ketchup
Skill1 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Catch the user up on everything in this chat since their last message, in plain words. Give each action item an executive summary with enough context to make the call. Use for /ketchup.
28 other projects use a version of this, 19 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- maxatwork/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- painhardcore/pstackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ketchup-video, in-your-own-words and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
drafaelSkillin-your-own-words
Restate the user's goals and the problem they are trying to solve to check understanding. Manual invocation only; use when the user explicitly invokes in-your-own-words or requests this understanding check. Do not solve the task or rewrite the assistant's last answer.
Also in 23 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 10 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillmaintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.
Also in 16 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillcreate-formal-verification-skill
Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, \"model-check this race\", \"prove this invariant\", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.
Also in 17 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 18 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheOnlyFusionCube
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 19
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k11% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7111% same
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 2111% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1810% same
- painhardcore/pstack★ 1811% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1310% same
- caidanw/skills★ 1116% same
- adjohn/pstack★ 911% same
- alexnthnz/keel★ 511% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 369% same
9 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 9
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- instructure/canvas-lms★ 6.9ksame name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- conscientiousness/herdr-pstack-orchestrator★ 2same name
- fullerzz/agent-skills★ 2same name
- christofferbergj/agent-skills★ 1same name
- dan-myles/skills★ 1same name
- drafael/coding-harness★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- broSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- hq-modeSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- lab-containersSkill
- lab-edisonSkill
- lab-hpcSkill
- lab-jupyterSkill
- lab-setupSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- unslopSkill
- unslop-zhSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
Files
Ketchup
Catch the user up on everything in this chat since the last message they wrote before /ketchup. Notifications and subagent results are not their messages. Write in the plain voice of /bro, and skip its restating step. Assume the user remembers their last message and nothing after it. Call each PR, branch, or agent by a name they would know, not by a label you invented during the work.
Gather what changed
Keep this turn read-only. Collect your own work since that message, reports from subagents, and messages from anyone else in this chat. Check the current state of each PR, CI run, agent, or batch job or remote task, such as a Slurm job or an Edison run, that this chat touched. Say which are still running and which you could not check.
An action item is a decision or step only the user can take, such as a product choice, an approval, an irreversible action, or access you lack. Include any still waiting on the user, even one raised before their last message. Work you can still do yourself is not an action item.
Write the reply
Open with one sentence that says how many action items there are, or that there are none. If nothing happened and nothing waits on the user, say so and stop.
Then say what happened, most important first. Give each result and what it means for the user. Skip steps that changed nothing. Name in one line any work left that you can do yourself.
Then give each action item a short executive summary. Cover the decision to make, why it matters now, the options and what each costs, your recommendation, and what happens if the user does not answer. If you do not know a part, say so instead of guessing. Link to the detail when there is one, and write the summary so the user can decide without opening it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

