agentleFS
lightarktechlightarktech/founder-coding-skills/skills/loop-contract/SKILL.md

loop-contract

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write an exit-condition contract before letting any AI run unattended — a background agent, a scheduled loop, a "keep going until it works" task. Use whenever work is handed off to run without a human watching.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never launch "until it's done".

    line 6

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Never launch "until it's done". "Done" is not observable; loops without observable exits run forever, burn budget, and drift. Fill this contract first — every field, before launch:

GOAL      One sentence: take X from state A to state B.
DONE      Observable end state ("tests green + lint clean + PR open").
          Banned: "done", "polished", "production ready", "good enough".
SCALE     ≤100 turns, ≤5 tasks. Hitting a cap = save progress, report, split.
STOP      Reached DONE / hit a cap / stuck needing a human → stop and report.
RETRY     Not DONE and moves remain → read the last failure, change ONE
          variable, retry. Never shotgun multiple changes per iteration.
VERIFY    How it checks its own work: tests, an independent evaluator,
          or adversarial review (max 2 rounds).
FIRST     Context + what to check before starting — a fresh session
          knows nothing about this conversation.
RED LINES What it must never touch (production, user data, permissions,
          anything irreversible).

Trust mechanisms, not luck: the point is to put unattended work inside a box that is observable, correctable, and reversible.

Success criteria

A stranger could run the loop from the contract alone. The loop cannot run forever — every path leads to DONE, a cap, or a report.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.