyond what was asked.

    line 25
  5. Distinctive:

    No abstractions for single-use code.

    line 26
  6. Distinctive:

    No error handling for impossible scenarios.

    line 28
  7. Distinctive:

    If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

    line 29
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

    line 31
  9. Distinctive:

    When editing existing code:

    line 37
  10. Distinctive:

    Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.

    line 38
  11. Distinctive:

    Don't refactor things that aren't broken.

    line 39
  12. Distinctive:

    If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

    line 41
  13. Distinctive:

    When your changes create orphans:

    line 43
  14. Very specific:

    Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.

    line 44
  15. Distinctive:

    Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

    line 45

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Guidelines

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.