agentleFS
lllllllamalllllllama/RigorPilot-Skills/skills/safe-debug/SKILL.md

safe-debug

Skill495 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this as the Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Use the shared operating principles in ../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md.

    line 11
  3. Distinctive:

    When the user wants a broad repository walkthrough without an active failure.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    When the task is speculative experimentation or code adaptation.

    line 25
  5. Distinctive:

    When the user is asking for a large refactor or readability rewrite.

    line 26
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not modify repository code by default.

    line 31
  7. Distinctive:

    If a patch is needed, propose the smallest fix and require explicit approval first.

    line 32
  8. Very specific:

    Use references/debug-policy.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-rigor-principles.md, and the shared …

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

safe-debug

Use this as the Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill. The installed slug remains safe-debug for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide conservative diagnosis without blocking the model from finding the local root cause.

When to apply

  • The user provides a traceback, terminal error, or concrete training or inference failure symptom.
  • The user wants diagnosis, root-cause narrowing, and minimal patch suggestions before code is changed.
  • The user wants a safe debug flow with explicit human approval before mutation.

When not to apply

  • When the user wants a broad repository walkthrough without an active failure.
  • When the task is speculative experimentation or code adaptation.
  • When the user is asking for a large refactor or readability rewrite.

Clear boundaries

  • Diagnose first.
  • Do not modify repository code by default.
  • If a patch is needed, propose the smallest fix and require explicit approval first.
  • Escalate savepoint or branch creation before medium-risk or high-risk changes.
  • A debug fix is not automatically a research contribution; if it changes experiment meaning or comparability, say so explicitly.

Output expectations

  • debug_outputs/DIAGNOSIS.md
  • debug_outputs/PATCH_PLAN.md
  • debug_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/debug-policy.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-rigor-principles.md, and the shared ../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-pitfall-checklist.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.