build
Skill0 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Phase 4 of the Builder Method — turn the PRD into the first working version of the product. Plan the tasks (each covering user flows), set up the repository, then build task by task with tests and a checkpoint commit after each one. Use when the PRD (and design) are ready and the user wants to build, or runs /builder:build.
- Reads credentials
163 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TJaenichen/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- ryannel/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- RohiRIK/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- stericishere/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Soe-Reh/soes-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- RemiPelloux/kill-my-ideatheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use backprop, finances and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JuliusBrusseeSkillbackprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GerardoRdz96Skillfinances
Use when Gera talks about his money — logging an expense ("I spent X on Y"), checking where he stands this pay-period, closing a period, planning debt payoff, onboarding his financial picture, or asking for budgeting/finance opinions. Servy's financial brain. Triggers — "I spent", "log this expense", "where am I this period", "close the period", "how's my budget", "debt plan", "should I pay off", "finances onboard", "/finances".
Also in 3 projects that use this
cpiprintSkillfavicon
Generate favicons from a source image
Also in 3 projects that use this
madeehahassanSkillGo-Live
Pre-launch checklist. Use before making any app public, sharing a link externally, or announcing a product launch. Adapts to Claude Code, claude.ai, and Cowork.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JuliusBrusseeSkilldeepen
Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent rewrites. Triggers when the user says "deepen this", "improve the design", "this module feels shallow", "pull complexity down", "use spare budget on the codebase", or invokes /ck:deepen. Leans on the codebase-design skill's deep-module vocabulary when present.
Also in 3 projects that use this
synaptiaiSkillgate
Create a BDSK review_gate artifact. Defines a checkpoint that controls whether generated output may proceed toward acceptance. Use when defining quality, security, or scope gates for execution plans.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions163 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 163
- FalkorDB/FalkorDB★ 10ksame name
- microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml★ 8.6ksame name
- NexaAI/nexa-sdk★ 8.5ksame name
- hathach/tinyusb★ 7.3ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- pytorch/TensorRT★ 3ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- iPlug2/iPlug2★ 2.4ksame name
153 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 149 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
Coverage check (mandatory): every flow id in state.flows must appear in at least one task's Covers: line.
- Very specific: line 37
Write builder/04-plan.md (if it already exists, follow "Existing outputs" in state-rules.md: revise it, never overwrite the user's edits).
- Distinctive: line 40
Get approval before setup: If the user asked for defaults, or already approved, continue.
- Distinctive: line 44
Before any product code:
- Distinctive: line 45
Git: If the folder is already a git repository (git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree), reuse it.
- Distinctive: line 46
Existing files: Never overwrite or delete existing source files.
- Very specific: line 64
Check the result yourself: run the tests (front end and back end), and make sure the task's Check: holds.
- Very specific: line 65
Commit: builder: T<n> <title>.
- Very specific: line 66
Every decision the PRD didn't cover goes to builder/decisions.md (template ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build/templates/decisions.md) as a …
- Distinctive: line 68
Add realistic sample data, so the user can try the product straight away.
- Very specific: line 70
If you're blocked (missing account, failing dependency, unclear requirement), stop.
- Very specific: line 74
When every task of the current cycle is done and the app starts with the dev script:
- Distinctive: line 77
update the progress page;
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 149 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Phase 4 · Build
Goal: the first usable version of the product, working but not yet validated.
Input: builder/02-prd.md (+ builder/03-design.md if there are screens).
Output: the product's code, builder/04-plan.md, builder/decisions.md, and tasks tracked in state.json.
Read and follow:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/tone.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/state-rules.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/gates.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build/references/prompts.md(the method's original intent)
0 · Can we build here?
This phase runs commands (installing, testing, git). If you don't have a shell tool (no Bash), don't try to work around it. Say this, in the user's language, and stop:
Building needs a terminal. Open this same folder in Claude Code and run
/builder:next. Everything done so far is saved inbuilder/, so you'll continue exactly where you are.
1 · Gate
Apply the Build gate from gates.md. This includes the hasFrontend: null question, and generating the missing PRD or design with Continue anyway. A PRD generated here must have numbered flows (### F<n> —) with acceptance criteria, and they must be mirrored into state.flows, so the plan can cover them.
Then go to the first step of this phase that isn't done (plan → setup → build). Set phases.build.status to in_progress and currentPhase to build.
Step 1 · plan
Delegate to the planner subagent (Agent tool, subagent_type: "builder:planner"). Give it the paths of the PRD, the design (if any) and state.json. It returns the plan in the format of ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build/templates/04-plan.md. If the subagent tool isn't available, write the plan yourself, following ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/planner.md.
Coverage check (mandatory): every flow id in state.flows must appear in at least one task's Covers: line. If one is missing, add or adjust a task before going on. Never show an uncovered plan as finished.
Then:
- Write
builder/04-plan.md(if it already exists, follow "Existing outputs" instate-rules.md: revise it, never overwrite the user's edits). - Fill
state.tasks({ id, title, flows, status: "pending", cycle }), and each flow'staskslist. - Explain the plan in a few plain lines: the stack and why, how many tasks there are, and what the user will be able to try first.
- Get approval before setup. If the user asked for defaults, or already approved, continue.
Step 2 · setup
Before any product code:
- Git. If the folder is already a git repository (
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree), reuse it. Never rungit initagain. Otherwise rungit init, and explain in two lines what a commit is (a saved point you can go back to). - Existing files. Never overwrite or delete existing source files. Build around them, or ask.
- Project files. Create:
- the directory structure;
CLAUDE.md, from${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build/references/claude-md-base.md, filled in (merge with any existingCLAUDE.md, never replace it);- the
dev,testandbuildscripts; - linting and formatting;
.gitignore, covering at least.env,.env.*(but not.env.example), dependencies and build output;.env.example, if the product needs secrets.
- Everything follows the plan and the PRD's validation criteria. Prefer boring, well-known tools.
- First checkpoint commit:
builder: setup.
Step 3 · build
Work through the tasks of the current cycle in plan order. Keep going autonomously until all are done and tested.
For each task:
- Set it to
in_progressinstate.json. - Delegate it to the
implementersubagent (Agent tool,subagent_type: "builder:implementer", with the model the plan names). Give it the task text, the flows it covers with their acceptance criteria, and the relevant design screens. If the subagent tool isn't available, do the task yourself, following${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/implementer.md. - Check the result yourself: run the tests (front end and back end), and make sure the task's
Check:holds. - Commit:
builder: T<n> <title>. Record the short hash in the task'scheckpoint, set it todone, and update the progress page. - Every decision the PRD didn't cover goes to
builder/decisions.md(template${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/build/templates/decisions.md) as a newD<n>withStatus: pending. Increasestate.decisions.pendingandstate.decisions.totalby one each time.
Add realistic sample data, so the user can try the product straight away.
If you're blocked (missing account, failing dependency, unclear requirement), stop. Explain the blocker in plain words, say what you need from the user, and leave the task in_progress.
Finish
When every task of the current cycle is done and the app starts with the dev script:
- mark
buildand its stepsdone; - set
currentPhasetoiterate; - update the progress page;
- tell the user how to open the app, and that the next phase checks it together, flow by flow.
Close by suggesting /builder:next.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

