prd
Skill0 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Phase 2 of the Builder Method — turn the concrete idea into a PRD (product requirements document) with numbered user flows and acceptance criteria, written to builder/02-prd.md. Use after the Idea phase, when the user wants to define exactly what to build, or runs /builder:prd.
129 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- realRoc/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- felipefontoura/claude-sdd-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- felipeam86/pipe-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shaqmughal/seekstonetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use context-optimize, usecase and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ibahgatSkillcontext-optimize
Improve context efficiency and cache stability for long or complex sessions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gabriellstSkillusecase
Create an application use case. Use when implementing business operations like CreateOrder, ProcessPayment, CancelBooking. Use this skill for any command/mutation that orchestrates domain logic, whether simple CRUD or complex multi-step transactions with sagas. Dispatch hub — routes to typescript/go variants by file extension.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jidechaoSkillmodern-go
Modernize Go code by applying version-appropriate idioms and APIs (gofix-style transformations). Scans go.mod for the Go version, then transforms Go source files to use modern patterns—from Go 1.0 through 1.26+. Use when the user says "现代化","现代Go语言", "地道的", "idiomatic", "modernize", "modern-go", "update Go code", "gofix", or wants to upgrade Go idioms.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ulises-jeremiasSkilltrd
WHAT — Draft and review a Technical Requirements Document (TRD) using the template, typically
Also in 3 projects that use this
jidechaoSkillloop-it
Automated issue loop with checkpoint/resume: fetch open GitHub issues → dependency-aware topological sort → implement each issue end-to-end → review with /review-it → document with /note-it → ship with /ship-it → repeat. Persists state to .loop-state.json for crash recovery. Triggers on: loop-it, loop issues, auto implement, 批量实现, 循环实现, 实现所有issue, 恢复循环, resume loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
snarktankSkillralph
Convert PRDs to prd.json format for the Ralph autonomous agent system. Use when you have an existing PRD and need to convert it to Ralph's JSON format. Triggers on: convert this prd, turn this into ralph format, create prd.json from this, ralph json.
Also in 16 projects that use this
- +2 more from jidechao
Other versions129 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 129
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- snarktank/ralph★ 22ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- smallnest/autoresearch★ 571same name
- snarktank/compound-product★ 542same name
- CatCatUncle/openworkbuddy★ 398same name
- smallnest/goal-workflow★ 283same name
- OffchainLabs/arbitrum-docs★ 252same name
- julianromli/ai-skills★ 215same name
- golbin/agent-skills★ 214same name
119 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 106 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
If the PRD has debt (it was generated by a gate), offer to review it first, as gates.md explains.
- Very specific: line 34
If the file already exists, follow "Existing outputs" in state-rules.md (revise it, never overwrite the user's edits).
- Very specific: line 48
If the subagent tool isn't available, do the review yourself, with the same checklist (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/prd-reviewer.md).
- Distinctive: line 57
every flow has at least one acceptance criterion.
- Distinctive: line 61
Ask the user to approve the PRD.
- Distinctive: line 64
update the progress page.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 106 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Phase 2 · PRD
Goal: a document precise enough for Claude to build from as autonomously as possible.
Input: builder/01-idea.md.
Output: builder/02-prd.md, with its flows mirrored into state.flows.
Read and follow:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/tone.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/state-rules.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/gates.md: apply the PRD gate first.${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/prd/references/prompts.md(the method's original intent)
If the PRD has debt (it was generated by a gate), offer to review it first, as gates.md explains.
Step 1 · clarify
Set phases.prd.status to in_progress. Read 01-idea.md. Find what is still undefined, and ask about it in small batches:
- users and roles;
- the main things each user does;
- data (what is stored, how sensitive it is);
- rules and limits (e.g. "cancel up to 24 h before");
- edge cases (what if a slot is taken, what if there's no connection…);
- privacy, and tone and look.
Plan before writing: summarise what you understood in a short list and get a yes.
Step 2 · write
If the file already exists, follow "Existing outputs" in state-rules.md (revise it, never overwrite the user's edits). Otherwise: write builder/02-prd.md from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/prd/templates/02-prd.md. Translate the section headings to the user's language. Keep these markers exactly, because other phases rely on them:
- each flow heading is
### F<n> — <name>(F1, F2…; the long dash —); - each flow has an acceptance list. In English it is written
Acceptance:with items of the formWhen <situation>, then <result>.In other languages, translate the words but keep the same structure.
Each flow is one thing a user does from start to finish ("Book a slot", "Cancel a booking"). Aim for 3–8 flows in a v1.
Mirror the flows into state.flows: { "id": "F1", "name", "acceptance": [...], "tasks": [], "validation": "pending" }. Set project.hasFrontend if it is still null.
Step 3 · review
Delegate the review to the prd-reviewer subagent (Agent tool, subagent_type: "builder:prd-reviewer", or prd-reviewer if that's how it's listed). Give it the paths of 01-idea.md and 02-prd.md. It returns a numbered list of proposed changes; it doesn't edit files.
Show the user the proposals in plain language and apply the ones they accept. If the user asked you to proceed with defaults, apply the ones marked "important". Make sure the "Design notes" section describes the user flows from the user's point of view.
If the subagent tool isn't available, do the review yourself, with the same checklist (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/prd-reviewer.md).
Step 4 · polish (optional)
Offer one more pass over the flows, looking for friction and confusing steps. Skip it (skipped) if the user declines or asked for defaults.
Finish
Check that:
- every flow has at least one acceptance criterion;
state.flowsmatches the document;hasFrontendistrueorfalse.
Ask the user to approve the PRD. Then:
- set
review: reviewedand mark the phasedone; - set
currentPhasetodesign, or tobuildifhasFrontendisfalse; in that case also set Design tonot_applicable; - update the progress page.
Close by suggesting /builder:next.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

