which-pr
Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Report which PR is being worked on in the current conversation. Use when asked about the current PR context.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-codeSkill
- analyze-projectSkill
- analyze-testsSkill
- audit-mergesSkill
- babysit-prSkill
- backlogSkill
- branchSkill
- coderabbitSkill
- commitSkill
- greptileSkill
- implement-issuesSkill
- issueSkill
- jiraSkill
- lintro-addSkill
- lintro-reviewSkill
- lintro-verifySkill
- lintSkill
- properizeSkill
- pr-raycastSkill
- prSkill
- raycastSkill
- rebaseSkill
- reconcileSkill
- scorecardSkill
- stand-ciSkill
- stand-generalSkill
- stand-odinSkill
- stand-pySkill
- stand-rustSkill
- stand-tsSkill
- sweep-prsSkill
- test-apiSkill
- test-shellSkill
- testSkill
- test-ui-qsfSkill
- test-uiSkill
- turbo-addSkill
- turbo-testSkill
- turbo-verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Look through the conversation history for any PR numbers, branch names, worktree paths, or gh pr output that was discussed.
- Distinctive: line 20
Do NOT run any git or gh commands.
- Distinctive: line 24
If no PR has been discussed in this conversation, say so.
- Distinctive: line 26
Keep the output short and direct.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Which PR
Report which PR is being worked on in the current conversation.
Usage
Look through the conversation history for any PR numbers, branch names, worktree
paths, or gh pr output that was discussed. Report:
- PR number and title
- URL
- Branch name
- Worktree path (if applicable)
Do NOT run any git or gh commands. The answer must come entirely from conversation context. This avoids interfering with worktrees or switching branches in other active sessions.
If no PR has been discussed in this conversation, say so.
Keep the output short and direct.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

