commit
Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-commit workflow and commit guidelines. Use when asked to commit changes. Requires passing lint and tests, signed commits, semantic prefixes, imperative mood.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- daledesilva/obsidian_inktheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- thoughtbot/rails-consultanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jisuzzzz/haechitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- denysdovhan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use validate-plan, act-on-feedback and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
shawn-dumasSkillvalidate-plan
Validate an orchestration plan after pre-flight certification. Runs adversarial review, deep review (verify prompt data against codebase), and PoC gate for risky approaches. Auto-invoked by orchestrate-* skills at Step 8.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillact-on-feedback
Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
decocmsSkilladd-mcp-tools
Guide for adding new MCP tools with consistent patterns for schemas, tool definitions, registry updates, and Better Auth integration
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgenerate-run-commands
Generate or modify run commands for the current session. Use when the user wants to set up or update run commands that appear in the session's Run button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkilloebb-scotty
Austrian rail travel planner (ÖBB Scotty). Use when planning train journeys in Austria, checking departures/arrivals at stations, or looking for service disruptions. Covers ÖBB trains, S-Bahn, regional trains, and connections to neighboring countries.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkillpi-share
Load and parse session transcripts from shittycodingagent.ai/buildwithpi.ai/buildwithpi.com/pi.dev (pi-share) URLs. Fetches gists, decodes embedded session data, and extracts conversation history.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- TryGhost/Ghost★ 56ksame name
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- ShareX/ShareX★ 41ksame name
- openai/symphony★ 27ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- windmill-labs/windmill★ 18ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverMemOS★ 14ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverOS★ 14ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-codeSkill
- analyze-projectSkill
- analyze-testsSkill
- audit-mergesSkill
- babysit-prSkill
- backlogSkill
- branchSkill
- coderabbitSkill
- greptileSkill
- implement-issuesSkill
- issueSkill
- jiraSkill
- lintro-addSkill
- lintro-reviewSkill
- lintro-verifySkill
- lintSkill
- properizeSkill
- pr-raycastSkill
- prSkill
- raycastSkill
- rebaseSkill
- reconcileSkill
- scorecardSkill
- stand-ciSkill
- stand-generalSkill
- stand-odinSkill
- stand-pySkill
- stand-rustSkill
- stand-tsSkill
- sweep-prsSkill
- test-apiSkill
- test-shellSkill
- testSkill
- test-ui-qsfSkill
- test-uiSkill
- turbo-addSkill
- turbo-testSkill
- turbo-verifySkill
- which-prSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 168 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Before making ANY commit:
- Very specific: line 14
Run the lint skill's workflow — all checks must pass with zero issues (abort if any issues remain).
- Very specific: line 16
All tests must pass (uv run lintro tst)
- Distinctive: line 21
Every commit MUST be signed/verified
- Very specific: line 22
Use semantic commit prefixes: fix:, feat:, chore:, docs:, refactor:, test:, build:, ci:, perf:, style:
- Distinctive: line 24
Commit messages MUST be in imperative mood ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
- Distinctive: line 33
Use judgment: 1 commit per file is too granular, 1 commit for everything is too coarse
- Distinctive: line 48
When working on a new extension or feature branch where all files are new:
- Distinctive: line 50
Every file should show as "A" (added), never "M" (modified)
- Distinctive: line 51
If you see "M" on files that should be new, the commit history needs fixing
- Distinctive: line 54
When modifying an existing codebase:
- Distinctive: line 61
If commits are poorly structured (too large, wrong groupings, or showing modified when should be added):
- Distinctive: line 68
Verify with git status that file statuses (A/M) are correct
- Distinctive: line 72
When asked to commit:
- Very specific: line 74
Run the lint skill's workflow — abort if any issues remain (follow the lint skill — full check, no --tools filtering)
- Distinctive: line 80
Run tests - abort if any failures:
- Very specific: line 86
When authoring or modifying a Raycast extension, use the raycast skill for toolchain-specific guidance
- Distinctive: line 88
Check Docker if applicable
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 168 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit
Pre-commit workflow and commit guidelines.
Pre-commit Checklist
Before making ANY commit:
- Run the
lintskill's workflow — all checks must pass with zero issues (abort if any issues remain). Follow thelintskill — full check, no--toolsfiltering. - All tests must pass (
uv run lintro tst) - Where applicable, Docker builds pass
Commit Requirements
- Every commit MUST be signed/verified
- Use semantic commit prefixes:
fix:,feat:,chore:,docs:,refactor:,test:,build:,ci:,perf:,style: - Commit messages MUST be in imperative mood ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
Commit Granularity
Make incremental, logical commits rather than one large commit:
- Group related changes (e.g., all logging for one subsystem)
- Separate concerns (e.g., bug fixes vs features vs docs)
- Each commit should be independently reviewable and revertable
- Use judgment: 1 commit per file is too granular, 1 commit for everything is too coarse
Good groupings:
feat(logging): add subprocess execution logging(one component)feat(logging): add config parsing logging(related files)docs: add debugging guide(documentation separate from code)
Bad groupings:
- One commit with 11 files touching 4 different concerns
- 11 separate commits for a cohesive feature
Branch Context Awareness
When working on a new extension or feature branch where all files are new:
- Every file should show as "A" (added), never "M" (modified)
- If you see "M" on files that should be new, the commit history needs fixing
- This indicates commits were made in the wrong order or need restructuring
When modifying an existing codebase:
- "M" (modified) is expected and correct
- Focus on logical grouping of related changes
Restructuring Commits
If commits are poorly structured (too large, wrong groupings, or showing modified when should be added):
- Find the commit before the problematic ones:
git log --oneline - Soft reset to that point:
git reset --soft <good-commit> - Unstage all changes:
git reset HEAD - Re-add and commit in logical groups with proper messages
- Verify with
git statusthat file statuses (A/M) are correct
Usage
When asked to commit:
- Run the
lintskill's workflow — abort if any issues remain (follow thelintskill — full check, no--toolsfiltering)- Raycast extensions: run
uv run lintro fmt/chkfirst, thennpm run lintper theraycastskill (Raycast rules take precedence) - Other projects without lintro: use the appropriate lint command from the
lintskill
- Raycast extensions: run
- Run tests - abort if any failures:
- Projects with lintro:
uv run lintro tst - Raycast extensions: run Vitest if the extension has tests configured (
bun testor the extension's test script); otherwise manual smoke test viabun run dev(see theraycastskill) - Other projects: use appropriate test command
- When authoring or modifying a Raycast extension, use the
raycastskill for toolchain-specific guidance
- Projects with lintro:
- Check Docker if applicable
- Review changes with
git statusto plan logical groupings Stage and commit in logical groups with signed, semantic, imperative messages:
git add <related-files> git commit -S -m "feat: add user authentication"- Repeat steps 4-5 for each logical group of changes
Examples
Good commit messages:
fix: resolve null pointer in user servicefeat: add dark mode togglechore: update dependenciesdocs: improve API documentationrefactor: simplify authentication flow
Bad commit messages:
fixed bug(not semantic, past tense)WIP(not descriptive)updates(not semantic, not specific)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

