explore-run
Skill495 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline execution, conservative training verification, default routing, verified SOTA claims, or implicit experimentation.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-research-exploreSkill
- ai-research-reproductionSkill
- analyze-projectSkill
- env-and-assets-bootstrapSkill
- explore-codeSkill
- minimal-run-and-auditSkill
- paper-context-resolverSkill
- repo-intake-and-planSkill
- run-trainSkill
- safe-debugSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this as the Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill.
- Very specific: line 11
Use the shared operating principles in ../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md.
- Distinctive: line 17
When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs.
- Distinctive: line 18
When the task is a small-subset validation, short-cycle training probe, batch sweep, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trial.
- Distinctive: line 19
When the output should rank candidate runs rather than certify trusted success.
- Distinctive: line 23
When the user wants trusted training execution or conservative verification.
- Distinctive: line 24
When there is no explicit exploratory authorization.
- Distinctive: line 25
When the task is repository setup, intake, or debugging.
- Very specific: line 30
Use ai-research-explore instead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory code changes.
- Very specific: line 40
Default weights should stay conservative unless the researcher explicitly provides selection_weights.
- Distinctive: line 42
If runs are executed later, downstream ranking should switch to real execution evidence, not stay purely heuristic.
- Very specific: line 46
Use variant_axes to define the candidate dimension grid.
- Very specific: line 47
Use subset_sizes and short_run_steps to express exploratory run scale.
- Very specific: line 48
Use selection_weights to rebalance cost, success_rate, and expected_gain.
- Very specific: line 49
Use primary_metric and metric_goal so downstream ranking can order executed candidates consistently.
- Very specific: line 61
Use references/execution-policy.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/explore-variant-spec.md, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
explore-run
Use this as the Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill. The installed slug
remains explore-run for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in
../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide
candidate run planning while preserving model judgment about the active repo.
When to apply
- When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs.
- When the task is a small-subset validation, short-cycle training probe, batch sweep, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trial.
- When the output should rank candidate runs rather than certify trusted success.
When not to apply
- When the user wants trusted training execution or conservative verification.
- When there is no explicit exploratory authorization.
- When the task is repository setup, intake, or debugging.
Clear boundaries
- This skill owns exploratory execution planning and summary only.
- Use
ai-research-exploreinstead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory code changes. - It may hand off actual command execution to
minimal-run-and-auditorrun-train. - It should keep experiment state isolated from the trusted baseline.
- It should prefer small-subset and short-cycle checks before heavier exploratory runs.
- It should label run results as bounded evidence and explain when a comparison is not directly fair.
Ranking Semantics
- Pre-execution candidate selection uses three factors:
cost,success_rate, andexpected_gain. - Default weights should stay conservative unless the researcher explicitly provides
selection_weights. - Budget pruning still applies after scoring through
max_variantsandmax_short_cycle_runs. - If runs are executed later, downstream ranking should switch to real execution evidence, not stay purely heuristic.
Variant Spec Hints
- Use
variant_axesto define the candidate dimension grid. - Use
subset_sizesandshort_run_stepsto express exploratory run scale. - Use
selection_weightsto rebalancecost,success_rate, andexpected_gain. - Use
primary_metricandmetric_goalso downstream ranking can order executed candidates consistently.
Output expectations
explore_outputs/CHANGESET.mdexplore_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.mdexplore_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.mdexplore_outputs/TOP_RUNS.mdexplore_outputs/status.json
Notes
Use references/execution-policy.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/explore-variant-spec.md, ../ai-research-reproduction/references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/plan_variants.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

